Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
29 minutes ago, UND1983 said:

What schools throw to their tight ends alot? Personally, I would be more happy that the team is winning and scoring points vs if little Billy is getting his catches but that's just me.   You know more than us.

It was silly of me to suggest any schools throw to TEs or UND keep Red/Zavalney involved.  My apologies.

Posted
5 hours ago, gundy1124 said:

It was silly of me to suggest any schools throw to TEs or UND keep Red/Zavalney involved.  My apologies.

Its fine, just don't ever do that again! :lol:

Posted
4 hours ago, fightingsioux4life said:

Come on now @skateshattrick, @UND-FB-FAN and @Sioux>Bison, let's remember that we are all on the same side. All the infighting is not good for our fan base or any of our teams. NDSU trolls and lurkers probably make popcorn and sit back and enjoy it, which is reason enough not to engage in it. I have season tickets to both sports and I will always support all things UND. Here is to a sweep of the Goofs in Minneapolis and a W vs. South Dakota State in the Alerus Center!

Are we on the same side? I’m not a supporter of the hockey team OR the football team…… I’m a supporter of UND as a whole! 
 

fans of only one of the programs but not the other hurts UND as a school, all I am trying to do it bring one of the programs up to the level of the other. No reason one program should be favored above the other! From my recollection only one side was calling names!

Posted
10 hours ago, gfhockey said:

Lakes and I got in to it at zorbaz in Detroit lakes one night

I would love to meet that guy in person! Him not so much….. 

at least you can blame the alcohol for your craziness! 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, SiouxFan100 said:

Of. Course it helps our team to spread the play calls around to keep the other team guessing and this includes the tight ends

Which we appear to be doing

Posted
31 minutes ago, sioux24/7 said:

Anyone surprised by the lack of Ziebarth this year? Hoosman and Smith have both been excellent but just figured coming in we would see Ziebarth more than we have. 

I am surprised, however Hoosman has better than expected and has earned more carries than probably anybody expected.   Plus add Red into the mix a little too.  It's been a good problem to have.   Hopefully we can get a game or two that doesn't come down to the wire and Ziebarth can get a few touches.   

Posted
11 hours ago, sioux24/7 said:

Anyone surprised by the lack of Ziebarth this year? Hoosman and Smith have both been excellent but just figured coming in we would see Ziebarth more than we have. 

Ziebarth needs to be fresh for next year. I hope he’s learning everything he can from Hoosman. He should get a load of carries next year.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
On 10/11/2022 at 8:49 PM, Sioux>Bison said:

I would love to meet that guy in person! Him not so much….. 

at least you can blame the alcohol for your craziness! 

You could have posted this and invited more people….Zorbaz would be a neutral (?) location

Posted
14 minutes ago, Mama Sue said:

You could have posted this and invited more people….Zorbaz would be a neutral (?) location

It was during the summer a few years ago pre covid

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Listening to the 360 guys give their mid season review, and loved how they talked about the wrinkles Danny throws on 4th and 1 or short yardage situations to gain 30-40+yards. (As I've said, we did this a few years ago with Skokna, but I never saw it again until the last few games)

-vs. Missouri St - Misdirection by Tommy to the left, quick pitch right, Long TD run for Smith.

-vs Youngstown - Q lines up shotgun, runs up to the line, Maag in motion, fake the handoff to Maag, pitch to Smith for an easy TD up the left side of the field.

- 360 guys say next will be a fake pitch, drop back a few yards then toss it to the RB on a wheel route. I like it!

-What about this. Q take the snap and steps forward towards the line, tosses back or pitches out to Romfo who runs it outside and has a run or pass option. Fast enough to make a play, but could make a throw if the receiver gets open deep. Not as fast as Smith, but fast enough if the field is wide open, but has the arm to make a play if the defense sniffs out the run. I'm not Danny Freund offensive genius, but thoughts?

  • Upvote 2
Posted

What makes me most optimistic is being 4-2 and knowing how much improvement there is to be made, especially on the defense. As experience and confidence grow, the speed of their play will hopefully increase, making it tougher on the opposing offenses. Stay focused and go out and beat the Jacks next weekend!

  • Upvote 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, siouxfan512 said:

Listening to the 360 guys give their mid season review, and loved how they talked about the wrinkles Danny throws on 4th and 1 or short yardage situations to gain 30-40+yards. (As I've said, we did this a few years ago with Skokna, but I never saw it again until the last few games)

-vs. Missouri St - Misdirection by Tommy to the left, quick pitch right, Long TD run for Smith.

-vs Youngstown - Q lines up shotgun, runs up to the line, Maag in motion, fake the handoff to Maag, pitch to Smith for an easy TD up the left side of the field.

- 360 guys say next will be a fake pitch, drop back a few yards then toss it to the RB on a wheel route. I like it!

-What about this. Q take the snap and steps forward towards the line, tosses back or pitches out to Romfo who runs it outside and has a run or pass option. Fast enough to make a play, but could make a throw if the receiver gets open deep. Not as fast as Smith, but fast enough if the field is wide open, but has the arm to make a play if the defense sniffs out the run. I'm not Danny Freund offensive genius, but thoughts?

I've been waiting for Q to be in......in Shotgun formation....take the snap.....take a step or two forward to fake the run, then pull up and hit a TE going down the seam. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Siouxperfan7 said:

Side note:  A fun drinking game would be to drink every time Kelly Howe says "Guys".  :D

You must turn in your car keys before playing. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Sioux94 said:

I've been waiting for Q to be in......in Shotgun formation....take the snap.....take a step or two forward to fake the run, then pull up and hit a TE going down the seam. 

Will be for ndsu 

Posted

Listening to the 360 podcast, I though it was nice to have Herder on. Usually pretty good insight and nice to have an outsider's perspective.

I did hear him say that outside of NDSU and SDSU, he could see Montana being in the mix to compete for a national championship as well. Now that we are outside of the Big Sky, I don't follow those teams as closely. My initial reaction wasy: ok, sure .... its Montana. Then I started digging into the season and if you ask me, they have yet to prove anything ... certainly not their ranking. Now, The Griz could absolutely be a great team, but they have yet to be tested.

At 5-0, their opponents have a combined record of 6-21:crazy:

Game 1: Northwestern State (2-4: Beat Lamar and Nichols)

Game 2: South Dakota (1-4: Beat Cal Poly)

Game 3: Indiana St. (1-4: Beat N. Alabama ... though tested the almighty cows)

Game 4: Portland St. (2-3: Beat N. AZ and something calls Lincoln University)

Game 5: Idaho St. (0-6) - The Griz won this by a whopping 8 points. Granted, we have see weird things happen in Pocatella.

At first glance, I'm not sure the Bobcats resume is much better. Though I will concede that Sac State and Weber State both have wins against Colorado State and Utah State respectively. It will be interesting to see who rises to the top in the Big Sky, and even if it is the Griz or the Cats, they haven't shown the dominance you would expect from their lofty rankings yet; though I would put the Bobcats ahead of the Griz. (Disclaimer: This is based on scores, stats and articles...I haven't been actually watching these teams)

Posted
7 minutes ago, siouxfan512 said:

Listening to the 360 podcast, I though it was nice to have Herder on. Usually pretty good insight and nice to have an outsider's perspective.

I did hear him say that outside of NDSU and SDSU, he could see Montana being in the mix to compete for a national championship as well. Now that we are outside of the Big Sky, I don't follow those teams as closely. My initial reaction wasy: ok, sure .... its Montana. Then I started digging into the season and if you ask me, they have yet to prove anything ... certainly not their ranking. Now, The Griz could absolutely be a great team, but they have yet to be tested.

At 5-0, their opponents have a combined record of 6-21:crazy:

Game 1: Northwestern State (2-4: Beat Lamar and Nichols)

Game 2: South Dakota (1-4: Beat Cal Poly)

Game 3: Indiana St. (1-4: Beat N. Alabama ... though tested the almighty cows)

Game 4: Portland St. (2-3: Beat N. AZ and something calls Lincoln University)

Game 5: Idaho St. (0-6) - The Griz won this by a whopping 8 points. Granted, we have see weird things happen in Pocatella.

At first glance, I'm not sure the Bobcats resume is much better. Though I will concede that Sac State and Weber State both have wins against Colorado State and Utah State respectively. It will be interesting to see who rises to the top in the Big Sky, and even if it is the Griz or the Cats, they haven't shown the dominance you would expect from their lofty rankings yet; though I would put the Bobcats ahead of the Griz. (Disclaimer: This is based on scores, stats and articles...I haven't been actually watching these teams)

My money would be on Sac State as the best team in the Big Sky. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, forksandspoons said:

My money would be on Sac State as the best team in the Big Sky. 

I will respond to my original post and acknowledge that Montana IS undefeated AND you can only play the teams that are on your schedule. They should still have some time to prove themselves. Clearly a good football team BUT they have yet to really play some top competition yet.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, siouxfan512 said:

I will respond to my original post and acknowledge that Montana IS undefeated AND you can only play the teams that are on your schedule. They should still have some time to prove themselves. Clearly a good football team BUT they have yet to really play some top competition yet.

Agree! They do play at both Sac State, Weber State, and Montana State, so their opportunities to prove themselves will come. Not sure I see them losing any of their other games. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...