Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Frozen4sioux said:

A leader has to make tough and unpopular decisions.

A good leader can communicate effectively why those decisions need to be made and why the organization will benefit.

The manner in which kennedy opperated included some tough decisions that were handled with terrible competency, repeatedly arrogant posturing and was dickishly ambivalent to the optics of public perception.

Its quite ridiculous to lament the loss of someone who leads in this fashion, and worse to feel that a quality individual in the position isnt possible.

The flagship institution of the State of North Dakota should expect a competant gracefull leader who can make and explain tough positions.

Amen

  • Upvote 1
Posted

I don’t give Kennedy a pass because of the budget.  What state agency didn’t have to deal with budget issues.  You can still grow the university at the same time budgets were cut. A lot of his problems were optics amongst the poor decisions he made.  Sort of like our governor with budget cuts but then he is exposed with travel issues and demands for the new house.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
3 hours ago, John W. said:

Posters on this site must be 'perfect'....ie. it's Kennedy's fault, it's Bubba's fault, it's Berry's fault, it's Shafer's fault....

 

San Andreas Fault?

Posted

UND-FB-FAN for president!!  All knowing, most aware.     He/she seems to have the answer for everything.  Although, he may want to wait until Bubba gets fired as he/she could step right in.  Unless, of course, the board from the Alerus can scoop him up to manage that entire cluster they have created. etc, etc, etc!!!!!!  

Posted

I'd say Kennedy landed 'on his feet'....A 'Power 5 ' conference...PAC  12 member....and away from the 'pettiness that IS North Dakota.'...Hockey is not on the radar, for U of C....CC and Denver have dibs on that 'niche' sport in the state....

Posted
12 minutes ago, UND1983 said:

Sorry Mark but I don't care what color or what gender that person was.  The optics on it were HORRIBLE.  

The optics were horrible; but the target was easy not being a %gobc member. 

Kennedy's not right, but he's not wrong. --> Port pointed her out before the other fellow that came into question; maybe ask Rob why he broke the one story first, before the older news.

Posted
1 hour ago, Teeder11 said:

If they're lucky. He's one of the nation's best in the areas UND needed help in. Another thing that is the norm across the nation but not in small minded N.D. When something like this becomes a  major controversy,  North Dakota becomes a laughing stock again. Same with airplane-gate (Bresciani) of a few years ago. A lot of passive aggressive back stabbing jealousy masked as humble ahh shucks populism in this region.

EDIT: Point of clarification, Kennedy never hired Horwitz initially. SMHS did.

This post is gold, and exactly what I have been saying lately.

A lot of small minded people with big mouths!  Happy for Kennedy, and I thank him for what he has done at UND.  Like @geaux_sioux wrote earlier, and I paraphrase very crudely:  "dude got amazing amount of !@#$ done, but came off as an ass sometimes to people in ND".

  • Upvote 4
Posted
19 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said:

Anyone here still want to compare Clifford to this clown???

Guy just called a good majority of the people on this board (and people of Grand Forks/North Dakota) racist.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Cratter said:

Guy just called a good majority of the people on this board (and people of Grand Forks/North Dakota) racist.

Must have Kim Foxx on speed dial...........

Posted
1 hour ago, jdub27 said:

There's some merit to portions of you criticism, but no one is going to be perfect, especially when making incredibly tough and unpopular decisions. There are also numerous examples where no explanation or communication was going to be enough to satisfy the group think because as whole, people react with their emotions instead of logic. Public perception wasn't going to be based on the facts, particularly when the media reporting it already had an axe to grind. 

You can describe it however you want, but in most cases, the reactions and "solutions" provided by those lobbing the criticism were laughable at best. Hell, most people probably couldn't tell you a thing Kennedy did except for cutting WIH, closing Ray Richards and bumbling the nickname process (even though he wasn't hear for the decision to drop the Sioux name, the choice of the new nickname or the choice of the new logo).

Its telling that there are leaders of multiple other higher-ed institutions that have a much higher profile than the flagship institution of the State of North Dakota who have shown so much interest in hiring MK, yet people here are busy holding a grudge 2 years later about the loss of an athletic team that no one showed up to support all while bleeding the athletic department dry.

yeah.... 

might wanna read the story that just broke.

Leadership is something very different than what he just lobbed on his way out.

Any supporters he had should be shuffling boxes into his office as we speak. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...