siouxkid12 Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 24 minutes ago, Shawn-O said: The meddling with the UNLV presidency is a bad look for KEM, sorry. If we want to rebrand it as activist investing in lieu of philanthropy, then I'm cool with the whole thing. https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2018/4/17/unlv-len-jessup-engelstad-family-foundation She should just stop donating her dads money then. I can't stand how she feels that she can dictate how a donation is used. 1 Quote
Shawn-O Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 8 minutes ago, siouxkid12 said: She should just stop donating her dads money then. I can't stand how she feels that she can dictate how a donation is used. If Brewster, Jones, and Pryor want a hawk on the court let 'em have the god damn hawk. Good Christ. https://www.bemidjipioneer.com/news/education/4446413-emails-show-kennedy-engelstad-feud-centered-logo-betty Please read and tell me who comes off as the voice of reason. 4 Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 if heidi becomes pres and she doesn't get along with KEM can two women technically get into a pissing match? 1 Quote
tnt Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 7 minutes ago, siouxkid12 said: She should just stop donating her dads money then. I can't stand how she feels that she can dictate how a donation is used. So you were pretty upset with Ray Richards then huh? Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 1 minute ago, tnt said: So you were pretty upset with Ray Richards then huh? u mean...here's some free land to build a golf course (that was still profitable) and then decide years later to build condos?... Quote
NoiseInsideMyHead Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 17 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: if heidi becomes pres and she doesn't get along with KEM can two women technically get into a pissing match? Only if you put down some plastic. 1 Quote
The Sicatoka Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 1 hour ago, 777sioux777 said: Tom Clifford was not a CEO or a CFO prior to becoming the UND president, and he's the greatest president we've had and will probably ever have. Yes, he was a dean of a college prior, but at the same time, HH was director of Dakota Gasification, which came with a board position (I think those folks have fiscal say). I serve on a board similar to Dakota Gasification. There's a huge difference between that and being the CFO. Being a Dean is a chief executive position within that sub-organization. (This is where Heitkamp's time as AG would be comparable, AG being a sub-org in State government.) Quote
CMSioux Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 Why is Heidi getting bashed when it was a simple thought thrown out in the media. No offer has been made, it was just a thought? Can't the politics wait until it becomes something? 1 Quote
The Sicatoka Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 4 minutes ago, CMSioux said: Why is Heidi getting bashed ... Bashed? Her public curriculum vitae is being reviewed for suitable qualifications. Quote
geaux_sioux Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 2 hours ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: if heidi becomes pres and she doesn't get along with KEM can two women technically get into a pissing match? Thanks to the She Wee they can. 1 Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 3 hours ago, siouxkid12 said: Tact goes both ways and Kennedy was given a bad deal to start out, he made cuts that were not friendly to some and it hurt their little feelings but would you rather be strung along or just cut off quickly? There were a lot of people and things that did not help UND out any longer and they needed to be removed, it sucks but its life. It also didn't help that you had a donor with daddy's money, running to the paper every time something didn't go her way. Don't get me wrong, I am not defending KEM. I don't like her and think she is a spoiled little rich girl who wants everyone to bow down to her. She is also not an honest broker. I just wish Kennedy had risen above her pettiness and at least tried to be tactful in dealing with what is a sensitive topic (distribution of REA revenues). I dislike both of them for different reasons. 1 Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 3 hours ago, tnt said: So you were pretty upset with Ray Richards then huh? Apples and oranges, both in amounts of money and overall impact. Quote
tnt Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 1 hour ago, fightingsioux4life said: Apples and oranges, both in amounts of money and overall impact. The point is that he dictated how he wanted the land to be used. UND didn’t have to accept the donation if they didn’t like the purpose. Quote
UNDBIZ Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, tnt said: The point is that he dictated how he wanted the land to be used. UND didn’t have to accept the donation if they didn’t like the purpose. Times change and half the land was bought by UND. Quote
Cratter Posted May 3, 2019 Posted May 3, 2019 Let's not forget Schafer decommissioned Ray Richards. Kennedy was the one who said hey maybe we should bring it back. Quote
SiouxVolley Posted May 4, 2019 Posted May 4, 2019 5 hours ago, 777sioux777 said: Tom Clifford was not a CEO or a CFO prior to becoming the UND president, and he's the greatest president we've had and will probably ever have. Yes, he was a dean of a college prior, but at the same time, HH was director of Dakota Gasification, which came with a board position (I think those folks have fiscal say). There is a big push now to have women on the boards. But each director supposedly has different expertise. In HH's case, it's PR and government affairs. Quote
Hawkster Posted May 4, 2019 Posted May 4, 2019 I would support HH to run UND. She's proven she can be diplomatic about things, she's a Democrat who has had a fair amount of success in a Republican state so you know she can at least build support where it's needed. Quote
Frozen4sioux Posted May 4, 2019 Author Posted May 4, 2019 56 minutes ago, Hawkster said: I would support HH to run UND. She's proven she can be diplomatic about things, she's a Democrat who has had a fair amount of success in a Republican state so you know she can at least build support where it's needed. HH would not have a phome call returned by most of the legislature. They HATE her and her family. Really that relationship is a nonstarter. Quote
SiouxFan100 Posted May 4, 2019 Posted May 4, 2019 10 minutes ago, Frozen4sioux said: HH would not have a phome call returned by most of the legislature. They HATE her and her family. Really that relationship is a nonstarter. You know this how? Quote
UNDColorado Posted May 4, 2019 Posted May 4, 2019 On 5/2/2019 at 3:57 PM, John W. said: THANK goodness for Mark Kennedy and Brian Jones.....at least there's been something of interest on this board rather than some blather about a 5th rate 'niche' sport that is of very little interest or has much following in the USA.... You mean those sold out arenas in Carolina, Dallas and San Jose? 2 Quote
CMSioux Posted May 4, 2019 Posted May 4, 2019 9 hours ago, Frozen4sioux said: HH would not have a phome call returned by most of the legislature. They HATE her and her family. Really that relationship is a nonstarter. For those this is true about it says more about them than HH. 1 Quote
Popular Post siouxkid12 Posted May 4, 2019 Popular Post Posted May 4, 2019 14 hours ago, fightingsioux4life said: Don't get me wrong, I am not defending KEM. I don't like her and think she is a spoiled little rich girl who wants everyone to bow down to her. She is also not an honest broker. I just wish Kennedy had risen above her pettiness and at least tried to be tactful in dealing with what is a sensitive topic (distribution of REA revenues). I dislike both of them for different reasons. I will admit that Kennedy had some faults but I am able to over look them due to his honest assessment of the University as a whole. He made a lot of tough decisions and I believe he put the University in a better position for the future. KEM is just a spoiled B^&*( who doesn't care about the betterment of the University as a whole. 2 7 Quote
Goon Posted May 4, 2019 Posted May 4, 2019 19 hours ago, The Sicatoka said: I'd like to see Morgan Olsen but I fear that bridge was burned (charges set and detonated, dropped in the river, floated down river, set adrift at sea) last time. Someone from that has a history with the University of North Dakota. Seems like a good choice. Has a higher education background. Quote
southpaw Posted May 4, 2019 Posted May 4, 2019 1 hour ago, siouxkid12 said: I will admit that Kennedy had some faults but I am able to over look them due to his honest assessment of the University as a whole. He made a lot of tough decisions and I believe he put the University in a better position for the future. KEM is just a spoiled B^&*( who doesn't care about the betterment of the University as a whole. Agreed. If given the option, I'd take Kennedy again for the past 3 years. Made some tough decisions but made the University better for it. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.