cberkas Posted August 30, 2021 Share Posted August 30, 2021 If they ever bring back the program, bring back no one the was associated with the team before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDBIZ Posted August 30, 2021 Share Posted August 30, 2021 8 hours ago, cberkas said: If they ever bring back the program, bring back no one the was associated with the team before. And make it non-scholarship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxperfan7 Posted August 30, 2021 Share Posted August 30, 2021 21 hours ago, Benny Baker said: Really hate the "sloppy, clumsy way it was announced - with the team on the ice, practicing" narrative. NCAA allowed one hour of organized practice time per week. Everyone saw the writing on the wall and knew the date and time the announcement was going to be made. Idalski knowingly scheduled that one hour practice at the exact same time the announcement was going to be made. He did it for optics and to throw egg on his employer's face. Shame on him. And yeah, UND (men's) hockey has a great tradition, which makes it all the more embarrassing that despite that tradition, the hockey facilities, the heralded Lammy twins, and a parade of European Olympians, UND women's hockey never managed to win a single NCAA playoff game. Ever. EVER. Idalski is 100% to blame for the initial reaction from players. I don't doubt the stories of players getting emotional because the program was cut are real. Idalski knew for a fact the program was (excuse the pun) on this ice and that the chances of it being cut were overwhelming. And that may have been his plan all along. To make the admiration look bad by keeping his players in the dark about what could happen, practicing and bringing a recruit in the very day they cut the program. You can blame the UND administration all you want, but the initial backlash from players players is ALL on him. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petey23 Posted August 30, 2021 Share Posted August 30, 2021 39 minutes ago, Siouxperfan7 said: Idalski is 100% to blame for the initial reaction from players. I don't doubt the stories of players getting emotional because the program was cut are real. Idalski knew for a fact the program was (excuse the pun) on this ice and that the chances of it being cut were overwhelming. And that may have been his plan all along. To make the admiration look bad by keeping his players in the dark about what could happen, practicing and bringing a recruit in the very day they cut the program. You can blame the UND administration all you want, but the initial backlash from players players is ALL on him. I think anyone with a passing interest in UND Athletics knew the program was very likely to be cut. When UND hired a law firm that specializes in dotting i's and crossing t's with regards to Title 9 compliance most people could put 2 and 2 together from there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux>Bison Posted August 30, 2021 Share Posted August 30, 2021 14 hours ago, 90siouxfan said: Idalski ruined the program.... change my mind. Idalski is a commie lover…… says a lot 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux>Bison Posted August 30, 2021 Share Posted August 30, 2021 2 hours ago, petey23 said: I think anyone with a passing interest in UND Athletics knew the program was very likely to be cut. When UND hired a law firm that specializes in dotting i's and crossing t's with regards to Title 9 compliance most people could put 2 and 2 together from there. So in the UND contract is that firm liable for defending any lawsuits that come out of their recommendation to the university??? I seriously wonder if anyone ever reads the contract before signing….. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted August 30, 2021 Share Posted August 30, 2021 Idalski didn't ruin the program, it was terrible before he took over and he made it a bit better. It was never great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWSiouxMN Posted August 30, 2021 Share Posted August 30, 2021 10 minutes ago, UND1983 said: Idalski didn't ruin the program, it was terrible before he took over and he made it a bit better. It was never great. It never could take the next step. Always had those headscratching losses that cost them NCAA tournament bids. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoiseInsideMyHead Posted August 30, 2021 Share Posted August 30, 2021 1 hour ago, Sioux>Bison said: So in the UND contract is that firm liable for defending any lawsuits that come out of their recommendation to the university??? I seriously wonder if anyone ever reads the contract before signing….. Probably depends on whether you're buying an opinion, or insurance. Just because you die on the operating table doesn't mean the surgeon committed malpractice. Calculated risks and informed consent and all that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux>Bison Posted August 30, 2021 Share Posted August 30, 2021 5 minutes ago, NoiseInsideMyHead said: Probably depends on whether you're buying an opinion, or insurance. Just because you die on the operating table doesn't mean the surgeon committed malpractice. Calculated risks and informed consent and all that. Man I need to be a lawyer. Lawyers alway get paid whether they do a good job or bad. I would be fired if my recommendations failed in a fiery wreck. Obviously nothing is a 100% guarantee but I guess some professions do not have the fortitude to stand behind their work. “insert lawyer joke here” 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToDaClub Posted August 30, 2021 Share Posted August 30, 2021 26 minutes ago, Sioux>Bison said: Man I need to be a lawyer. Lawyers alway get paid whether they do a good job or bad. I would be fired if my recommendations failed in a fiery wreck. Obviously nothing is a 100% guarantee but I guess some professions do not have the fortitude to stand behind their work. “insert lawyer joke here” Should've hired the firm "Duey, Cheatem, and Howe" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted September 2, 2021 Share Posted September 2, 2021 Northern Michigan looking to be the first in Michigan https://www.therinklive.com/womens-wcha/7169042-At-Northern-Michigan-an-obligation-to-add-womens-hockey 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 The WCHA and B1G have a partnership to to stream games on B1G+ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel_Sioux Posted September 3, 2021 Share Posted September 3, 2021 On 8/30/2021 at 12:53 PM, UND1983 said: Idalski didn't ruin the program, it was terrible before he took over and he made it a bit better. It was never great. True, but he did so with a large budget and international recruits. Meanwhile smaller schools in MN were just as competitive as us with a fraction of the budget and using local players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted September 4, 2021 Share Posted September 4, 2021 43 minutes ago, Rebel_Sioux said: True, but he did so with a large budget and international recruits. Meanwhile smaller schools in MN were just as competitive as us with a fraction of the budget and using local players. kinda weird that the wokes are saying we need women's hockey back at UND so local girls can live their dream of playing at und yet idalski took every crappy fin, swede, or german he could find (if he was our coach now he would exclusively recruit chinese commys)..... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farce poobah Posted September 4, 2021 Share Posted September 4, 2021 7 hours ago, cberkas said: The WCHA and B1G have a partnership to to stream games on B1G+ Less of a coup after the WCHA ended. Presumably this is for women's hockey? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted September 4, 2021 Share Posted September 4, 2021 17 minutes ago, farce poobah said: Less of a coup after the WCHA ended. Presumably this is for women's hockey? Yes, Woman's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted November 12, 2021 Share Posted November 12, 2021 Women’s Hockey Tournament Expands to 11 Teams - SB Nation College Hockey (sbncollegehockey.com) Long overdue, since the WCHA dominates womans hockey. should have done 12 teams instead of 11 teams and I could see that changing in the near future. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayduke1 Posted November 12, 2021 Share Posted November 12, 2021 On 9/3/2021 at 6:06 PM, SIOUXFAN97 said: kinda weird that the wokes are saying we need women's hockey back at UND so local girls can live their dream of playing at und yet idalski took every crappy fin, swede, or german he could find (if he was our coach now he would exclusively recruit chinese commys)..... I'm looking forward to the reinstatement of UND women's hockey that includes Chinese woke commies. That way I can watch your complete meltdown. Have fun with that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gfhockey Posted November 12, 2021 Share Posted November 12, 2021 1 hour ago, Hayduke1 said: I'm looking forward to the reinstatement of UND women's hockey that includes Chinese woke commies. That way I can watch your complete meltdown. Have fun with that. Maybe they will all come over with fufeng corn plant 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChadR Posted December 30, 2021 Share Posted December 30, 2021 Honest question - who is funding the legal bills for these women's hockey lawsuit still going through the courts? (another one was just tossed out this week). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cberkas Posted December 30, 2021 Share Posted December 30, 2021 6 minutes ago, ChadR said: Honest question - who is funding the legal bills for these women's hockey lawsuit still going through the courts? (another one was just tossed out this week). I honestly forgot there was one going on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted December 30, 2021 Share Posted December 30, 2021 19 minutes ago, ChadR said: Honest question - who is funding the legal bills for these women's hockey lawsuit still going through the courts? (another one was just tossed out this week). lammy's mom had a potluck fundraiser at holy family last week....autographed lammy books with five plates bought Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux>Bison Posted December 30, 2021 Share Posted December 30, 2021 1 hour ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: lammy's mom had a potluck fundraiser at holy family last week....autographed lammy books with five plates bought Pathetic. The Lammy’s need to drop it for the good of the university, not for the good of their BS cause! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWSiouxMN Posted December 30, 2021 Share Posted December 30, 2021 https://www.grandforksherald.com/news/local/federal-judge-once-again-dismisses-und-womens-hockey-lawsuit-lawyer-leaves-the-door-open-to-further-action So basically, they allow it to be dismissed because they agreed their original position is moot, only to plan to potentially refile claiming something else. Do I got all of that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.