Popular Post iluvdebbies Posted February 9, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted February 9, 2017 1 minute ago, bigskyvikes said: Hence "common sense". The only view they had was with the stick between the puck and the camera. So like the talking heads said, there is no "conclusive view". My opinion, the ref signaling onside should have been it, these reviews need to go away. Reviewing if a goal is in the net is one thing, these are no good IMO. I disagree ...there were two conclusive views. The talking heads all agreed that it was offsides. Toronto thought other wise. Toronto blew that call. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigskyvikes Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Just now, iluvdebbies said: I disagree ...there were two conclusive views. The talking heads all agreed that it was offsides. Toronto thought other wise. Toronto blew that call. You should turn on PA right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 8 minutes ago, iluvdebbies said: I disagree ...there were two conclusive views. The talking heads all agreed that it was offsides. Toronto thought other wise. Toronto blew that call. The law of physics make those views conclusive. Did the puck stop moving? Yes. What possibly could have stopped it? A stick. Do we need to see the exact piece of tape that stopped the puck? However, it did results in a nice Parise goal so that made it better for me at least Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 The view from behind the play (Parise side) made we wonder (inconclusive). The view from the Coyle side, sure the stick was between the camera and puck, but why didn't the puck keep coming? The view from straight down the blue line was a no-brainer: offsides. The Wild got a gift on that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigskyvikes Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 It was funny listening to BB on PA, he sounded like he knew it was offsides but said all the right things to act as if the refs made the right call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxforce19 Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 1 hour ago, bigskyvikes said: It was funny listening to BB on PA, he sounded like he knew it was offsides but said all the right things to act as if the refs made the right call. He was off side, but he was not on the initial zone entry. The puck went out of the zone again after the initial zone entry. The explanation Zach got was that the officials weren't permitted to look at that entry, only the initial zone entry can be looked at. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 3 hours ago, scpa0305 said: Didn't coyle pull the puck back to the blue line to re-establish possession? When coyle initially caught the puck it was still in the ozone (as well as parise) and that is what everyone (including the announcers) was looking at. However, I could have sworn coyle pulled the puck back to the blue line. Doesn't the blue line belong to whatever zone the puck is in, so wouldn't Coyle have had to pull the puck COMPLETELY over the blue line for the puck to be considered out of the offensive zone? He pulled it onto the blue line, but I don't think he got it all the way over. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scpa0305 Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 3 minutes ago, Snake said: Doesn't the blue line belong to whatever zone the puck is in, so wouldn't Coyle have had to pull the puck COMPLETELY over the blue line for the puck to be considered out of the offensive zone? He pulled it onto the blue line, but I don't think he got it all the way over. That I don't know. It was just so obvious that there is no way Toronto could miss something like that. There must have been some reason. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Just now, scpa0305 said: That I don't know. It was just so obvious that there is no way Toronto could miss something like that. There must have been some reason. No doubt... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigGreyAnt41 Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 4 minutes ago, Snake said: Doesn't the blue line belong to whatever zone the puck is in, so wouldn't Coyle have had to pull the puck COMPLETELY over the blue line for the puck to be considered out of the offensive zone? He pulled it onto the blue line, but I don't think he got it all the way over. Yea, except the puck came out to center ice, and while Parise was still in the zone, on his way out to tag-up, the puck was passed back to Coyle and brought into the zone, with Parise still in the offensive zone. It was about as clear of an offsides as there can be. I don't know how they said it was inconclusive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 1 minute ago, BigGreyAnt41 said: Yea, except the puck came out to center ice, and while Parise was still in the zone, on his way out to tag-up, the puck was passed back to Coyle and brought into the zone, with Parise still in the offensive zone. It was about as clear of an offsides as there can be. I don't know how they said it was inconclusive. Exactly. He possessed it with Zach in the zone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDBIZ Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 2 hours ago, siouxforce19 said: He was off side, but he was not on the initial zone entry. The puck went out of the zone again after the initial zone entry. The explanation Zach got was that the officials weren't permitted to look at that entry, only the initial zone entry can be looked at. That was my understanding as well. The initial offsides was missed, but the puck then came into the neutral zone and reentered with Parise in neutral zone. I believe they can only consider the entry into the zone immediately prior to goal scoring, which wasn't offsides. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iluvdebbies Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 10 minutes ago, UNDBIZ said: That was my understanding as well. The initial offsides was missed, but the puck then came into the neutral zone and reentered with Parise in neutral zone. I believe they can only consider the entry into the zone immediately prior to goal scoring, which wasn't offsides. Parise was offside when Coyle touched the puck .....the puck never came back out of the zone before the goal was scored. So it could be reviewed and it was. They just blew the call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iluvdebbies Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDPUCKS Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 Another nice story on Stecher. http://vancouversun.com/sports/hockey/nhl/vancouver-canucks/jeff-paterson-not-a-stretch-to-say-canucks-rookie-troy-stecher-is-standing-tall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burd Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 9 points by former Sioux last night in Hawks/Wild game, two of the winningest teams in the league. Hattie and two assists for Toews, a goal and two assists for Nick, and a goal for God. Decent showing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post geaux_sioux Posted February 22, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted February 22, 2017 On February 13, 2017 at 5:12 PM, UNDPUCKS said: Another nice story on Stecher. http://vancouversun.com/sports/hockey/nhl/vancouver-canucks/jeff-paterson-not-a-stretch-to-say-canucks-rookie-troy-stecher-is-standing-tall I still think he was the biggest loss from last years team. Leadership by example and then some. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 9 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said: I still think he was the biggest loss from last years team. Leadership by example and then some. Couldn't agree more. A great d-man and the hardest worker on the team. Stecher took zero shifts off, which held everyone accountable. And when he made one of those plays where he went into a scrum with 4 guys, pulled the puck out and skated the length of the ice to set up a play it got the crowd pumped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 7 minutes ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said: Couldn't agree more. A great d-man and the hardest worker on the team. Stecher took zero shifts off, which held everyone accountable. And when he made one of those plays where he went into a scrum with 4 guys, pulled the puck out and skated the length of the ice to set up a play it got the crowd pumped. I still remember the first time I saw him play. Instantly my favorite player on the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfaninseattle Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 4 hours ago, burd said: 9 points by former Sioux last night in Hawks/Wild game, two of the winningest teams in the league. Hattie and two assists for Toews, a goal and two assists for Nick, and a goal for God. Decent showing. Well played. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Lahey Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 The way schmaltz played last night it would have been a dream if him and jost were our top 2 centers. Wouldn't even be fair... Looks like he's starting to get his confidence at the next level good to see. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaMikeFoxtrot Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 Saw Ice Guardians and made mental notes of former Sioux in it: Zombo Toews Dell Oshie Nelson Forbort Vande Verde Hrkac (not confirmed but mentioned in credits) If anyone else sees it feel free to add more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxSherm94 Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 4 hours ago, geaux_sioux said: I still remember the first time I saw him play. Instantly my favorite player on the team. Why this sticks in my memory so well I don't know, but his goal against CC, second game first round of NCHC conference tournament in 2014. Besides the national championship celebration and the OT winner against Air Force last year, I don't remember a more loud crowd inside the Ralph. Granted I'm only a senior in college, but it was absolutely insane. Love Stecher, always will. Incredible athlete on and off the ice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel_Sioux Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 Chay Genoway was my favorite player from my college days. Last I heard he's doing well in the KHL 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDMOORHEAD Posted February 22, 2017 Share Posted February 22, 2017 7 hours ago, geaux_sioux said: I still think he was the biggest loss from last years team. Leadership by example and then some. Fill a team with guys like Stetcher, not that it would be possible, you'd win a national title more often than not. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.