Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

2021-2022 football season


Nodak78

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, UNDColorado said:

Updated Roster just released: https://fightinghawks.com/sports/football/roster

I was lookin at D Line. Three guys at 290 (Morrison, Beach, Orlando) which is nice to see. A couple guys at 270 which is still too small.

The roster seems heavy on WR, (16).  Same amount as O-line (16).  

I like the 3 big guys at D-line in the 290 range.  With Ends Quentin (260lbs), Thorsness (260), and J. Johnson (255) we are close......but not quite there in my opinion.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UNDColorado said:

Updated Roster just released: https://fightinghawks.com/sports/football/roster

I was lookin at D Line. Three guys at 290 (Morrison, Beach, Orlando) which is nice to see. A couple guys at 270 which is still too small.

I noticed the TE from DL is 245 lbs on the roster (247 this past weekend) and still running well and looks lean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, gundy1124 said:

The roster seems heavy on WR, (16).  Same amount as O-line (16).  

I like the 3 big guys at D-line in the 290 range.  With Ends Quentin (260lbs), Thorsness (260), and J. Johnson (255) we are close......but not quite there in my opinion.

Johnson at 255 could be interesting.  That has to be 20 lbs since last year.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

D-Line Weights (Difference) from Spring Roster:

  • Lennon: +15
  • Orlando: +15
  • Morrison: +15
  • Seguin: +10
  • Pierre: +10
  • Johnson: +10
  • Thorsness: +5
  • Beach: +5
  • Keech: +5
  • Lickfeldt: 0

 

That's really impressive overall. I agree, I think the D-Line is really close to getting to that ideal weight. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gundy1124 said:

The roster seems heavy on WR, (16).  Same amount as O-line (16).  

I like the 3 big guys at D-line in the 290 range.  With Ends Quentin (260lbs), Thorsness (260), and J. Johnson (255) we are close......but not quite there in my opinion.

Agreed. The two guys at 270 are interior and I would like to see them bigger. We are getting close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, AJS said:

D-Line Weights (Difference) from Spring Roster:

  • Lennon: +15
  • Orlando: +15
  • Morrison: +15
  • Seguin: +10
  • Pierre: +10
  • Johnson: +10
  • Thorsness: +5
  • Beach: +5
  • Keech: +5
  • Lickfeldt: 0

 

That's really impressive overall. I agree, I think the D-Line is really close to getting to that ideal weight. 

I absolutely can’t wait to see Orlando in action. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, geaux_sioux said:

I absolutely can’t wait to see Orlando in action. 

This right here. Hopefully he stays healthy and we get to see what he can do. I'm liking the added weight these guys are putting on. Would really like to see Lickfeldt and Pieere put on a little more but its a step in the right direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GoHawks said:

This right here. Hopefully he stays healthy and we get to see what he can do. I'm liking the added weight these guys are putting on. Would really like to see Lickfeldt and Pieere put on a little more but its a step in the right direction.

I wonder if Lickfeldt isn’t maxed out. I like Pierre at DE better though. So explosive off the line.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, AJS said:

Opponents averaged 21 points per game last Spring. The D-Line weights got my fired up, with basically everyone returning, can the defense be a legitimate strength? Get down to that 15 to 17 point average. 

It's the time of year where we can be optimistic and drink the green Koolaid, and I will take a drink of that!  With pretty much everyone back on D, and guys like Fort and Navratil etc. getting experience last year our two deep should be even better, combined with the increased size and depth on DL.  Our defense should be a strength.  And good news, Rudy hasn't shown back up.....so the offense should still be able to put some points up if the OL plays decent.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all are enamored with the 300 pound lineman, and I believe that Tank was better at 305 than he was at 290.

But...we have 3 guys at 290.

Plus all of them play against a few 300+ OLs in practice. 

Is 10 pounds that big a deal?

Reminds me of MLB. Batter hits 300 he's an all star; bats 290 and he's not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, shep said:

We all are enamored with the 300 pound lineman, and I believe that Tank was better at 305 than he was at 290.

But...we have 3 guys at 290.

Plus all of them play against a few 300+ OLs in practice. 

Is 10 pounds that big a deal?

Reminds me of MLB. Batter hits 300 he's an all star; bats 290 and he's not.

IMO 10 good lbs makes a big difference. Not just strength wise but in the ability to anchor a spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...