bigskyvikes Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Looking ahead to the run-off (which I think we will need), I think the two names that will survive the initial round of voting are Roughriders and Nodaks (Fighting Hawks has fallen out of contention). My thinking is that the Fighting Hawk and North Star voters will swing over to Roughriders and the Sundog voters will swing over to Nodaks. That should give Roughriders the edge in the run-off, as I believe there will be more voters in the Hawks/North Star camp than in the Sundog camp.Prediction:60% Roughriders40% NodaksYou do know that no matter how many times you write this it doesnt mean it wil come true, right? Were you a big fan of Beattlejuice? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericpnelson Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 You do know that no matter how many times you write this it doesnt mean it wil come true, right? Were you a big fan of Beattlejuice? you shouldn't joke about that kinda of stuff. Now this thread can only use that word one more time... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 anyone know how this goes...will und/qualtranics update how many votes have been cast each day (assuming they won't release which one is in the lead during the week) and when would we know if one reached 50%??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoiseInsideMyHead Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 anyone know how this goes...will und/qualtranics update how many votes have been cast each day (assuming they won't release which one is in the lead during the week) and when would we know if one reached 50%??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDBIZ Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 I'm guessing we'll be waiting until at least next week for any results Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4evrSIOUX Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Looking ahead to the run-off (which I think we will need), I think the two names that will survive the initial round of voting are Roughriders and Nodaks (Fighting Hawks has fallen out of contention). My thinking is that the Fighting Hawk and North Star voters will swing over to Roughriders and the Sundog voters will swing over to Nodaks. That should give Roughriders the edge in the run-off, as I believe there will be more voters in the Hawks/North Star camp than in the Sundog camp.Prediction:60% Roughriders40% NodaksWhat do you exactly base this on? Do you have a crystal ball? Seriously, how do you know which name the FH or NS voters will choose? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Looking ahead to the run-off (which I think we will need), I think the two names that will survive the initial round of voting are Roughriders and Nodaks (Fighting Hawks has fallen out of contention). My thinking is that the Fighting Hawk and North Star voters will swing over to Roughriders and the Sundog voter will swing over to Nodaks. That should give Roughriders the edge in the run-off, as I believe there will be more voters in the Hawks/North Star camp than in the Sundog camp.Prediction:60% Roughriders40% Nodaksfixed it for you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the green team Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 The Herald is really digging deep: Anyone have any dirt on Anna Burleson? Or for that matter any employee of The Grand Forks Herald. Maybe its time to start putting the shoe on the other foot...hey if you don't have any dirt on them just make something up...that's pretty much what the Heraldo does now days anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigskyvikes Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 (edited) Anyone have any dirt on Anna Burleson? Or for that matter any employee of The Grand Forks Herald. Maybe its time to start putting the shoe on the other foot...hey if you don't have any dirt on them just make something up...that's pretty much what the Heraldo does now days anyway.Why are so many having a cow about this? You do know they had email and voting clitches right? Some on here even said they got a second email. Seems like a potential huge problem to me? I don't know, could you imagine if Sundogs wins and we find out this did happen?!! Edited October 19, 2015 by bigskyvikes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux>Bison Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 roll DAKS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sioux>Bison Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Anyone have any dirt on Anna Burleson? Or for that matter any employee of The Grand Forks Herald. Maybe its time to start putting the shoe on the other foot...hey if you don't have any dirt on them just make something up...that's pretty much what the Heraldo does now days anyway.sounds like a granola eater to me...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cratter Posted October 19, 2015 Share Posted October 19, 2015 Some on here even said they got a second email. Do you have a link?I haven't see anyone say they got a second email. Yet because Anna is looking for people who have, its sorta implied some people voted twice. Which might happen but I haven't seen any evidence of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigskyvikes Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Do you have a link?I haven't see anyone say they got a second email. Yet because Anna is looking for people who have, its sorta implied some people voted twice. Which might happen but I haven't seen any evidence of it. No, its on this site, I read it earlier and I'm not looking back through all these pages. There might be a better way to get it on here, but i dont know how.The question/post on here said, "did anyone else get a second email to vote". I thought someone was messing around and I just blew right by it. But I did read it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post snooty89 Posted October 20, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted October 20, 2015 If the Fighting Hawks don't make the runoff I will pledge my support for Roughriders. Went back and forth and am actually turned off by the Herald pushing the NoDaks. That is great that members of the athletic community want NoDaks, but in all honesty their vote is no more important than ours. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cratter Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Just curious--did anybody else besides me receive the e-mail from the alumni association last week indicating that they would receive another e-mail with voting instructions within the next few days, and then not receive the second e-mail? And yes, I did check my spam folder, also.This is what you read. We all got the first email. Most of us got the second email with the actual link to vote. Sounds like UND92,96 didn't.That's far from voting twice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VMeister Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 If anyone here votes for Sundogs please have the stones to come forward publicly so that all of us here can ridicule mercilessly!Voted Sundogs. Sioux me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fightingsioux4life Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 You do know that no matter how many times you write this it doesnt mean it wil come true, right? Were you a big fan of Beattlejuice? Hey, if you have predictions of your own, feel free to share them. But savaging my predictions doesn't mean they WON'T come true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueSioux2000 Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Voted Sundogs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigskyvikes Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 This is what you read. We all got the first email. Most of us got the second email with the actual link to vote. Sounds like UND92,96 didn't.That's far from voting twice.No, sorry, thats NOT what I read, but it was around that area. You don't have to believe me I dont care, but since it bothers you so much......keep looking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cratter Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Are people getting two email? Getting to vote twice?The only other thing posted was this...probably based off seeing Anna twitter account? See how these things spread? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cratter Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 No, sorry, thats NOT what I read, but it was around that area. You don't have to believe me I dont care, but since it bothers you so much......keep looking.It sucks having an amazing memory and knowing so far not one person has claimed to have voted twice, but if you want to keep claiming its true go ahead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
82SiouxGuy Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Are people getting two email? Getting to vote twice?I haven't heard of anyone getting two Qualtrics emails yet. Unless maybe they are utilizing an uninterested family or friend's email?These were the 2 emails you saw before the Herald got involved.You do know they had email and voting clitches right? Some on here even said they got a second email. Seems like a potential huge problem to me? I don't know, could you imagine if Sundogs wins and we find out this did happen?!!So far there are ABSOLUTELY NO REPORTS of people actually getting 2 chances to vote. You are creating a rumor. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackheart Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Anyone have any dirt on Anna Burleson? Or for that matter any employee of The Grand Forks Herald. Maybe its time to start putting the shoe on the other foot...hey if you don't have any dirt on them just make something up...that's pretty much what the Heraldo does now days anyway.Maybe the Herald should instruct their writers/bloggers to report on the news. I really don't care what Anna Burleson, Tom Miller or Brad Schlossman have to say about this election. I'll make my own decision without looking to them for guidance...but if they want to whip up a quick story on the incoming hockey freshman or break down our penalty kill, I will be there.:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luapsided Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Nodaks and sundogs would be sabotage 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigskyvikes Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 It sucks having an amazing memory and knowing so far not one person has claimed to have voted twice, but if you want to keep claiming its true go ahead. i didnt claim shyt, I just said that I read it on here, and I did. Your the one with your panties in a bunch. Find it yourself... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.