Wilbur Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 Ludvig was tremendous. Big points at the Herb. 3 Quote
Blackheart Posted January 20 Posted January 20 1 minute ago, Wilbur said: Ludvig was tremendous. Big points at the Herb. I think he's finally feeling better. 1 Quote
siouxfaninseattle Posted January 20 Posted January 20 1 minute ago, Wilbur said: Ludvig was tremendous. Big points at the Herb. He stole that game. Some huge saves and at great times. 1 Quote
Sodbuster Posted January 20 Posted January 20 1 hour ago, BigGreyAnt41 said: Anybody else notice when it said “Jackson Blake - NDSU” on the screen? Yeah, I did. 1 Quote
tnt Posted January 20 Posted January 20 46 minutes ago, jk said: Best part about this game is they finally looked like they did a couple months ago, like they can play with anyone. Even when they swept Alaska, they didn't look that great. Tonight wasn't perfect, but it seemed like everyone was fully engaged. They won more battles in the first period than they did in 6+ periods against CC. Also, SC is among the teams that were just clearly better than UND last year, and it sucked to watch those games. So it was nice to not get run over again. Actually, I thought the last 3 times we played them we outplayed them, and the one game in Grand Forks, we outplayed them badly. Quote
Blackheart Posted January 20 Posted January 20 Just now, tnt said: Actually, I thought the last 3 times we played them we outplayed them, and the one game in Grand Forks, we outplayed them badly. Nice to finally get the regulation W! Quote
Blackheart Posted January 20 Posted January 20 1 minute ago, Green Banner said: St Cloud ran into a hot goalie Gonna be a big run on paint thinner in Stearns County tonight... 1 Quote
Popular Post brianvf Posted January 20 Popular Post Posted January 20 Great to get the win tonight. I know we’d all love to see the sweep, but any points tomorrow would be huge. SCSU is a quality team…winning the series on the road would be great for the Penrose race. That said, I hope they crush them tomorrow. 5 Quote
Popular Post stoneySIOUX Posted January 20 Popular Post Posted January 20 2 hours ago, Siouxperman8 said: Zmolek wouldn't see the ice the rest of the game and sit tomorrow if I was coaching He was so, so, so good tonight. Dumb penalty, yes, but my goodness you are ignoring his entire game because of this. 5 Quote
stoneySIOUX Posted January 20 Posted January 20 2 hours ago, bcblues said: Didn't the color guy do the color on the Dodgeball movie? Geno needs new shorts!! Quote
stoneySIOUX Posted January 20 Posted January 20 2 hours ago, LuvHockey said: The power play and empty net play on that ice looks like a tough defend deal. Bubbs said can’t get box too spread out and open lanes. But not pressuring puck allows so much time to set things up. Can’t do both! Overall we did well enough but I sure was on edge of my seat during that play. Tough to not give up lanes when it was 6 on 4. Can't play a heavy pressure PK when down 2 men. Quote
Siouxperman8 Posted January 20 Posted January 20 6 hours ago, stoneySIOUX said: Tough to not give up lanes when it was 6 on 4. Can't play a heavy pressure PK when down 2 men. In the broadcast they said the goalie was back in for the pp so would have been 5 on 4. Who knows if those dopes were right. 1 Quote
I Ranger Posted January 20 Posted January 20 9 hours ago, Oxbow6 said: I'd love to see the 5th centering Perron and Strinden on the 3rd line. Strinden just makes plays. Yeah I wouldn't mind this and have been saying these two have been held back a bit by their line combos. Strinden could even still center and Jammer could play wing. You could maybe even try Kunz with Strinden and Perron but he is just such a poor skater that he would be left behind by those two. Schmaltz is a great team guy, PK'er and defensively responsible center but has very little offensive upside. He fits the 4th line center role more so than Strinden but like someone mentioned(Oxbow I think it may have been you) a while back when I was giving my take on lines that no way Berry moves Schmaltz to the 4th line even though that is where he fits in this lineup now. 3 Quote
SIOUXELEVENS Posted January 20 Posted January 20 Jammer-Strinden -Perron Albrecht Schmaltz-Kunz/ness 4 Quote
dden3 Posted January 20 Posted January 20 We have been fortunate on the injury front. Strinden and the other guys down the line chart will get their chance if we start having injury problems. Quote
cowboys5xsbs Posted January 20 Posted January 20 Everyone who was calling for Perssons job last week I hope you eat that crow he is a good goalie 1 Quote
AJS Posted January 20 Posted January 20 32 minutes ago, SIOUXELEVENS said: Jammer-Strinden -Perron Albrecht Schmaltz-Kunz/ness Seems like such an obvious combo. Too simplistic of a take ( @burd ), but I cannot figure out ( & @Oxbow6 is right on) why Berry refuses to put Schmaltz as the 4th line C. For those saying it’s his Face Off %. I believe he has the lowest of the 4 that were Centers last night. 1 Quote
AJS Posted January 20 Posted January 20 Perrson was excellent & I forgot who said it, but I agree that this felt like the team we watched in the 1st half. Great road W last night! Quote
Wilbur Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 How good was Salquist last night? The Red River to Stearns County pipeline I guess. Quote
Blackheart Posted January 20 Posted January 20 8 hours ago, stoneySIOUX said: Geno needs new shorts!! 1 Quote
Godsmack Posted January 20 Posted January 20 23 minutes ago, Wilbur said: How good was Salquist last night? The Red River to Stearns County pipeline I guess. He had a nice one-timer goal. Quote
burd Posted January 20 Posted January 20 1 hour ago, AJS said: Seems like such an obvious combo. Too simplistic of a take ( @burd ), but I cannot figure out ( & @Oxbow6 is right on) why Berry refuses to put Schmaltz as the 4th line C. For those saying it’s his Face Off %. I believe he has the lowest of the 4 that were Centers last night. I don't see it as too simplistic if your position is hased on some hockey facts or factors, which I think yours is. 1 Quote
Oxbow6 Posted January 20 Posted January 20 1 hour ago, AJS said: Seems like such an obvious combo. Too simplistic of a take ( @burd ), but I cannot figure out ( & @Oxbow6 is right on) why Berry refuses to put Schmaltz as the 4th line C. For those saying it’s his Face Off %. I believe he has the lowest of the 4 that were Centers last night. Again we are all just fans with limited actually hockey knowledge......however there is still something to say about the eyeball test game after game after game. Screw @stoneySIOUX metrics! My eyes tell me Perron needs to be a top 6 guy. My eyes tell me Strinden needs more ice time. Creating chances and scoring goals matters. 3 Quote
burd Posted January 20 Posted January 20 2 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said: Again we are all just fans with limited actually hockey knowledge......however there is still something to say about the eyeball test game after game after game. Screw @stoneySIOUX metrics! My eyes tell me Perron needs to be a top 6 guy. My eyes tell me Strinden needs more ice time. Creating chances and scoring goals matters. Having Perron on your line is a little like having R Grimaldi on it. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.