Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

2022-23 University of North Dakota Hockey Season


Frozen4sioux

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

It's expected. So why aren't they performing to expectations? There's the frustration. 

That's my frustration, too. I was referring to the idea of people getting mad about xG and analytics being used to explain what's going on. It's an odd boogeyman that people don't like, for some reason. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said:

It's almost like some are saying, nope, I'm NOT gonna look for hope. No upside. No positive things. I refuse to think this team could possibly be good in the future this season. Very odd.

You must be new here.....
Only doom and gloom allowed! Fire everyone!

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said:

That's my frustration, too. I was referring to the idea of people getting mad about xG and analytics being used to explain what's going on. It's an odd boogeyman that people don't like, for some reason. 

So like xG the boogeyman is "real" too?  Good thing I didn't know about these things as a child......I would have had to sleep with the lights on! :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said:

So like xG the boogeyman is "real" too?  Good thing I didn't know about these things as a child......I would have had to sleep with the lights on! :wink:

I mean, you tell me lol. You're one so apparently afraid that there could be REAL statistics :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stoneySIOUX said:

I mean, you tell me lol. You're one so apparently afraid that there could be REAL statistics :blink:

Statistics are real......I like those. As an example UND has the worst save% in the nation. That is real. That is factual.

xG is an analytic which is a "coulda, shoulda, woulda".....it is not real. 13-4 record today based on xG per Schloss is not real. It is a unicorn wish.

Nothing says we all have to see this one way or the other.

Statistics and analytics are not the same thing. The Goggle even says so.

We can on and on about this but until this team wins games in this series a 15-4 xG record won't mean anything if they leave WMU 6-10-3. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said:

Statistics are real......I like those. As an example UND has the worst save% in the nation. That is real. That is factual.

xG is an analytic which is a "coulda, shoulda, woulda".....it is not real. 13-4 record today based on xG per Schloss is not real. It is a unicorn wish.

Statistics and analytics are not the same thing. The Goggle even says so.

We can on and on about this but until this team wins games in this series a 15-4 xG record won't mean anything if they leave WMU 6-10-3. 

See, that's where you are presuming. No one is saying these analytics mean anything other than that it's unfortunate we're in that position. It's saying that if UND wasn't the outlier, we'd be in a much better position. They are the outlier, so we're in a poor position. It's really all it is.

Day-in-and-day-out in sports there are stories like "coulda, woulda, shoulda" and no one bats an eye. So, when stuff like this is presented, instead of insulting it, understand the reasoning for it. Call it an excuse if you want, but these are real numbers. 

All good, man. I get you don't dig xG. It's fine. Let's move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said:

xG is an analytic which is a "coulda, shoulda, woulda".....it is not real. 13-4 record today based on xG per Schloss is not real. It is a unicorn wish.

So is the entire Pairwise Ranking system.  The algorithm takes two teams that possibly haven't ever played and determines which one is better based on a bunch of metrics and some made up numbers.  That's the same thing as xG.  It's using other statistics to make a prediction on performance.  

Now if somebody suggests anybody hang a banner because "xG said we really had the best record this year", then those people should be locked in a padded room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Oxbow6 said:

Statistics are real......I like those. As an example UND has the worst save% in the nation. That is real. That is factual.

xG is an analytic which is a "coulda, shoulda, woulda".....it is not real. 13-4 record today based on xG per Schloss is not real. It is a unicorn wish.

Nothing says we all have to see this one way or the other.

Statistics and analytics are not the same thing. The Goggle even says so.

We can on and on about this but until this team wins games in this series a 15-4 xG record won't mean anything if they leave WMU 6-10-3. 

Sadly statistics do not get you in the national tournament.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking to the second half, there are two ways the team can play well and make the NCAA tournament.  First, they can win enough to move up to the right side of the PWR bubble.  When I look at the schedule, it looks tough to get there.  Every league opponent is challenging.  I can see them playing over 0.500, but that not being enough.  On the other hand, they inexplicably surged last year, so they can do it.

The other way is to get to fourth in the NCHC, win a best of three at home against an equally desperate team, and then win against two very good teams (probably Denver and SC) in St. Paul.  I can see them getting home ice.  If they can play like they just did, and improve on it, they can easily move up the standings.  Winning two in a row in the Final Five?  It's not an impossible task, but not easy.  Check with the hockey gods and DeRidder.  

If they're not playing well enough to get home ice, it's more into miracle territory.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the first half of the season, they are currently sitting at 23rd in the PWR and 7th in the NCHC standings. 7-8-4 (3-5-2) record, not great. Taking a page from @jk post, what needs to happen in the 2nd half. 

They are in a pretty bad spot, but the results @ Western might have saved the season. I believe that's how close they were to the ledge of the season being more or less over from a practical making the playoffs standpoint. 

Let's start with the Pairwise. Their RPI is currently .5242 (23rd). The 24th place team is .5083. They are RPI points wise as close to 17th as they are to 24th. The NCHC standings. They are only 3 points away from the 4th place team. They aren't in a great spot, clearly, but they are closer to the surface then we might think.

My ultimate reason for optimism, is this team has the talent. That has never been the issue. The pieces are there defensively / in net (DeRidder) to turn that very negative first half performance into a positive. We just saw a glimpse in Western. Where I might disagree with @jk is I think the 2nd half of the schedule is favorable. 5 Home vs 3 Road series. The road series @ Denver (tough as it gets), but then @ CC, @ Miami. Although favorable to really turn things around, they would have too more or less have to use the formula that would win the league (win home games, split on the road). 13-3. That would get them on the right side of the PWR and clearly home ice as well. I would think 12-4 would do it too, would 11-5? 

I do feel confident that they'll be able to get home ice. I also feel confident that they'll put themselves in position to make it at the very least interesting (in the mix) for an at large bid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AJS said:

After the first half of the season, they are currently sitting at 23rd in the PWR and 7th in the NCHC standings. 7-8-4 (3-5-2) record, not great. Taking a page from @jk post, what needs to happen in the 2nd half. 

They are in a pretty bad spot, but the results @ Western might have saved the season. I believe that's how close they were to the ledge of the season being more or less over from a practical making the playoffs standpoint. 

Let's start with the Pairwise. Their RPI is currently .5242 (23rd). The 24th place team is .5083. They are RPI points wise as close to 17th as they are to 24th. The NCHC standings. They are only 3 points away from the 4th place team. They aren't in a great spot, clearly, but they are closer to the surface then we might think.

My ultimate reason for optimism, is this team has the talent. That has never been the issue. The pieces are there defensively / in net (DeRidder) to turn that very negative first half performance into a positive. We just saw a glimpse in Western. Where I might disagree with @jk is I think the 2nd half of the schedule is favorable. 5 Home vs 3 Road series. The road series @ Denver (tough as it gets), but then @ CC, @ Miami. Although favorable to really turn things around, they would have too more or less have to use the formula that would win the league (win home games, split on the road). 13-3. That would get them on the right side of the PWR and clearly home ice as well. I would think 12-4 would do it too, would 11-5? 

I do feel confident that they'll be able to get home ice. I also feel confident that they'll put themselves in position to make it at the very least interesting (in the mix) for an at large bid. 

Problem with a "favorable" schedule is that it is harder to move up in the pairwise.   Win and go nowhere; lose and fall.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the mid-season break:

  • Games: 19 games (plus one exhibition) completed. 16 games (plus one exhibition) to go.
  • Record: 7-8-4 overall. 3-5-2 in conference. 4-4-1 at home. 3-3-3 on the road. 0-1-0 on neutral ice.
  • Points leaders: Blake (21), Jandric (20), Gaber (19).
  • Goals leaders: Gaber (11), Blake (9), Hain (8), Caulfield (7).
  • Assists leaders: Jandric (18), Blake (12), Gaber (8), McLaughlin (8).
  • Plus/minus leaders: Caulfield (+7), Jandric (+5), James (+4), Sidorski (+4).
  • Plus/minus laggards: Frisch (-9), McLaughlin (-8), Blake (-7), Kleven (-7).
  • Goaltending:
    • DeRidder 2.86 GAA, .890 SV%, over 671 minutes.
    • Hellsten, 3.13 GAA, .859 SV%, over 479 minutes.
  • Team Scoring: 3.4 Goals/Game (10th nationally)
  • Team Defense:
    • 3.2 Goals Allowed/Game (45th nationally)
    • .873 SV% (59th nationally)
  • Special teams:
    • PP: 28.0% (3rd nationally)
    • PK: 89.4% (10th nationally)
  • Face-offs: 53.1% (11th nationally) 
  • Penalty minutes per game: 10.3 (36th nationally)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Kevin G said:

 

  • Plus/minus laggards: Frisch (-9), McLaughlin (-8), Blake (-7), Kleven (-7).

 

I'm going to make a bold speculative guess:

I'd bet Frisch/Kleven are out with McLaughlin and Blake more often than not and two defensemen can't cover for the defensive shortcomings of two freshmen forwards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, burd said:

Problem with a "favorable" schedule is that it is harder to move up in the pairwise.   Win and go nowhere; lose and fall.  

Agreed. Small sample size but getting a Tie / Win on the road against a decent team and moving down this past weekend was not what you wanted to see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, AJS said:

Agreed. Small sample size but getting a Tie / Win on the road against a decent team and moving down this past weekend was not what you wanted to see. 

Need all of the NCHC teams to do really well in the last non-conference series or two.  

CC has Princeton

DU has Lindenwood and Alaska Fairbanks

Miami has Niagara

Duluth has St. Thomas and Bemidji State

Omaha has St. Lawrence

St. Cloud has Minnesota

Western Michigan has Michigan Tech and TBD in GLI

and as everyone has expressed we have to beat Lindenwood.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Sicatoka said:

I'm going to make a bold speculative guess:

I'd bet Frisch/Kleven are out with McLaughlin and Blake more often than not and two defensemen can't cover for the defensive shortcomings of two freshmen forwards. 

DING DING^^^^^^^^^^Winner winner chicken dinner!!! Totally agree with this statement!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AJS said:

Agreed. Small sample size but getting a Tie / Win on the road against a decent team and moving down this past weekend was not what you wanted to see. 

Western Michigan is a decent team but they weren’t that much ahead of us in the PWR going into the weekend so I’m not sure how much we could have moved up even if we had swept. Just gotta keep banking some wins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Sicatoka said:

I'm going to make a bold speculative guess:

I'd bet Frisch/Kleven are out with McLaughlin and Blake more often than not and two defensemen can't cover for the defensive shortcomings of two freshmen forwards. 

Like Gino always said, the freshman need to grow some whiskers as the season goes on.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...