Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

NORTH DAKOTA @ DU - FRIDAY Gameday


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Godsmack said:

Wow, did anyone catch Coach Montgomery after he shook hands with the North Dakota coaching staff?!?! He absolutely lost his marbles, yelling at the officials. 

DU’s problem at this point is their own arrogance, not the officials. 

(Unless it was about kicking guys out of the faceoff- because then I’d agree) 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, siouxforce19 said:

DU’s problem at this point is their own arrogance, not the officials. 

(Unless it was about kicking guys out of the faceoff- because then I’d agree) 

 

The announcers speculated that it was the faceoff thing, I believe.

Posted
9 hours ago, yzerman19 said:

I'm out.  Good luck.  I can't watch this garbage.  I'd rather watch WHL...this SIoux team is the worst that I've seen since I started paying attention again when Parise showed up.

Perhaps you should stick to the sports you know like maybe Bouncy Ball?

Posted
5 hours ago, 90siouxfan said:

Hope Lex Luther has a miserable nights sleep, lol

Lexluthor-secretorigin.jpg.373561f33acdb9346278ab520c016266.jpg

I believe his wife just had a baby so he won’t have many good nights sleeps for a while. :lol:

Posted

Watched game on Dish TV along the Little Missouri after a day's hunt. One of the better UND come back victories I have seen in a while. Takes the sting of me missing a 5x5 muley with the bow before sunset...........

Posted
4 hours ago, siouxforce19 said:

DU’s problem at this point is their own arrogance, not the officials. 

(Unless it was about kicking guys out of the faceoff- because then I’d agree) 

 

Perhaps he should have voiced his displeasure at the coaches’ meetings. When they found out faceoff encroachment was a point of emphasis for the next season.  8m a little pissed they went with the secondary option for a second violation on the same face off.   Ringing the faceoff to the neutral zone. The primary option is a delay of game penalty. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Vegas_Sioux said:

Perhaps he should have voiced his displeasure at the coaches’ meetings. When they found out faceoff encroachment was a point of emphasis for the next season.  8m a little pissed they went with the secondary option for a second violation on the same face off.   Ringing the faceoff to the neutral zone. The primary option is a delay of game penalty. 

I can’t wait to see them actually call that penalty the way it’s written.  Talk about a coach going nuclear with a “drop the bleeping puck” tirade.  Don’t think I’ve ever seen a second center thrown out to be honest with you. 

Seems like when they throw a center for either team out there is more encroachment on the second time around.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Wilbur said:

I can’t wait to see them actually call that penalty the way it’s written.  Talk about a coach going nuclear with a “drop the bleeping puck” tirade.  Don’t think I’ve ever seen a second center thrown out to be honest with you. 

Seems like when they throw a center for either team out there is more encroachment on the second time around.

 Yep because the coaches know it’s not going to get called.  Last night it got called but baby Shepard neutered the punishment on it. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Godsmack said:

Any video highlights out there? -My pops would like to see the goals.

All goals can be viewed here;  

 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

I’m not sure this is a good look for a college coach. I understand calling out your leaders inside the locker room but publically seems a bit much especially after the last two post game tirads. 

 

“We have a serious lack of commitment to a team-first attitude right now,” Montgomery added. “We have lapses that are ‘oh my god’ bad. It’s happening primarily by returning players that have won championships. We’re not getting led the right way right now.”

https://letsgodu.com/2017/11/17/pioneers-blow-3-0-lead-show-little-life-after-first-period-in-5-4-loss-to-north-dakota/

  • Upvote 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, siouxfaninseattle said:

What is the comment in let'sgodu blog mean? "The roughly 2,000 North Dakota fans (200 fans of a real team)......"???

I think it's a snowflake shot at the number of fans wearing Fighting Hawks gear, while the other 1,800 were wearing Sioux apparel.  

Posted
5 minutes ago, siouxfaninseattle said:

What is the comment in let'sgodu blog mean? "The roughly 2,000 North Dakota fans (200 fans of a real team)......"???

I was wondering that too... but the nickname chirp is really all they’ve got right now. 

Posted
1 minute ago, snova4 said:

I think it's a snowflake shot at the number of fans wearing Fighting Hawks gear, while the other 1,800 were wearing Sioux apparel.  

Ah, that makes sense. I guess since their team didn't take many shots after the first period, they tried to make one in writing.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...