westsidesioux Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 Forced a punt....hopefully Brad is on his way out Quote
CMSioux Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 And I never sensed that they were ND bashing. The one announcer must have a ND connection as he named Medora. Quote
UND-FB-FAN Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 40-7 Final Impressive final score but still a lot of things for this team to work on (ball security, punt return, passing game, etc.) I now await the word on the health of several key players. Big one next week against Southern Utah for homecoming. Pack the Alerus and be loud! UND is 3 - 0 in conference play! Quote
Bin Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 Damned nice win tonight. I really enjoyed the SS announcers. Kept me smiling. Quote
homer Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 21 minutes ago, nodakvindy said: You don't get statement wins against 1-4 teams. Also leaving your starter in a blowout when a team can start getting chippy doesn't make a lot of sense. But if you want to be considered one of the best in the conference, 30 point wins vs. teams like Sac. St are the expectation. You cringe when the starters are out there but I also understand it. 2 Quote
Sioux94 Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 Trying to get the post game audio, but can't get the Listen Live or any other method to work.....probably just my computer....grrrrr. Tried KFRY 550 as well. Oh well. Quote
Cratter Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 Just now, Sioux94 said: Trying to get the post game audio, but can't get the Listen Live or any other method to work.....probably just my computer....grrrrr. Tried KFRY 550 as well. Oh well. I'm listening to fox on I heart on computer. Quote
Longtime fan Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 Convincing win!! Exactly what what they needed. S Utah will be a big big game next week and need the alerus to be rocking! 4-2 3-0 big sky with a 4 win streak. MOMENTUM!! Great win Quote
Sioux>Bison Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 Great win Hawks! Keep the improvement up and watch this team grow. I really want to be traveling to GF this December for something not hockey related! Quote
Cratter Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 22 minutes ago, homer said: But if you want to be considered one of the best in the conference, 30 point wins vs. teams like Sac. St are the expectation. You cringe when the starters are out there but I also understand it. I guess they wanted to leave no doubt. Quote
Popular Post homer Posted October 9, 2016 Popular Post Posted October 9, 2016 10 minutes ago, Cratter said: I guess they wanted to leave no doubt. This program is competing for recognition nationally and locally. Letting a 30 point lead get cut in half doesn't show as well as a 30 point blowout win heading into homecoming. I have no problem playing the starters a little longer to keep a nice margin of victory. 8 Quote
darell1976 Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 A UND win this Saturday puts us alone in first place as EWU has a bye. Big game, packed house, we need this game to be louder than the Potato Bowl, and Cal Poly combined. I say we win this game we are playoff bound as no one is going to slow this team down. Great blowout win over Sac St. Quote
CMSioux Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 Saw Reyes limp off in fourth quarter but nothing reported hoping that is good news. With our best players on the field we are a good team, a very good team according to Sac announcers. Quote
Oxbow6 Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 422 yards on the ground plus 200+ thru the air......that's an offensive performance! Kudos to Rudulph and players. 1 Quote
Oxbow6 Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 Read lots of complaints about the Sac St. announcers but Jack Michaels is just brutal to listen to. It is one outdated cliché after another with him. Outside of a listening audience in rural white bread America (cliché I know) no one could make sense of him. "He was on him like white on rice"........really? Really??? Quote
Oxbow6 Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 1 hour ago, CMSioux said: Saw Reyes limp off in fourth quarter but nothing reported hoping that is good news. With our best players on the field we are a good team, a very good team according to Sac announcers. My insiders say thigh bruise. Quote
UNDColorado Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 6 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said: My insiders say thigh bruise. That is what I was hoping for! Quote
UNDColorado Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 We needed a 30+ point win. Even though it is only Sac St it will matter in the eyes of a committee. This game was fun to watch but the real test to see if we are a playoff worthy team will be taking care of SUU at home next week. Heal up and have a good week of practice. Quote
UND-FB-FAN Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 UND took care of business like we expect a well-run UND team to do to a team like Sac State - congrats Bubba and team! Now into a big one at the Alerus for homecoming! Pack the place and let's be loud for the defense! SUU is no slouch; they are having a good season too. Quote
Siouxperman8 Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 40 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said: Read lots of complaints about the Sac St. announcers but Jack Michaels is just brutal to listen to. It is one outdated cliché after another with him. Outside of a listening audience in rural white bread America (cliché I know) no one could make sense of him. "He was on him like white on rice"........really? Really??? I watched on line and listened to Michaels. He is tough to listen to. The camera work was terrible from the Sac St crew. Usually the shot was too tight and you couldn't see where the ball or the runner/receiver ended up. On Studsrud's long TD run we only saw the first 15 yards or so. Quote
Dustin Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 Lots of good things, the combination of which led to a drubbing of a team that, on paper, were supposed to drub. Kudos to the coaches and players for making that happen. With that being said, there is plenty of room for improvement in certain areas, namely place kicking (although he did come back to make all the remaining kicks after missing the first two), kick returns, penalties, and fumbles. Clean those areas up, and we are a contender. #daybyday #leavenodoubt Quote
dakotadan Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 2 hours ago, Oxbow6 said: Read lots of complaints about the Sac St. announcers On the contrary, they were awesome! I chuckled through the entire broadcast. And in a good way. 2 Quote
F'n Hawks Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 I loved the Sac St. Announcers, kept me entertained throughout the game. 1 Quote
Siouxphan27 Posted October 9, 2016 Posted October 9, 2016 3 hours ago, Oxbow6 said: Read lots of complaints about the Sac St. announcers but Jack Michaels is just brutal to listen to. It is one outdated cliché after another with him. Outside of a listening audience in rural white bread America (cliché I know) no one could make sense of him. "He was on him like white on rice"........really? Really??? Jack uses a lot of cliches, but he's excited, into the game, and does a nice job of describing what's going on. Compared to Sweeney last year, Jack is infinitely better. Sweeney was akin to listening to Braille. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.