Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Prospective Recruits


dagies

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

The cities are bountiful; bound to happen. Moorhead/Section 8 would sting.

We haven’t gotten a Twin Cities recruit that didn’t have a connection to the program since Berry took over. 

It is what it is, but I think we’ve gotta start getting some because it impacts getting future recruits from the Cities. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, siouxforce19 said:

We haven’t gotten a Twin Cities recruit that didn’t have a connection to the program since Berry took over. 

It is what it is, but I think we’ve gotta start getting some because it impacts getting future recruits from the Cities. 

I thought Karl might help with recruiting in the Cities, but not so much yet.   Hopefully we can nab a few still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, siouxforce19 said:

We haven’t gotten a Twin Cities recruit that didn’t have a connection to the program since Berry took over. 

It is what it is, but I think we’ve gotta start getting some because it impacts getting future recruits from the Cities. 

Lucia's insistence on cooling off the rivalry is partly to blame. Having games there on the schedule is a big deal. Heck, let's go beat up on St. Thomas after they open their new rink.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious from the perspective of others, with the list that is down to 5 - what would feel like "success"?  We weren't going to go 6 for 6.  Since these 5 are decent possibilities what would be the hope/expectations? 5 for 5, 2 for 5, 1 for 5 - maybe depending on which ones?  Just curious.  I don't post but I read most of these and can tend to get disappointed if I have high expectations/hopes but the reality is not there :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Youldy said:

Just curious from the perspective of others, with the list that is down to 5 - what would feel like "success"?  We weren't going to go 6 for 6.  Since these 5 are decent possibilities what would be the hope/expectations? 5 for 5, 2 for 5, 1 for 5 - maybe depending on which ones?  Just curious.  I don't post but I read most of these and can tend to get disappointed if I have high expectations/hopes but the reality is not there :unsure:

If we get one of the ones I’m thinking we have not a good chance at I’ll chalk that up as a win even if we miss on some others. I love a good surprise. 
 

Realistically, I’d also say we can maybe get 2 from the list and I’d take it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Youldy said:

Just curious from the perspective of others, with the list that is down to 5 - what would feel like "success"?  We weren't going to go 6 for 6.  Since these 5 are decent possibilities what would be the hope/expectations? 5 for 5, 2 for 5, 1 for 5 - maybe depending on which ones?  Just curious.  I don't post but I read most of these and can tend to get disappointed if I have high expectations/hopes but the reality is not there :unsure:

I'm in the camp of 0 for 5 is extremely disappointing. 1 for 5 is necessary. 2 for 5 you're feeling good. Anything more you're ecstatic. I also feel like although UND is Top 3 for Eiserman, that one is an extreme long shot.

That list are ones I'm confident Berry is actively recruiting and there is mutual interest. There could be others (ex: Mac Swanson / Diego Buttazzoni) that are really good players, but not sure where they would stand.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AJS said:

I'm in the camp of 0 for 5 is extremely disappointing. 1 for 5 is necessary. 2 for 5 you're feeling good. Anything more you're ecstatic. I also feel like although UND is Top 3 for Eiserman, that one is an extreme long shot.

That list are ones I'm confident Berry is actively recruiting and there is mutual interest. There could be others (ex: Mac Swanson / Diego Buttazzoni) that are really good players, but not sure where they would stand.

 

 

Diego Buttazzoni?? Ok.... so, we have to have this guy on our team. I don't even care if he's any good :lol:

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said:

Diego Buttazzoni?? Ok.... so, we have to have this guy on our team. I don't even care if he's any good :lol:

If the "G-Man" was still at DU he'd surely land him. Gwoz's teams always had the most interesting nameplates. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...