Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, scpa0305 said:

Doubtful we were in on him, but Theo Kiss to UMASS

Oh, the jokes he is going to be taunted by there...   U can Kiss M-ass!

Posted
On 8/17/2022 at 9:00 AM, AJS said:

Updating this list to add Eiserman.

  • Keith McInnis 
  • Danny Nelson 
  • EJ Emery 
  • Will Zellers 
  • Brendan McMorrow
  • Cole Eiserman

McMorrow to Denver

Posted
1 hour ago, I Ranger said:

McMorrow to Denver

UND was never going to go 6 for 6, but this one is tough. Losing a Minnesota guy to Denver is brutal. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Denver’s on a heater…good players coming in their this year. Carle has a reputation for letting skilled players play free. That can be important from a development standpoint. They’ve also been very good the past 5-7 years. 

Posted
32 minutes ago, gfhockey said:

Did we even want him 

Having never seen him play, his numbers don’t exactly jump off the page coming from MN HS hockey as a forward. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, brianvf said:

Having never seen him play, his numbers don’t exactly jump off the page coming from MN HS hockey as a forward. 

He’s going to the NTDP so he has to be decent. 

Posted
1 hour ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

The cities are bountiful; bound to happen. Moorhead/Section 8 would sting.

We haven’t gotten a Twin Cities recruit that didn’t have a connection to the program since Berry took over. 

It is what it is, but I think we’ve gotta start getting some because it impacts getting future recruits from the Cities. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, siouxforce19 said:

We haven’t gotten a Twin Cities recruit that didn’t have a connection to the program since Berry took over. 

It is what it is, but I think we’ve gotta start getting some because it impacts getting future recruits from the Cities. 

I thought Karl might help with recruiting in the Cities, but not so much yet.   Hopefully we can nab a few still.

Posted
3 hours ago, siouxforce19 said:

We haven’t gotten a Twin Cities recruit that didn’t have a connection to the program since Berry took over. 

It is what it is, but I think we’ve gotta start getting some because it impacts getting future recruits from the Cities. 

Lucia's insistence on cooling off the rivalry is partly to blame. Having games there on the schedule is a big deal. Heck, let's go beat up on St. Thomas after they open their new rink.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Just curious from the perspective of others, with the list that is down to 5 - what would feel like "success"?  We weren't going to go 6 for 6.  Since these 5 are decent possibilities what would be the hope/expectations? 5 for 5, 2 for 5, 1 for 5 - maybe depending on which ones?  Just curious.  I don't post but I read most of these and can tend to get disappointed if I have high expectations/hopes but the reality is not there :unsure:

Posted

A year ago we "made hay". That plays into recruiting (and recruits) this year. 

Knowing that, if UND lands one of those last five I'm good.
Land two and I'm smirking. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Youldy said:

Just curious from the perspective of others, with the list that is down to 5 - what would feel like "success"?  We weren't going to go 6 for 6.  Since these 5 are decent possibilities what would be the hope/expectations? 5 for 5, 2 for 5, 1 for 5 - maybe depending on which ones?  Just curious.  I don't post but I read most of these and can tend to get disappointed if I have high expectations/hopes but the reality is not there :unsure:

If we get one of the ones I’m thinking we have not a good chance at I’ll chalk that up as a win even if we miss on some others. I love a good surprise. 
 

Realistically, I’d also say we can maybe get 2 from the list and I’d take it. 

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Youldy said:

Just curious from the perspective of others, with the list that is down to 5 - what would feel like "success"?  We weren't going to go 6 for 6.  Since these 5 are decent possibilities what would be the hope/expectations? 5 for 5, 2 for 5, 1 for 5 - maybe depending on which ones?  Just curious.  I don't post but I read most of these and can tend to get disappointed if I have high expectations/hopes but the reality is not there :unsure:

I'm in the camp of 0 for 5 is extremely disappointing. 1 for 5 is necessary. 2 for 5 you're feeling good. Anything more you're ecstatic. I also feel like although UND is Top 3 for Eiserman, that one is an extreme long shot.

That list are ones I'm confident Berry is actively recruiting and there is mutual interest. There could be others (ex: Mac Swanson / Diego Buttazzoni) that are really good players, but not sure where they would stand.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, AJS said:

I'm in the camp of 0 for 5 is extremely disappointing. 1 for 5 is necessary. 2 for 5 you're feeling good. Anything more you're ecstatic. I also feel like although UND is Top 3 for Eiserman, that one is an extreme long shot.

That list are ones I'm confident Berry is actively recruiting and there is mutual interest. There could be others (ex: Mac Swanson / Diego Buttazzoni) that are really good players, but not sure where they would stand.

 

 

Diego Buttazzoni?? Ok.... so, we have to have this guy on our team. I don't even care if he's any good :lol:

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Thanks for the replies and thoughts.  Much appreciated and helpful.  This is a fun thread to follow.  Thanks to all of those who update this and it will be exciting to see how things play out.

Posted
9 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said:

Diego Buttazzoni?? Ok.... so, we have to have this guy on our team. I don't even care if he's any good :lol:

If the "G-Man" was still at DU he'd surely land him. Gwoz's teams always had the most interesting nameplates. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

If the "G-Man" was still at DU he'd surely land him. Gwoz's teams always had the most interesting nameplates. 

I always thought that was CC's thing. Wamzgans always stood out to me lol.

Posted
2 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said:

I always thought that was CC's thing. Wamzgans always stood out to me lol.

I raise you a Ruegesegger and a Rakhshani. Don't make me go all Wallinheimo on you. I have a Popadynetz and a Dubielwicz after that. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

I raise you a Ruegesegger and a Rakhshani. Don't make me go all Wallinheimo on you. I have a Popadynetz and a Dubielwicz after that. 

Hey man, I'll give it a go.... 

Sweatt, Vlassopolous, Crabb, Testawuide, Krushelnyski, Stowkewych, Duggie Lagrone, Fejes, Kivihalme, Gooch, Cruickshank ... I left a couple of good ones out, too!

 

Posted

Release the Testwuide! 

Paukovich, Dingle, Wiercioch, Olszewski, Doremus, Mermis, Olkinuora, 

All on Gwozdecki teams. 

 

Whenever they'd say "Dingle" I'd say "berry" under my breath. 
Whenever they'd say "Wiercioch" I'd say "he's got a what?" 

Posted
1 hour ago, AJS said:

I'm in the camp of 0 for 5 is extremely disappointing. 1 for 5 is necessary. 2 for 5 you're feeling good. Anything more you're ecstatic. I also feel like although UND is Top 3 for Eiserman, that one is an extreme long shot.

That list are ones I'm confident Berry is actively recruiting and there is mutual interest. There could be others (ex: Mac Swanson / Diego Buttazzoni) that are really good players, but not sure where they would stand.

 

 

Eiserman doesn't follow UND on IG. That tells you all you need to know.

He follows BU and Minnesota.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...