Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, Sioux94 said:

I did actually take a short clip of it last night when watching. Geaux_Sioux respect your opinion but I disagree on this one, not a case of Maag being soft, this should have been a penalty.  I guess you could maybe say the DB didn't think the play was over....but I'm not buying that. 

He didn’t think the play was over. It was questionable that he was down to me. My issue is that he holds his hands up and looks at the refs instead of showing the DB that he will be the alpha all day. He got punked. Get in his face, don’t shove him, but let him know.

Posted

Ok now I remember this play. Call me a homer here, but I see this as the DB not thinking Maag was down, which it appears he actually wasn’t. Maag reacted as a player who wasn’t giving himself up when he popped up, the DB interpreted him popping up as him trying to continue running and finished the tackle. I don’t see any issue here.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

And if you think Maag wasn’t going to continue to run, where exactly do you say he was going here when he continues running? He didn’t run towards an official or even turn his attention to the official to hand the ball. My take is Maag didn’t think he was down either and planned to run up the field.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Bison06 said:

Ok now I remember this play. Call me a homer here, but I see this as the DB not thinking Maag was down, which it appears he actually wasn’t. Maag reacted as a player who wasn’t giving himself up when he popped up, the DB interpreted him popping up as him trying to continue running and finished the tackle. I don’t see any issue here.

Agree 

Posted

Maag's elbows were down and possibly a knee and a hip.  It looks like Maag is attempting to run towards the middle of the field (the huddle) rather than up the sideline.  Bison #1's body language says he was upset about Maag catching a ball, not that he was trying to make a tackle.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, jdub27 said:

That's not how yo utake a guy down if you think the play isn't over....

EXACTLY this.  And Maag did get up quick yes, but he was not trying to run towards the goal line.  Also.....when did they change the rules so that the whistle can be blown and the play is over......that as long as in the defenders mind.....they didn't think the play was over.....it's ok to hit someone.  Wasn't aware of that new rule.   But the most telling thing I think is what you said, that is not how you tackle someone when yo think the play is live, he was just f'ing with him.  

  • Upvote 2
Posted

We’ll have to agree to disagree on this one. It’s questionable, but I think if the players were reversed, you’d all be arguing the other side of this one.

Posted
1 minute ago, Bison06 said:

We’ll have to agree to disagree on this one. It’s questionable, but I think if the players were reversed, you’d all be arguing the other side of this one.

No we wouldn't it was cheap.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Nodak78 said:

No we wouldn't it was cheap.

I’ve been trying to be objective here. Call it questionable if you want, but a cheap shot? Not even close. 
If I’m that corner I’m doing the same thing. You keep running, you’re gonna get hit. No question.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Nodak78 said:

No we wouldn't it was cheap.

You and the average bear have very different definitions of what is "cheap" apparently.

 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Bison06 said:

I’ve been trying to be objective here. Call it questionable if you want, but a cheap shot? Not even close. 
If I’m that corner I’m doing the same thing. You keep running, you’re gonna get hit. No question.

I stand by my first post.  Wasn’t the worst thing in the world but was worthy of a penalty and should have stuck with the flag. 
a little questionable with Maag popping up but the play was over. Maag looks like he was extending the ball to flip to the referee. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Siouxperman8 said:

I stand by my first post.  Wasn’t the worst thing in the world but was worthy of a penalty and should have stuck with the flag. 
a little questionable with Maag popping up but the play was over. Maag looks like he was extending the ball to flip to the referee. 

Fair enough.

What is your assessment of why the flag was picked up?

Posted
1 hour ago, UNDBIZ said:

Maag's elbows were down and possibly a knee and a hip.  It looks like Maag is attempting to run towards the middle of the field (the huddle) rather than up the sideline.  Bison #1's body language says he was upset about Maag catching a ball, not that he was trying to make a tackle.

BS. Guarantee you Maeg tries to continue running if he is not tackled again. He is not getting up to run back to the huddle and they are not in a hurry up offense. He was trying to get on SC like Belquist did earlier this season. 

  • Downvote 3
Posted
16 minutes ago, Bison06 said:

Lol, this made me laugh. Good work.

Lol. That play meant nothing and is worthless.  The plays where NDSU ran for tons of yards meant something.  

  • Upvote 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, Bison06 said:

Fair enough.

What is your assessment of why the flag was picked up?

I think the db knew enough go over the line but hold back a little so it wasn’t totally egregious.  In my opinion - Once it was called it should have stuck 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Bison06 said:

We’ll have to agree to disagree on this one. It’s questionable, but I think if the players were reversed, you’d all be arguing the other side of this one.

An official was right there. Did and when did the whistle blow. 

Posted

#1's body language tells me he knew it was worthy of a penalty. He wasn't celebrating with his teammates; he was pissed off.

If Maag was trying to extend the play, why was he going directly toward two Bison coming in to high five #1?

The ref was already coming out to spot the ball. So, the ref, and two of #1's teammates knew the play was over when he flipped Maag. So, the whistle had already blown? That's roughing, isn't it?

This is an honest question. I'm not a super-duper-football mind like so many people around here; Even if the play isn't over, is this a legal tackle? I thought you couldn't lift someone off the ground in the course of tackling them.

Either way, this play doesn't change the outcome. It's still interesting to debate interpretation of the rules, though.

Posted
32 minutes ago, N of GF said:

#1's body language tells me he knew it was worthy of a penalty. He wasn't celebrating with his teammates; he was pissed off.

If Maag was trying to extend the play, why was he going directly toward two Bison coming in to high five #1?

The ref was already coming out to spot the ball. So, the ref, and two of #1's teammates knew the play was over when he flipped Maag. So, the whistle had already blown? That's roughing, isn't it?

This is an honest question. I'm not a super-duper-football mind like so many people around here; Even if the play isn't over, is this a legal tackle? I thought you couldn't lift someone off the ground in the course of tackling them.

Either way, this play doesn't change the outcome. It's still interesting to debate interpretation of the rules, though.

You can’t pick somebody up and body slam them. Grabbing a leg is not a penalty.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...