UNDhoops Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 someone can (and should) check my math, but according to wikipedia 43 D1 schools have switched from native american nicknames. 18 of those went to birds. 12 of those went to some form of hawks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Risky Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 From the very beginning they said there had to be a 50% majority to become the new nickname. With 3 names in their now how many votes will it take to get that 50%? I think they would have to live by what they had said. Eventually they will have to narrow it down to 2. I did think we had done that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodakhoops Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 (edited) Having voted for Nodaks I'm actually not pleased that the rules were changed to allow the choice on the ballot, but I think I can understand why. Kelley's created a s-storm by changing the rules now, but he likely avoided another by a constituency that really wants Nodaks as the final choice. Being the tally was quite close, I can see some logic in that decision.That said, from my perspective this is decision only make it more likely Fighting Hawks ends up winning. I suspect most Nodak and RR voter would vote for the other one, rather than Fighting Hawks. So if Nodaks didn't make the cut, I'm guessing most of those votes would go to RR. Hopefully enough to win the final vote. Similarly, had the tables been turned and Nodaks was #2 and RR #3, I suspect RR voters would have voted for Nodaks. I'd be happy to vote RR to keep Fighting Hawks from being the final selection. Unfortunately now I am afraid that there will be voters cancelling each other out to the benefit of Fighting Hawks. I also think Kelley is making a big mistake by not requiring the final selection to have 50% or more of the vote. I don't care if that does extend the process, I'll be a lot more made if Fighting Hawks is chosen by 40% of voters while 60% wanted anything else. To me that's not a good way to select a nickname and will lead to lingering bad feelings (yes, I know, any choice will). This isn't that far fetched. I don't think it's out of the question to say FH is the top choice for Kelly and the consultants of the final 3. Nodaks was the favorite choice of the most visible group on campus in Brad Berry and the hockey team. Keeping it on keeps that group quiet and virtually ensures a FH win.It doesn't take a genius to study those results and realize keeping 3 ensures a FH victory. Going with 2 leaves a big chance RR could win and we know how the consultants feel about that name. Edited October 26, 2015 by nodakhoops Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teeder11 Posted October 26, 2015 Author Share Posted October 26, 2015 thank you mrs. kelly. you may leave the state anytime now and return to your commune at cal-berkleyyou mean, New Mexico....that's where they are from, and that's where they are headed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
best0186 Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 I voted for Nodaks and am irate that the process has been changed. This is insanity. I have wrote an email to the president, Peter Johnson, and the Alumni Association. By changing the rules there is no integrity (if there ever was any) to the process. This is is turning into such a rigged vote. Before, I thought that there was no way to screw the voting process up, boy was I wrong. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackheart Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 I voted for Nodaks and am irate that the process has been changed. This is insanity. I have wrote an email to the president, Peter Johnson, and the Alumni Association. By changing the rules there is no integrity (if there ever was any) to the process. This is is turning into such a rigged vote. Before, I thought that there was no way to screw the voting process up, boy was I wrong.I just wrote them a note as well...how about everyone on here send them an email and let them know how you feel?robert.kelley@UND.edupeter.johnson@UND.edu 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obborg Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 It's amazing how many of us seem to instinctively sense some behind-the-scenes manipulation at play here, although each person creates his/her own narrative to explain the situation. In my version, this latest twist is simply a show put on to appear impartial. (Just like his move when he "considered" re-instating no-nickname.) If I am right, Nodaks is already dead and will be voluntarily removed before the final vote. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxbow6 Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 From the very beginning they said there had to be a 50% majority to become the new nickname. With 3 names in their now how many votes will it take to get that 50%? I think they would have to live by what they had said. Eventually they will have to narrow it down to 2. I did think we had done that.At this point receiving 50+% of the vote is paramount at some stage to make this process looks even remotely legit. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMSioux Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 Just some personal reflections:Fighting Hawks: 6,960 votes; 31.20 percent, as we have heard primarily students who mistakenly believe that the hawk logo that is circulating will be the new logo. Also they love the name because they figure they can scream "Sioux" whenever the announcer says "Fighting....Hawks" Also a #2 option for the tree-huggers and liberals since it can offend no one. Roughriders: 4,687 votes; 21.01 percent: not going to change their vote, only hope for this name is that the sleeping giant is woken up and realizes they will be stuck with Fighting Hawks unless they do something. Nodaks: 4,571 votes; 20.49 percent: not going to change their vote, few outstaters will change their vote to this because they can't relate to the history or the state personally, funny I have yet to talk with someone who was born in North Dakota that see Nodaks as a slur. North Stars: 3,231 votes; 14.48 percent: Gotta be clue-less to pick a name that is synonymous with the state of Minnesota. I also see a majority of them moving to Fighting Hawks once again because it is the least offensive. Sundogs: 2,858 votes; 12.81 percent: these are the tree-huggers, liberal professors and those who are easily entertained that "UND" is ACTUALLY in the name. I would bet that a high percentage of these people won't bother to vote for any of the three finalists but those that do will go Fighting Hawks because it's the least likely to "Offend" someone.So the reality is the highly paid consultants from the east coast will win and accomplish their job which was to make sure that UND ended up with a safe (not unqiue, not creative) new nickname. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeauxSioux Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 (edited) I was in GF for a long weekend and talked to several people about the nickname. The owner of one downtown establishment told me that his unofficial survey of the people who came into his establishment was that Fighting Hawks was the clear choice. I talked to my cousin and he said both of his kids were voting for Fighting Hawks. Another friend asked me if I had seen the cool Fighting Hawk logo. She hadn't seen it, but heard about it. I pulled up the image off the internet and she said that she liked that one a lot. Fighting Hawks seems to be the choice of the young and the ones who like the cool logo, not that UND can use that logo anyway.According to the GFH piece this morning, the 50% majority rule is gone. A while back when the process was being discussed, I brought up the Louisiana "jungle primary", where is wide open to all of the candidates. If no one gets greater than 50% a run-off is held. In the 2014 election Mary Landrieu got the most votes in the jungle primary, but when the final election was held, she got clobbered, because there were two strong candidates from the other party that took each others votes during the jungle primary.The rules were set for this election. If no name got more than 50% of the vote, there would be a run-off between the top 2. To change the rules after the fact, is a farce. If you are going to go forward with this sham, you better plan to have a third vote, if there isn't a name that gets the 50%.Man, this group could mess up a one car parade. Edited October 26, 2015 by GeauxSioux 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnt Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 "Unfortunately now I am afraid that there will be voters cancelling each other out to the benefit of Fighting Hawks." That is why you didn't just take the winner of the Final Five. I can't understand how he doesn't understand the Ross Perot effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeedHockey Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 At this point receiving 50+% of the vote is paramount at some stage to make this process looks even remotely legit.Legitimate?This process stopped being legitimate when North Dakota (no nickname) was stripped from the voting choices. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Cratter Posted October 26, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted October 26, 2015 Legitimate?This process stopped being legitimate when North Dakota (no nickname) was stripped from the voting choices.That's actually when the process to pick a new nickname got legit. 10 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hambone Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 That's actually when the process to pick a new nickname got legit. Yep - that was on of the few things that was done exactly as it was laid out in the process.As with everyone else, I'm very disappointed that the rules changed for this. Nodaks is my least favorite of the three, but I would feel the same no matter what choice came in third. Also, regarding the logo, I think that someone (media or otherwise) needs to make it clear to those voting that the logo floating around cannot be used by UND (if that in fact is the case). Although they could probably come up with a logo similar to the one that is floating around, people should be informed so they don't make a choice on that alone. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nodaker Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 I just wrote them a note as well...how about everyone on here send them an email and let them know how you feel?robert.kelley@UND.edupeter.johnson@UND.eduEmails have been sent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nodaker Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 That's actually when the process to pick a new nickname got legit. Sorry Cratter, didn't mean to hit the neg rep button. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cratter Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 Sorry Cratter, didn't mean to hit the neg rep button.No biggie. I've seen a few people write that to others, but I think people should know that you can switch those now. They aren't set in stone like the old software. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnt Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 Here is the article about those changing Native American nicknames and picking birds or colors. Why are we as a proud institution going to be lemmings and follow down the same path as everybody else. http://www.grandforksherald.com/news/education/3705294-qa-sociologist-suggests-flickertails-und Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnt Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 (edited) Why do schools retiring Native American logos often choose birds?I think they just want to avoid any more controversy at all, so they go with the blandest, most inoffensive, boring name they can, which is typically something like a bird.This is what others think as well. Is this what we want, the blandest and most boring name? This should have been a major warning for us about the committee process. Let's face it, nothing creative was going to come out of that process, even though that is what they were spouting as wanting. Edited October 26, 2015 by tnt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George M. Bluth Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 Based on the poll on the Herald's website, we're going to end up with Fighting Hawkes and a logo like this: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 Everyone has taken a side and now it's not about getting the best name for UND, it's about their side winning. That's what's not good for the University. Again I say bologna.Abe Vigoda guy (siouxphan27) was staunchly "anti- Roughriders" and he's saying "top two" when we know it takes his favorite out of play. There are others. What's good for the University is to not appear to be influencing the vote by arbitrarily and capriciously changing the rules on the fly. What's good for the University is to make statements and live to them. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scpa0305 Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 Shocked fighting hawks has the lead, what a terrible choice. In full transparency, I would MUCH rather have RR than Fighting Hawks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan512 Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 Just start spreading this logo.I voted for Nodaks, and I plan on voting that way again. Though if if Roughriders were to win, I could definitely get on board with a logo like this. Unfortunately, Fighting Hawks is looking like it will lead the way, which is pretty unfortunate give how boring and incredibly bland it is. Sad to see us go from such a great name and great logo to just another boring name. At least Nodaks and Roughriders were unique. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagies Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 At this point receiving 50+% of the vote is paramount at some stage to make this process looks even remotely legit.Completely agree. Have to do 2nd run-off if no one gets 50%+ in this next one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxbow6 Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 Completely agree. Have to do 2nd run-off if no one gets 50%+ in this next one. Just sent emails to Kelly and Johnson stating such. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.