Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 hours ago, 90siouxfan said:

Been my opinion for a long time that removing the Fighting Sioux name was a Chippewa jab at a long time foe...

Agree +++++++  have always felt that way!

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
1 hour ago, Siouxperfan7 said:

I have been saying this for years, especially when Bison fans made fun of our predicament. They would just laugh at me and insist it wasn't the same thing. I for one would enjoy getting to laugh at them for a change.

  • 7 months later...
  • 6 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 5 months later...
Posted
2 minutes ago, Big Green said:

Didn't know you could apply for a trademark for something that is already trademarked.  

You can't, not for the same 'usage' at least. 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Big Green said:

Didn't know you could apply for a trademark for something that is already trademarked.  Does seem like a good opportunity to generate a bunch of NIL money.  With all the L's the NCAA has been taking lately I don't think they would be a problem.  

UND made big mistake and let it lapse...this on them.

Posted

Part of the nickname settlement required them to continue to hold the trademarks, thus the previously mentioned Dacotah Legacy Collection.

While I like the spirit of the idea to raise NIL funds, I don't think this is the way. Is the argument that they aren't using them enough? Not sure that qualifies to take someone's trademark, especially if they are still actively using them.

Posted
27 minutes ago, jdub27 said:

Part of the nickname settlement required them to continue to hold the trademarks, thus the previously mentioned Dacotah Legacy Collection.

While I like the spirit of the idea to raise NIL funds, I don't think this is the way. Is the argument that they aren't using them enough? Not sure that qualifies to take someone's trademark, especially if they are still actively using them.

I think this is the perfect way.  I don't think the majority of people want to contribute to NIL if they are not getting something back.  Sioux name is not going anywhere and the university has failed to capitalize on it.  They have the Legacy collection and don't hardly have anything in it.  A lot of people will not buy fighting hawk merchandise no matter what. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Big Green said:

I think this is the perfect way.  I don't think the majority of people want to contribute to NIL if they are not getting something back.  Sioux name is not going anywhere and the university has failed to capitalize on it.  They have the Legacy collection and don't hardly have anything in it.  A lot of people will not buy fighting hawk merchandise no matter what. 

Well, the first issue is UND is violation with their settlement agreement with the NCAA if they don't retain the trademark of the retired nickname and logo.

Second issue would be setting back whatever strides in rebranding (regardless of how small or large) and giving in to a very vocal minority group who mostly support the hockey team. Not saying there isn't a way to come up with a solution, but the Sioux Shop still sells Fighting Sioux merchandise. While the selection is intentionally limited, would be curious on what the sales for the Dacotah Legacy Collection actually is.

As to your point about people wanting to get something back, sure that is definitely fair and I agree with it. However, if you want talented rosters, the current set up requires funds to help pay for them. At this point, the return (is hopefully) winning games.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...