Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, MafiaMan said:

SiouxSports.com on the .02% that aren’t stopped:  “”Thome would like that one back!”

The goal he did give up last night I stop 9 times out of 10. :lol:

  • Upvote 1
Posted
Just now, Wilbur said:

The goal he did give up last night I stop 9 times out of 10. :lol:

Yeah, that was soft and unfortunate.  I bet he stops that 95 times out of 100.

Posted
29 minutes ago, burd said:

Interesting.  Are you close to the players, so you feel comfortable saying how they feel about it.  

I frankly like it that Thome takes ownership of what goes on in his crease area.   It's his domain, and I'm guessing his teammates are good with how he manages it, including those he held back.  Just a guess.   I don't know any of those guys. 

Nope not close with any of the players just going off how I’d feel and a couple reactions. Saw a couple guys last night trying to pull his arm off and then giving him a look like come on man last night.

Posted
6 minutes ago, SiouxScore said:

Nope not close with any of the players just going off how I’d feel and a couple reactions. Saw a couple guys last night trying to pull his arm off and then giving him a look like come on man last night.

Could be.  If the opposing team has been abusing the goalie (outside the usual shyt that goes on after a freeze), then he needs to be protected.  But if that is not happening, I like it that he is trying to keep his boys out of the box.   It's usually just face-wash theatrics anyway, not real enforcement.  If he prevents a cross check minor in a close game, good for him. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Big Lubowski said:

Well done! Nice to get another perspective, in addition to Schloss and everyone on here. Love reading everything Sioux.

Anything for the Dude, man. 

Posted

Is there a replay link to the play Brink got hurt on, only seen the blips on CBS and I didn't think it was a penalty worthy event.  As much as poking Goon for "letting" his relative chose the dark side, sure don't want to see any injury.  Hope it all works out for Bobby and he gets back to 100%, fun kid to watch.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Godsmack said:

So I am reading my folks’ Herald this morning and there’s no story on last night’s game. Only a story on Friday’s game. That’s lame! 

Saturday’s game story will be in Tuesday herald, wonder why people quit getting the rag.

  • Upvote 3
Posted
21 minutes ago, SIOUXELEVENS said:

Saturday’s game story will be in Tuesday herald, wonder why people quit getting the rag.

This.....^^^

Printed in Fargo at 5 pm with no Monday Herald paper. 

Seriously considering dropping our Forum subscription. 

Posted
46 minutes ago, 90siouxfan said:

Is there a replay link to the play Brink got hurt on, only seen the blips on CBS and I didn't think it was a penalty worthy event.  As much as poking Goon for "letting" his relative chose the dark side, sure don't want to see any injury.  Hope it all works out for Bobby and he gets back to 100%, fun kid to watch.

https://twitter.com/RecoveringOps/status/1228559618592399360

Posted
1 hour ago, 90siouxfan said:

Is there a replay link to the play Brink got hurt on, only seen the blips on CBS and I didn't think it was a penalty worthy event.  As much as poking Goon for "letting" his relative chose the dark side, sure don't want to see any injury.  Hope it all works out for Bobby and he gets back to 100%, fun kid to watch.

If anything it's a tripping penalty.  The people out there that want a major penalty are stupid.  Brink bobbled the puck which is one of the triggers for our guys to attack on the PK.  It's not like Smith just dove at his legs to be stupid.  

Hopefully Brink is back soon. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Wilbur said:

If anything it's a tripping penalty.  The people out there that want a major penalty are stupid.  Brink bobbled the puck which is one of the triggers for our guys to attack on the PK.  It's not like Smith just dove at his legs to be stupid.  

Hopefully Brink is back soon. 

It’s actually clipping and should have been a major. But since they didn’t call the major for the elbow to the head move on. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, SIOUXELEVENS said:

Not saying it wasn’t a penalty , it’s just not a major.

Since the rule book says attempting to clip and missing is a minor and making contact below the knees is a major I guess your wrong. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Vegas_Sioux said:

Since the rule book says attempting to clip and missing is a minor and making contact below the knees is a major I guess your wrong. 

So if you never touch a player you can get a penalty?

You can't have a clipping penalty unless it's at or below the knees so by your definition every clip penalty would be a major.

Posted

The Rule Book followed by every decent Sioux fan I know clearly states that no UND player may be called for an infraction unless UND is up by at least 3.  Even then, it must be clearly identified as an "equalizer" penalty. 

You disagree?  Fight me.

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...