Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not getting in really sucks. We were always a bubble team but really think we deserved to get in over EIU or WIU. But it is what is and hopefully it puts a huge chip on the players returning next season! Leave no doubt!

  • Upvote 3
Posted

my opinion is 7 wins, and we were kept out.  8 wins and we wouldn't be having this conversation on why we were left out.  I'm not close to the team so can't comment on the intangibles regarding ndsu.  But the collapses in Weber and ISU still happened despite whatever growth happened at ndsu.  Bartels didn't play D in those games.....would've been nice if Arnell could have.   

 

If we beat Idaho State or manage clock better at Weber State we are high fiving playoffs right now.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

This non selection will sting for a long while.   

It should be a wakeup call to leadership in the Big Sky; somewhere in all this were political failings.   

No. We need to win more game period.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Posted (edited)

Which is better: win over PSU or SDSU? 

Answer: Which one is a top 8 seed? 

disagree, I think SDSU is the better team. I think PSU is a good team, but losses to UND and more importantly northern Colorado two non playoff teams show that they won't make a long run in the playoffs in my mind. I don't think SDSU would lose to either of those teams. I believe a team is only as good as its losses. Yes that includes NDSU.

ALL of SDSU's losses are to playoff teams.

Edited by Bison06
  • Downvote 2
Posted

Portland St had the right to be upset as well. If their name is EWU with the exact same resume, they're probably a top 3 seed. 2 wins over fbs, one against a very good team and one absolutely dominating. Their losses came against UND, a team with a similar resume to Montana, and weber st, a better team on paper than south Dakota.....

Posted

disagree, I think SDSU is the better team. I think PSU is a good team, but losses to UND and more importantly northern Colorado two non playoff teams show that they won't make a long run in the playoffs in my mind. I don't think SDSU would lose to either of those teams. I believe a team is only as good as its losses. Yes that includes NDSU.

What do ndsu's losses to Montana and south Dakota show, as far as playoff potential? 

Posted

I'm new to fcs playoff selection. Can someone please tell me why they don't use some sort of computer model, or at least have defined standards? To me, the way it's done seems like amateur hour.

Posted (edited)

disagree, I think SDSU is the better team. I think PSU is a good team, but losses to UND and more importantly northern Colorado two non playoff teams show that they won't make a long run in the playoffs in my mind. I don't think SDSU would lose to either of those teams. I believe a team is only as good as its losses. Yes that includes NDSU.

So, you are into moral victories...  I look at wins - PSU has the most impressive win in FCS.  They beat a FBS 8-3 Washington State.

whoooo - I missed your comment about SDSU vs UND and SDSU would win.  The way UND is playing right now - UND vs SDSU is no gimme for SDSU.

Edited by FSSD
had to add to my rant
Posted

What do ndsu's losses to Montana and south Dakota show, as far as playoff potential? 

that's what I just said, includes NDSU. Wouldn't be surprised if they don't make a deep run this year. 

Posted

ALL of SDSU's losses are to playoff teams.

So they're well coached enough to not have let downs against bad teams, but not talented enough to beat good teams. Sounds like they're way better than a seeded PSU that beat 2 fbs teams who are both better than any win sdsu has. 

Posted

i am talking about pass coverage scheme when teams decide they want to air it out. Go nickle or dime package and mix man with zone.

we need another element to the d package when teams go pass happy, yes, but mostly we need to work on positioning and ball skills.  A lot of times we were really close, just need to win more 1 on 1 battles.  

Posted (edited)

I don't buy the theory of missing out on playoffs will give us great motivation.  It is motivation but the best motivation going into next year would have been to make the damn playoffs and build on it.

Edited by Siouxperman8
Posted

We didn't have the personel to do that this year. Maybe at the end when the CBs seemed to get their !@#$ together. Next year I predict our secondary will be a strength. Book it.

I think that's right, the staff felt better with our outside backers on the field compared to bringing in another safety or corner.

Posted

No. We need to win more game period.

THIS!!

One negative of the boards is the excuses people come up with as though the whole world is against UND. I can't even go to a hockey game night thread without reading about how the refs are out to get us.

Maybe we do "deserve" it more than a team or two, but we had the games in our hand and we blew them.

This should be the BEST thing to happen to this team. Their should be a chip (as another poster noted) that causes them to use this pain for the next several months in the weight room or wherever they develop skills. This should show recruits they can become part of a team on the upswing that will be in the race next year. This can be a good thing.

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...