Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

I believe that local newspapers probably had a large influence. In my case, the McKenzie County Farmer's Editor was on board with a "yes" vote and Omdahl also had a article printed. Both of these explained the measures rationally and probably help push the result toward yes.

Posted
  On 6/13/2012 at 2:45 AM, Flatland said:

I believe that local newspapers probably had a large influence. In my case, the McKenzie County Farmer's Editor was on board with a "yes" vote and Omdahl also had a article printed. Both of these explained the measures rationally and probably help push the result toward yes.

Contrary to what some on the coasts may think, NoDaks generally show a great degree of common sense when they go to the polls and don't get wrapped up in the hysterics or "smoke and mirrors" arguments.

Posted

I think a lot of us were confident that the YES vote would take measure 4. But, did anyone imagine the numbers being like this? Congrats to all who got the word out there and told the facts about the issue.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Now its really becoming a landslide

Yes 66.09%

No 33.91%

208/426

No word from Sioux County

Half of Cass County is in and its 72-28 percent for Yes.

Posted
  On 6/13/2012 at 3:04 AM, darell1976 said:

256/426

Yes 62,817 or 67.51%

No 30,230 or 32.49%

Once I saw Golden Valley/Beach vote YES, I knew this would be a landslide.

Posted
  On 6/13/2012 at 3:02 AM, gfhockey said:

Rob Port is already thinking of conspiracy theories like how the voters were confused about the yes or no meaning

Nah, they were obviously brainwashed and bribed by Tim O'Keefe and other alums. (It was money well spent. :hypocrite: )

Posted
  On 6/13/2012 at 3:04 AM, darell1976 said:

256/426

Yes 62,817 or 67.51%

No 30,230 or 32.49%

This is turning into a complete landslide. I was expecting a 55-45 gap or less. Definitely a bittersweet time, but I've come to accept it.

Posted
  On 6/13/2012 at 3:02 AM, gfhockey said:

Rob Port is already thinking of conspiracy theories like how the voters were confused about the yes or no meaning

At least he can correctly claim that the Forum poll really was way off, after all. ;)

Posted
  On 6/13/2012 at 3:01 AM, darell1976 said:

Sioux County

Yes 184

No 159

Now Complete

Thats says it all!!

To all those who were banking on using Sioux County to claim to the NCAA that Standing Rock really really approves after all ... all I can say is "oops."

Posted
  On 6/13/2012 at 3:09 AM, The Sicatoka said:

To all those who were banking on using Sioux County to claim to the NCAA that Standing Rock really really approves after all ... all I can say is "oops."

Really guys... You know as well as anyone that the vote is not a vote on whether or not people support the name. And that it is a vote to save the university athletics.

Posted
  On 6/13/2012 at 3:13 AM, andtheHomeoftheSIOUX!! said:

Really guys... You know as well as anyone that the vote is not a vote on whether or not people support the name. And that it is a vote to save the university athletics.

Yes, WE know that, but that's not what the "nickname at all costers" were saying. By the way, where are they?

Posted
  On 6/13/2012 at 3:15 AM, Teeder11 said:

Yes, WE know that, but that's not what the "nickname at all costers" were saying. By the way, where are they?

Trying to come up with more conspiracy theories on how "the folks in North Dakota" were "fooled" and "scared" into voting Yes and how "it ain't over yet".

  • Upvote 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...