UND1983 Posted Sunday at 12:45 AM Share Posted Sunday at 12:45 AM Both Bubba's kids played at RR, I highly doubt that is the issue. The new coaches may not have reached out enough to this point, yep. Anytime there is a change its inevitable that personalities and styles will clash for a time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shep Posted Sunday at 04:55 PM Share Posted Sunday at 04:55 PM 16 hours ago, UND1983 said: Both Bubba's kids played at RR, I highly doubt that is the issue. The new coaches may not have reached out enough to this point, yep. Anytime there is a change its inevitable that personalities and styles will clash for a time I'm thinking this was not a job for the new coaches as they had made a good connection with the kid. That connection is now at SDSU 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdub27 Posted Monday at 03:44 AM Share Posted Monday at 03:44 AM On 6/29/2024 at 10:59 AM, SIOUXFAN97 said: My RRHS source says that the coaching staff has reached out to the two new guys from winona to try to create a relationship so "things" like Walters doesn't happen again..........................crickets. My sources say different. It is what it is. Walters wanted a change of scenery. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxFan100 Posted Monday at 04:06 AM Share Posted Monday at 04:06 AM Ship has sailed 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted Monday at 12:56 PM Share Posted Monday at 12:56 PM If he was Freund's neighbor he's following Freund. Tough but it happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kab Posted Monday at 02:27 PM Share Posted Monday at 02:27 PM He may come back it happens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Monday at 02:42 PM Share Posted Monday at 02:42 PM 1 hour ago, The Sicatoka said: If he was Freund's neighbor he's following Freund. Tough but it happens. is freund gonna throw him the ball in brookings? shouldn't pawlek have been the guy he was closer to him and then when he left shoudn't it have been the winona guy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Monday at 02:43 PM Share Posted Monday at 02:43 PM 10 hours ago, jdub27 said: My sources say different. It is what it is. Walters wanted a change of scenery. he'll get a lot of scenery in five minutes in any direction in brookings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Monday at 02:44 PM Share Posted Monday at 02:44 PM 10 hours ago, jdub27 said: My sources say different. It is what it is. Walters wanted a change of scenery. tell your source to tell frichte to answer his phone then. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gfhockey Posted Monday at 03:28 PM Share Posted Monday at 03:28 PM We didn’t want him 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gfhockey Posted Monday at 03:29 PM Share Posted Monday at 03:29 PM Why wouldn’t want to develop him so he transfers to sdsu the next hesr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kab Posted Monday at 03:34 PM Share Posted Monday at 03:34 PM Does sdsu do more bus trips with their location? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Monday at 03:49 PM Share Posted Monday at 03:49 PM 14 minutes ago, Kab said: Does sdsu do more bus trips with their location? wagon trains.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted Monday at 04:09 PM Share Posted Monday at 04:09 PM 19 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: wagon trains.... Bunny hops. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FSSD Posted Monday at 04:34 PM Share Posted Monday at 04:34 PM I always thought they jumped on a train Iike a bunch of Hobos. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post nodak651 Posted Monday at 08:28 PM Popular Post Share Posted Monday at 08:28 PM I think UND has the potential to surprise a lot of people next year. Even if the O-line isn't as good, I think the play calling will be better. If we actually run the ball when we are able to, instead of deciding to kill drives by passing on first down, we may see a more consistent offense, and that would help out the Defense as well. We had the talent to beat both Sac and USD. We were up 10 on USD at half, and we stopped USD's first drive in the 3rd Quarter with an interception in our own end zone. What did we do with that, in our first drive of the 3rd quarter? See below. USD then marches down the field again, and this time, they convert for a TD. Now up 10-7 UND gets the ball with 6:50 remaining in the third and they do this: Why pass it on first down from the USD 24 while winning, late in the 3rd, on the road? This drive is the epitome of UND's season last year. Next drive, UND holds USD to a 3 and out. What does UND do? No, even though UND is moving the ball on the ground well, they don't exploit it. Instead, they screw up the next drive with an incomplete pass to Quincy Vaugn on 2nd down, after a 6 yard rush on 1st down. In the 4th Quarter, we handed the ball off to our running backs a total of 1 time. This is the yardage we gained for every running play by a RB in the 2nd half: 3, 4, 19, 4, 6, 3, 7. The shortest rush was 3 yards. With that consistency, we still managed to give up a 10 point first half lead. Scored nothing in the 2nd half. Maybe I'm wrong - I never played FB and I don't truly know the game like others here, but I've gotta think that a change at OC may more than make up for the guys we lost on the O-Line this year. Thoughts? 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forksandspoons Posted Monday at 08:47 PM Share Posted Monday at 08:47 PM 19 minutes ago, nodak651 said: I think UND has the potential to surprise a lot of people next year. Even if the O-line isn't as good, I think the play calling will be better. If we actually run the ball when we are able to, instead of deciding to kill drives by passing on first down, we may see a more consistent offense, and that would help out the Defense as well. We had the talent to beat both Sac and USD. We were up 10 on USD at half, and we stopped USD's third drive in the 3rd Quarter with an interception in our own end zone. What did we do with that, in our first drive of the 3rd quarter? See below. USD then marches down the field again, and this time, they convert for a TD. Now up 10-7 UND gets the ball with 6:50 remaining in the third and they do this: Why pass it on first down from the USD 24 while winning, late in the 3rd, on the road? This drive is the epitome of UND's season last year. Next drive, UND holds USD to a 3 and out. What does UND do? No, even though UND is moving the ball on the ground well, they don't exploit it. Instead, they screw up the next drive with an incomplete pass to Quincy Vaugn on 2nd down, after a 6 yard rush on 1st down. In the 4th Quarter, we handed the ball off to our running backs a total of 1 time. This is the yardage we gained for every running play by a RB in the 2nd half: 3, 4, 19, 4, 6, 3, 7. The shortest rush was 3 yards. With that consistency, we still managed to give up a 10 point first half lead. Scored nothing in the 2nd half. Maybe I'm wrong - I never played FB and I don't truly know the game like others here, but I've gotta think that a change at OC may more than make up for the guys we lost on the O-Line this year. Thoughts? Great breakdown! This was the most frustrating game of the year to watch other than Sac 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Monday at 08:59 PM Share Posted Monday at 08:59 PM 30 minutes ago, nodak651 said: I think UND has the potential to surprise a lot of people next year. Even if the O-line isn't as good, I think the play calling will be better. If we actually run the ball when we are able to, instead of deciding to kill drives by passing on first down, we may see a more consistent offense, and that would help out the Defense as well. We had the talent to beat both Sac and USD. We were up 10 on USD at half, and we stopped USD's third drive in the 3rd Quarter with an interception in our own end zone. What did we do with that, in our first drive of the 3rd quarter? See below. USD then marches down the field again, and this time, they convert for a TD. Now up 10-7 UND gets the ball with 6:50 remaining in the third and they do this: Why pass it on first down from the USD 24 while winning, late in the 3rd, on the road? This drive is the epitome of UND's season last year. Next drive, UND holds USD to a 3 and out. What does UND do? No, even though UND is moving the ball on the ground well, they don't exploit it. Instead, they screw up the next drive with an incomplete pass to Quincy Vaugn on 2nd down, after a 6 yard rush on 1st down. In the 4th Quarter, we handed the ball off to our running backs a total of 1 time. This is the yardage we gained for every running play by a RB in the 2nd half: 3, 4, 19, 4, 6, 3, 7. The shortest rush was 3 yards. With that consistency, we still managed to give up a 10 point first half lead. Scored nothing in the 2nd half. Maybe I'm wrong - I never played FB and I don't truly know the game like others here, but I've gotta think that a change at OC may more than make up for the guys we lost on the O-Line this year. Thoughts? Thoughts? Rudy was lovin' it in Minot! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxHawkGuy Posted yesterday at 12:09 AM Share Posted yesterday at 12:09 AM 3 hours ago, nodak651 said: I think UND has the potential to surprise a lot of people next year. 6-0 at home last year. 7 home games this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.