Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

FCS playoffs week 1: UND @ Weber State


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Sioux94 said:

I thought that afterwards too...maybe use Smith in that scenario.  That said, what is supposed to sell it is that Hoos is a short yard type of back.  Also Hoos has has decent hands from what I've seen.  Hoos can't change his route in the middle of the play though, that would have really F'd everything up.  

Remember how Weber had their slow TE WIDE open on 4th and short and took it to the end zone?  That is how that play could have gone.....but credit Weber for great defense and their defender being all over Hoos forcing an absolute perfect throw.  

se la just did the same play on fourth down and hit a guy wide open down the middle of the field..easy pitch and catch....next play td

 

Posted

I want to thank you for the season.  We only can do what we can, and a lot of hard work went into the season.  ND fan and will always want the Sioux to succeed.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Sioux94 said:

So if your defense is complete horse sh*t......not allowing you to be in a position to win against a top team....that should be the offensive coordinators fault?  That said, I'm ok keeping an open mind and taking a broader look when it comes to the next HC.  

We had the 4th best Avg points per game in the MVFC this year...playing the 2nd best SOS. 

numbers sometimes lie...gifted a bogus td and scoring against a prevent d is easy to score agaist..where was the offense in first half....

but name danny's signature win as OC?

Posted
2 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

se la just did the same play on fourth down and hit a guy wide open down the middle of the field..easy pitch and catch....next play td

 

I've called for it a couple times this year........short yardage with Q in....fake the run and dump it off to a TE over the middle.  We sorta did that....but to a RB, to me better option is to do a TE as there are more eyes on the RB in that situation.  Weber's short yardage that went for a TD was to the TE. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
Just now, SIOUXFAN97 said:

numbers sometimes lie...gifted a bogus td and scoring against a prevent d is easy to score agaist..where was the offense in first half....

but name danny's signature win as OC?

This is a weird argument? Fine if you don’t want Danny but signature win as an OC? He controls one side of the ball, which happens to be the side that’s been the most successful the last few years. If you prefer an outside candidate, that’s fine though. I’m team Danny. Think if it’s his program, a lot would change. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
Just now, Sioux94 said:

I've called for it a couple times this year........short yardage with Q in....fake the run and dump it off to a TE over the middle.  We sorta did that....but to a RB, to me better option is to do a TE as there are more eyes on the RB in that situation.  Weber's short yardage that went for a TD was to the TE. 

agreed..just disagree about the route...i think se la went to a wr running down the seam..easy throw for their qb

Posted
31 minutes ago, nodakvindy said:

Well Bohl had spent 1 year there but it had been 20 years prior so he was definitely bringing a fresh approach. Also once on a championship roll it certainly makes more sense to stick with things. I don't see the situations as the same. 

I think the answer is Bob Babich and he was the least successful of all of them. My main point is almost all coaching hires are connected to the school or AD, not just at UND.

Posted
5 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

To be fair, the writing was sort of on the wall that he would be successful. NDSU just has higher expectations for football than UND. Bohl had back-to-back 10-1 seasons in ‘06 and ‘07.
 

Bubba hasn’t produced anything close to resembling that degree of success. closest thing would be a 9-3 season in 2016, which included a blown 24-7 playoff game lead, and then a follow up 3-8 season in 2017. 

He still is let go in 2010 if they don’t sneak into the playoffs.  Honestly their success that season was due to their offseason work and player development, which should be the starting discussion tomorrow regardless of any coaching or player changes.  

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Tangolou said:

I think the answer is Bob Babich and he was the least successful of all of them. My main point is almost all coaching hires are connected to the school or AD, not just at UND.

Babich was 46-22 and fired after one bad season (before that season he was 44-14).  Bubba on the other hand was extended after going 47-40 and 5-6 in his latest season while giving us perhaps the worst game coaching we have ever seen during that season - even though his contract was not up.  That's why each team is where they are right now.  

 

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Sioux94 said:

I've called for it a couple times this year........short yardage with Q in....fake the run and dump it off to a TE over the middle.  We sorta did that....but to a RB, to me better option is to do a TE as there are more eyes on the RB in that situation.  Weber's short yardage that went for a TD was to the TE. 

Right, dump it to 5'10" RB or 6'5" TE that rumor has it a few throw down dunks all day long in hoop games.  

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Irish said:

Babich was 46-22 and fired after one bad season (before that season he was 44-14).  Bubba on the other hand was extended after going 47-40 and 5-6 in his latest season while giving us perhaps the worst game coaching we have ever seen during that season - even though his contract was not up.  That's why each team is where they are right now.  

 

I don't disagree with any of this.

Posted
40 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

se la gonna beat idaho

we should've beat weber

montana will hopefully lose to semo

f'n big sky sucks

The argument that the big sky sucks or just that Idaho and Montana and even us were just in the bottom quarter of the playoff pool is a little different. 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said:

Can anyone recall at any level of FB a team that gave up 300+ yards on the ground and still won??

Don’t follow FB statistics as a general rule, but that aside I realize the overwhelming answer is no. I’d like to see one of the XDSU’s defensive assistants as DC in Grand Forks. Don’t follow their programs so I don’t know names, but those two were the top defenses we played. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Dustin said:

Don’t follow FB statistics as a general rule, but that aside I realize the overwhelming answer is no. I’d like to see one of the XDSU’s defensive assistants as DC in Grand Forks. Don’t follow their programs so I don’t know names, but those two were the top defenses we played. 

Just won’t happen. Bubba is too stubborn and loyal to the 3-4. Goes back to Roger Thomas and Dale Lennon. It’s all Bubba knows. Bubba is in the twilight years of his career; he won’t learn and implement anything else.
 

Bottomline, coaches and schemes will be staying the same. Is it the best strategy? Of course not, it’s lazy; but the 7-5 record and playoff berth will give them and Chaves the justification to do it. Keeping everything the same is also the cheapest strategy, therefore it’s most likely to happen. 
 

Best hope is an extensive overhaul via the transfer portal, because currently the talent level of the roster is not good enough to win the conference, and certainly not good enough to dream about winning an FCS title. Again, despite the crap I get from clueless posters, the roster has too many DII players on it. Beyond scheme and Xs and Os, if Bubba and his staff can’t secure better players, then recruiting is also an issue for this staff.

  • Upvote 3
Posted

Who is the best defensive assistant under Holinka?  When Rudy was let go he was replaced by one of his assistants and things have improved. Maybe that’s a strategy that can be replicated. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said:

It was such an obvious pick… it was in their hands and they let it slip for some comfort food.

But I haven't seen Kalen do The Griddy.......

Posted
11 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said:

I'm old enough to remember when UND's D didn't give up 600+ yards on the ground over a 7-8 game stretch.

I think you meant “quarter” not “game”. :(  

Posted
3 hours ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

Just won’t happen. Bubba is too stubborn and loyal to the 3-4. Goes back to Roger Thomas and Dale Lennon. It’s all Bubba knows. Bubba is in the twilight years of his career; he won’t learn and implement anything else.
 

Bottomline, coaches and schemes will be staying the same. Is it the best strategy? Of course not, it’s lazy; but the 7-5 record and playoff berth will give them and Chaves the justification to do it. Keeping everything the same is also the cheapest strategy, therefore it’s most likely to happen. 
 

Best hope is an extensive overhaul via the transfer portal, because currently the talent level of the roster is not good enough to win the conference, and certainly not good enough to dream about winning an FCS title. Again, despite the crap I get from clueless posters, the roster has too many DII players on it. Beyond scheme and Xs and Os, if Bubba and his staff can’t secure better players, then recruiting is also an issue for this staff.

Bingo.  One has to look no further than the 2023 commit list.  Very few with offers other than D2 schools, just one or two with offers from other MVFC teams.  I know offers aren't everything but it certainly has to make a difference if other FCS or even FBS teams are looking at these players.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...