Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, AJS said:

Edit: This is my concern with bringing in portal guys / 5th year guys. It really can hinder development for others. I just wish the rule of thumb was do not keep a guy for his 5th year when you have others on the roster that are more than capable of filling that position. Same with Portal guys.   

To your point, the defense this off-season could be a real conundrum. 

If we need five, we've kept 4, 24, and likely 15 (or less likely 25). You bring the five in the pipeline. 
If we need six, depending on the two left standing, you could bring in six from the pipeline or five and a portal.
If we need seven or (gasp) eight ... yeah, the portal is no longer an option, it's necessity. 

That's how I think the portal should be used: necessity. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

 

That's how I think the portal should be used: necessity. 

Or, on the rare occasion, an opportunity that is too good to pass up.  

  • Upvote 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, burd said:

Or, on the rare occasion, an opportunity that is too good to pass up.  

Key word: Rare. 

To me the portal could quickly become an addictive drug: Quick fix that makes you feel good short term but creates chronic problems. 

  • Upvote 3
Posted
Just now, The Sicatoka said:

Key word: Rare. 

To me the portal could quickly become an addictive drug: Quick fix that makes you feel good short term but creates chronic problems. 

I mean, we're talking about situations like next year where we need a goaltender as one of those rare situations, correct? 

Posted
Just now, stoneySIOUX said:

I mean, we're talking about situations like next year where we need a goaltender as one of those rare situations, correct? 

Goaltending is becoming what I fear: We keep going to the portal for a quick fix. 

How about we recruit and develop and get the goalie pipeline where it should be. I'll take another portal this year as we have no options, but I need to see the pipeline built back up. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, SiouxFanSince1990 said:

Defense will be an issue next year. It’s a guarantee.

Tell me who we retain and I'll tell you if I agree. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, burd said:

Or, on the rare occasion, an opportunity that is too good to pass up.  

Playing devil's advocate, UND has benefited from the portal. Westin Michaud, Connor Ford and Chris Jandric were very good and very necessary additions. Calder, Sidorski and Farmer have not been bad, and neither were Driscoll and DeRidder. Other schools have also done very well through the portal, and SCSU's pickup of Anhorn comes to mind. I don't think the portal is necessarily a bad thing, even though I don't like what has happened to Brent Johnson and some others. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

Goaltending is becoming what I fear: We keep going to the portal for a quick fix. 

How about we recruit and develop and get the goalie pipeline where it should be. I'll take another portal this year as we have no options, but I need to see the pipeline built back up. 

Yeah, I wasn't implying that we need to stop recruiting and developing the position. Definitely agree with you there. I'm speaking about next season.

7 minutes ago, SiouxFanSince1990 said:

Defense will be an issue next year. It’s a guarantee.

To start, it'll be tough. But, we've got a couple really nice pieces coming in and if they grow up quick, it could become a strength. Anyway, I think we're on the wrong thread for this :)

Posted

With presumably all the new faces it will to start with, but I hope the level of competition between the youngsters for playing time helps accelerate their development. I hope the coaches push them early so we don't have to see them struggle past Christmas.

Posted
3 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said:

Yeah, I wasn't implying that we need to stop recruiting and developing the position. Definitely agree with you there. I'm speaking about next season.

To start, it'll be tough. But, we've got a couple really nice pieces coming in and if they grow up quick, it could become a strength. Anyway, I think we're on the wrong thread for this :)

Beat me to it Stoney........

Posted
1 hour ago, AJS said:

Look at the Sophomore class as a whole. I've never seen anything remotely like it. It was a class I wasn't super high on coming in, but I thought they were pretty solid last year. By the end of the year completely outperformed my expectations. There's not a single one that took that next step, I would argue there's not one that is even performing at the level they were at last year. Pretty crazy that every single one is performing worse than last year. 

 

Edit: This is my concern with bringing in portal guys / 5th year guys. It really can hinder development for others. I just wish the rule of thumb was do not keep a guy for his 5th year when you have others on the roster that are more than capable of filling that position. Same with Portal guys.   

Agreed, good post. All these guys are still developing However whiffing on an entire class hurts bad. My curiosity is, to your point, how they did fairly well last year and tanked this year. None are on pp…most are in and out of the lineup other than schmaltz. Tough to develop when the leash is that short. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said:

He will command a lot as a free agent. I think people greatly underrate how good Frisch is. He's not gonna jump right into the NHL, but he's gonna have a lot of offers after this season. He's a very good skater, fantastic defensively, great vision and hockey sense, almost always in the right spot and has some good offensive skill. 

I think and REALLY hope he stays. If he does, he wears the C and is the team's most important overall player, IMO.

I do think he could really help this team next year while also continuing to develop individually in a much easier league than the A.  One area I slightly differ from you is his vision/O game. This is an area he can continue to get better at. Maybe quarterback a pp unit. I would say the same thing about kleven. There are definitely areas of his game that need work. Specially his O game if he’s going to try and play pro for the long haul. The NHL and AHL are not forgiving leagues. You want to be as polished as possible before going there because you may only get one shot…especially if you’re an undrafted player.

Posted

https://www.grandforksherald.com/sports/und-hockey/chris-jandric-is-among-the-countrys-top-scoring-defensemen

Quote

"With this transfer portal, you never know what you're going to get," Berry said. "At the end of the day, you're hoping that you get a very good player and an outstanding person that can add to your culture with outstanding character. He's done it. He's checked every box. We were fortunate enough to have him for two years. I wish he would have been here all four years of his career. I know he says that all the time as well."

NCAA's top defenseman scorers

1. Lane Hutson, Boston University, 44 points
2. Luke Hughes, Michigan, 42 points
3t. Mike Benning, Denver, 34 points
3t. Jake Livingstone, MSU-Mankato, 34 points
5. Chris Jandric, North Dakota, 33 points

Most points by UND defenseman since 2001-02

1. Andy Schneider, 2002-03, 41 points
2. Chay Genoway, 2010-11, 37 points
3t. Christian Wolanin, 2017-18, 35 points
3t. Brad Miller, 2008-09, 35 points
5. Chris Jandric, 2022-23, 33 points*
6t. Chay Genoway, 2008-09, 32 points
6t. Robbie Bina, 2006-07, 32 points

Posted
9 hours ago, AJS said:

Look at the Sophomore class as a whole. I've never seen anything remotely like it. It was a class I wasn't super high on coming in, but I thought they were pretty solid last year. By the end of the year completely outperformed my expectations. There's not a single one that took that next step, I would argue there's not one that is even performing at the level they were at last year. Pretty crazy that every single one is performing worse than last year. 

 

Edit: This is my concern with bringing in portal guys / 5th year guys. It really can hinder development for others. I just wish the rule of thumb was do not keep a guy for his 5th year when you have others on the roster that are more than capable of filling that position. Same with Portal guys.   

Our program problems in a nutshell - you would think our "culture" would include steady improvement.  If we get the reputation of not being able to develop players we'd better strap in for a bumpy ride.

Posted
8 hours ago, The Sicatoka said:

Goaltending is becoming what I fear: We keep going to the portal for a quick fix. 

How about we recruit and develop and get the goalie pipeline where it should be. I'll take another portal this year as we have no options, but I need to see the pipeline built back up. 

What happened to our goalie pipeline? Always had solid goalies coming in. Last few years have not been the case

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Green Banner said:

What happened to our goalie pipeline? Always had solid goalies coming in. Last few years have not been the case

It is one of the nagging issues with this program right now. Berry and company need to fix it as soon as possible.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Green Banner said:

What happened to our goalie pipeline? Always had solid goalies coming in. Last few years have not been the case

IMHO we've got to recruit Minnesota better.  So many good high school goaltenders in the state that with a year or two of junior hockey development would be capable college goaltenders.

Karl or Zane a great example.  No reason for us to have to take a gamble on a kid from Sweden that no one has seen play live. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Wilbur said:

IMHO we've got to recruit Minnesota better.  So many good high school goaltenders in the state that with a year or two of junior hockey development would be capable college goaltenders.

Karl or Zane a great example.  No reason for us to have to take a gamble on a kid from Sweden that no one has seen play live. 

Why don't we grab a 20-21 year old goalie from the NAHL? Seems to work for Duluth and Mankato and others.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...