Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

2020 Dumpster Fire (Enter at your own risk)

jk

By jk
in Community

 Share

Recommended Posts

Oxbow6 Grand Master

Oxbow6

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

It's funny seeing all the half-baked justifications for why it's different this time, but at least you're willing to admit yours is for hyper-partisan reasons.

That's an interesting comment considering all the BS this country has been put through in the last 6 months but carry on.

  • Upvote 4
  • Replies 23.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Hayduke1

    1804

  • Oxbow6

    1786

  • BarnWinterSportsEngelstad

    1135

  • The Sicatoka

    1072

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Yote 53
Yote 53

The only people who need to be tested are health care workers, the elderly, and those with underlying health conditions.  If you are young (under 50) and healthy and are taking up a test kit, crowding

Oxbow6
Oxbow6

This country is being bright to its knees by fear....not the virus. Recovery from getting the virus is a couple weeks. Recovery of society from this hysteria will be years.

Siouxphan27
Siouxphan27

It’s sad that about half the country still believes outlets like msnbc and cnn.  You would think after they lied everyday for 3 years about Russian collusion, people would get the hint of what their t

Posted Images

TheFlop Collaborator

TheFlop

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

It's funny seeing all the half-baked justifications for why it's different this time, but at least you're willing to admit yours is for hyper-partisan reasons.

Half baked justifications?  I thought people were into the goal posts moving these days?

Sioux>Bison Grand Master

Sioux>Bison

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, nodakvindy said:

Any member with an ounce of integrity would not vote. McConnell set the precedent. Trying to fill the seat now that throws all of the "law and order" arguments out the door and would be the height of hypocrisy. 

Not exactly the same precedent. Obama was a 2nd term lame duck with a senate majority of the opposite party. Trump is at the end of his first term and his own party has the senate majority. We all know the democrats would do the same if they had the power and nothing in the way to stop it!

i have read some other precedents that I’ll post

Sioux>Bison Grand Master

Sioux>Bison

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

It's funny seeing all the half-baked justifications for why it's different this time, but at least you're willing to admit yours is for hyper-partisan reasons.

Republicans have the power and no rules against moving forward with a nominee. Sounds like a full baked justification

  • Upvote 1
Goon Veteran

Goon

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Oxbow6 said:

So your kid's principle isn't a believer in masks or the CDC? 

Or is he a Pelosi minion the kids are the virus "super spreaders"?

So far, my daughter has been attending school for 3-4 weeks in person and they haven't had any problems with children being the little spreaders. 

Hayduke1 Enthusiast

Hayduke1

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Sioux>Bison said:

We also need a full court to avoid any constitutional crisis in the case of a contested election. Dereliction of duty by not filling the court during such an important time....

Yeah.  Just like in 2016.

Effing hypocrite 

  • Upvote 1
TheFlop Collaborator

TheFlop

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

Yeah.  Just like in 2016.

Effing hypocrite 

It's ok Haydouche, rest assured the new Trump appointed replacement for RBG will continue to allow you to identify as a fool.  

  • Upvote 1
SIOUXFAN97 Grand Master

SIOUXFAN97

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

Yeah.  Just like in 2016.

Effing hypocrite 

what happened in 2016 other than a total blowout of a lady that couldn't even walk at the end when cocaine don was making trips back to swing states?

Hayduke1 Enthusiast

Hayduke1

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, TheFlop said:

It's ok Haydouche, rest assured the new Trump appointed replacement for RBG will continue to allow you to identify as a fool.  

I see.

Just like you do everyday with no hope of change of that status. 

Like is tough in the cult.

Wilbur Grand Master

Wilbur

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, JohnboyND7 said:

What are you talking about

Hey non related, but our Irish are killing it today!  

Back to the dumpster fire....

  • Upvote 1
JohnboyND7 Rising Star

JohnboyND7

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

It's funny seeing all the half-baked justifications for why it's different this time, but at least you're willing to admit yours is for hyper-partisan reasons.

it is different. 

In 2016, we had a Republican Senate with a Democrat President. --> President is operating at the mercy of the opposite party. 

In 2020, we have a GOP Senate and President. Control of the relevant government apparatuses has its perks.

These aren't half-baked justifications, its a fundamentally different situation from 2016. One doesn't need to go to law school to distinguish one from the other. Only an intellectually lazy person would suggest they are the same. 

Rule: if the Senate and Presidency are controlled by the same party, they will consider a SCOTUS pick in an election year.

For hyper-partisan reasons I would ask the Senate to confirm someone as well if only to give all the lib media a middle finger.

Before the lady's body was even cold journos were threatening and encouraging riots, destruction, etc. Don't threaten me with a good time lol. Let's get it done guys!

Amy Coney Barrett would be ideal.

JohnboyND7 Rising Star

JohnboyND7

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

More of the <insert short sighted decision here> to own the libs.

What's short sighted about a President nominating a judge and the Senate confirming a judge?

Libs are threatening violence. The only sensible thing to do is move forward and get it done when the other side is threatening violence. No need to be held captive by a noisy bunch of babies lol

  • Upvote 1
Frozen4sioux Mentor

Frozen4sioux

Posted
Posted

2016 the country faced a clear choice as the next nominator.

There WAS going to be a new president. The arrogant ingnorant left ASSumed they had the election in hand.

This year there is a strong possibility that the same guy will be president come January.

Back then a clear choice of elected government was no longer evident, now there is a current and clear MANDATE of choice for who we as a country wanted to choose our justices.

Also this argument the repubs have flipped their position is ludicrous without the equal realization the dems... in this conveluted scenario... ALSO have not flipped their tune. Both have or none have, thats all.

This is a massive difference, if thats not evident to you, again go to your parents and blame them, they failed in raising a competent human.

  • Like 1
Hayduke1 Enthusiast

Hayduke1

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Frozen4sioux said:

2016 the country faced a clear choice as the next nominator.

There WAS going to be a new president. The arrogant ingnorant left ASSumed they had the election in hand.

This year there is a strong possibility that the same guy will be president come January.

Back then a clear choice of elected government was no longer evident, now there is a current and clear MANDATE of choice for who we as a country wanted to choose our justices.

Also this argument the repubs have flipped their position is ludicrous without the equal realization the dems... in this conveluted scenario... ALSO have not flipped their tune. Both have or none have, thats all.

This is a massive difference, if thats not evident to you, again go to your parents and blame them, they failed in raising a competent human.

plain old BS.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...