Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, scpa0305 said:

Oh sure ok. Great numbers (albeit in an iffy league), captain too. I just listened to his post championship game interview…very well spoken kid. I’d be perfectly fine taking a kid like that to fill a depth role. But, if he’s thinking an Ivy that’s obviously makes sense too.

Supposedly had like a 34 on the ACT also.

Surprised he hasn't committed somewhere yet.

Posted
33 minutes ago, ChadR said:

Supposedly had like a 34 on the ACT also.

Surprised he hasn't committed somewhere yet.

The NA is not a really good league but it’s solid. The very top end teams could hang a bit in the USHL. They’re missing stars but the league is super old. WLB has offers unless his skating is really bad or something. Probably just weighing his options I would assume. There are at least 5-6 D1 committed on most NA teams and Oklahoma had 8. WBL was a top player on that team. He has offers.

Posted
11 minutes ago, dustnyou said:

Can anyone think of a player UND has taken directly from the NAHL? i cant think of any off the top of my head. A bunch have went NAHL to USHL to UND.   

Connor Gaarder I believe but he was basically an emergency pickup late in the summer when JT Miller bailed. 

Posted
57 minutes ago, dustnyou said:

Can anyone think of a player UND has taken directly from the NAHL? i cant think of any off the top of my head. A bunch have went NAHL to USHL to UND.   


Matej Tomek came from the NAHL. Obviously he didn’t work out. 
 

There has been some other non-goalies but most either didn’t play thru their senior year or they played minimal roles. I think UND is more likely to grab guys from the MJHL over the NAHL. We’ve gotten some good depth guys there. 

Posted
3 hours ago, scpa0305 said:

Oh sure ok. Great numbers (albeit in an iffy league), captain too. I just listened to his post championship game interview…very well spoken kid. I’d be perfectly fine taking a kid like that to fill a depth role. But, if he’s thinking an Ivy that obviously makes sense too.

on twitter or do you have a link? I'd like to listen to it to hear his IQ. 

  • Downvote 1
Posted
4 hours ago, The Sicatoka said:

NAHL? Off the top of my head ... Kaleb Johnson ... but goalies are different. What say you @Wilbur

Similar but different? Drake Caggiula (OJHL, Canadian Junior B). 

Right. I figured a few goalies but very few skaters.  The Juice is Junior A but tier II Canada nonetheless … 

 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, The Sicatoka said:

NAHL? Off the top of my head ... Kaleb Johnson ... but goalies are different. What say you @Wilbur

Similar but different? Drake Caggiula (OJHL, Canadian Junior B). 

Matej Tomek....Ja?

Posted

NAHL has 300 + NCAA D1 college commits this year which is 2nd only to the USHL.  Every team in the NCHC has more recruits out of the NAHL than UND for whatever reason. The NAHL has become a much deeper league the past few years in some part due to the fact that the 5th year (covid year) has kept 200-300+ players out of college hockey. Those kids that take the 5th year of eligibility are pushing down Jr players for another year that would be playing DI.  Typically the NAHL roster would be at least a year older and a little bigger in size than USHL roster but would not have the high end skill of USHL roster. The NAHL is quite a bit more physical than the USHL; especially the ‘dirty South’ division as it’s affectionally called. The South typically is the strongest division - this year no different as Oklahoma proved by going 9-0 through the playoffs. The South leads the league in attendance as well with some teams averaging 2500+.  
 

http://nahl.com/player-advancement/college/

https://lscluster.hockeytech.com/statview/mobile/nahl/#/roster/1/271?league=1

Posted
16 minutes ago, SuhakiYeahYeah said:

Well that sucks, I kinda wanted to see him on the roster.

Me too. Back in the old days we almost always had spots for the local standouts. Times are a bit different…margins are slimmer 

Posted
2 minutes ago, scpa0305 said:

Me too. Back in the old days we almost always had spots for the local standouts. Times are a bit different…margins are slimmer 

Or has the landscaped changed to the tune of, do two years at a feeder school and then we can talk portal.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Frozen4sioux said:

Or has the landscaped changed to the tune of, do two years at a feeder school and then we can talk portal.

"Alaska-Fairbanks, the AAA affiliate of North Dakota, ... "  :D 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, ChadR said:

I would say we have over recruited local guys as of late and a lot of them haven't panned out in college.

I guess my point was we used to be able to take 1-2 local kids (even if they were role players) because our recruiting was so heavy. Those “local role players” were offset a bit by blue chips. I’m not saying WLB should be on the team…very much in that bubble territory given the age/league he played in.

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...