franchise Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 10 hours ago, siouxweet said: It was interesting that when they asked Sean Ritchlin(sp) in the intermission who will win he said if MN does it will be in the first minute after that when it gets to 5-10 minutes in it will favor QU. It was almost word for word what he said before Yale beat MN in the first 10 seconds in 2013. And Barry said it definitely won't be a pretty goal to end it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark17 Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 2 hours ago, cberkas said: A lot of Gopher fans complaining about the Cooley penalty, saying it's not a penalty. I didn’t care for the call either if it’s the one I’m thinking of. Anyhow the right team lost. No hanging of #10 from DU or Mich. and BU n Goofs stay at 5. Good job Q - couldn’t have asked more from you. You made my season somewhat tolerable. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark17 Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 11 minutes ago, franchise said: And Barry said it definitely won't be a pretty goal to end it. wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark17 Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 1 hour ago, Godsmack said: I thought the coaching by Pecknold was a thing of beauty. Such a ballsy call pulling the goalie with three minutes to play. At the time he did that, I openly complained to my wife how that was the wrong decision. Goes to show why he’s the coach and I’m sitting on my living room couch. Edit: Not to mention, that set play to start the overtime (which I eventually got to see after the fact). Just a great piece of coaching in such a high pressure game with everything at stake. Hats off to coach Pecknold and of course, to his players who executed. I was thinking not again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark17 Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 1 hour ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said: If he did that in the N he'd have to answer for it. Coincidental penalties, sure, but saying Cooley did nothing wrong is hilarious. The problem was the near ref basically said both or none - which I agree with at that pt. In the game n then the back ref has arm up - the optics looked bad there 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnt Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 2 minutes ago, Clark17 said: The problem was the near ref basically said both or none - which I agree with at that pt. In the game n then the back ref has arm up - the optics looked bad there What was the call? Looked like holding to me. He wrapped his arm. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark17 Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 Just now, tnt said: What was the call? Looked like holding to me. He wrapped his arm. Think so - Cooley had a little extra 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksl_sioux4ever Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 I think it's the combination of the stick up by the head and the hand/arm that knocks the helmet almost halfway off. Lucky that wasn't reviewed and called for some kind of 5 for hitting the head. Nchc refs, we know they like 5s for head contact Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackheart Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 20 minutes ago, Clark17 said: wrong The guy’s never been right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxweet Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 22 minutes ago, Clark17 said: The problem was the near ref basically said both or none - which I agree with at that pt. In the game n then the back ref has arm up - the optics looked bad there It all evens out Gophers were the benefit of a PP earlier in the period on a call that could have gone either way as well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackheart Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 3 minutes ago, siouxweet said: It all evens out Gophers were the benefit of a PP earlier in the period on a call that could have gone either way as well. Yeah, but you won’t hear Minny fans talking about that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackheart Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 Gofer goalie was so depressed after the game he walked into oncoming traffic. Damn truck went right between his legs. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iluvdebbies Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 1 minute ago, Blackheart said: Gofer goalie was so depressed after the game he walked into oncoming traffic. Damn truck went right between his legs. Close call ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scpa0305 Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 3 hours ago, cberkas said: A lot of Gopher fans complaining about the Cooley penalty, saying it's not a penalty. It was iffy…if anything both should have went. But, there was that hooking call on Q a little while before that plus that hit earlier in the game. W was due for a PP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farce poobah Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 Perets outplayed Portillo Thursday. And Saturday? It wasn’t even Close. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackheart Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 4 minutes ago, farce poobah said: Perets outplayed Portillo Thursday. And Saturday? It wasn’t even Close. IALTO! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dustnyou Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 28 minutes ago, Blackheart said: Yeah, but you won’t hear Minny fans talking about that. Right. Or the first pp of the game they got for their guy getting checked in the arm lol. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dustin Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 I also think Q was due a PP after some questionable calls earlier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaMikeFoxtrot Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 1 hour ago, Clark17 said: The problem was the near ref basically said both or none - which I agree with at that pt. In the game n then the back ref has arm up - the optics looked bad there That makes sense. I didn't watch it live so didn't know that. At the same time, when the champagne is so close you can taste it, don't give the stripes the opportunity to ref based on the score. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel_Sioux Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 2 hours ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said: If he did that in the N he'd have to answer for it. Coincidental penalties, sure, but saying Cooley did nothing wrong is hilarious. I could see coincidental, but personally I think they got the call right. Cooley has multiple infractions they could have called versus just the hold from Quinnipiac. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin G Posted April 9, 2023 Author Share Posted April 9, 2023 1 hour ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said: That makes sense. I didn't watch it live so didn't know that. At the same time, when the champagne is so close you can taste it, don't give the stripes the opportunity to ref based on the score. This is the big takeaway. It was boneheaded by Cooley to be engaged with the QU player at all. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godsmack Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 5 minutes ago, Kevin G said: This is the big takeaway. It was boneheaded by Cooley to be engaged with the QU player at all. Yah totally! Skate away, you’re less than 5 minutes from hoisting that trophy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 1 hour ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said: That makes sense. I didn't watch it live so didn't know that. At the same time, when the champagne is so close you can taste it, don't give the stripes the opportunity to ref based on the score. Exactly. Under ten minutes left its almost don't touch anyone in the offensive end time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodakvindy Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 2 hours ago, Clark17 said: wrong To be fair from a UND perspective if Q scores it, it was going to be pretty be matter how it went in. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burd Posted April 9, 2023 Share Posted April 9, 2023 I can finally convert my Holy Cross t-shirts to shop rags and replace them with something nice. A certain leg tattoo pic might look good. Woke up this morning in a world full of possibilities. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.