Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

2020 Dumpster Fire (Enter at your own risk)


jk

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Walsh Hall said:

Put Old Fella in charge of masks.  He seems to know his stuff.

He will be in charge of catering........from Taco Bell. Plus that will keep gfNDfan busy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Walsh Hall said:

How were the deaths computed for both?  Apples at apples?  Based on how the deaths are reported for Covid the numbers are clearly overstated.   Whether it was the same for the HHF I don’t know, but it certainly was much harder on young folks.

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/health/lessons-to-be-learned-from-1957-pandemic/

For your 500% greater total, I’ll take the under.  For the unemployment numbers next week, I’ll continue to cash on the over.

I don’t know how deaths were reported then either but to say that covid deaths are being counted differently from flu deaths is another misnomer, yet this misinformation continues to be spread to push an agenda.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Redneksioux said:

I don’t know how deaths were reported then either but to say that covid deaths are being counted differently from flu deaths is another misnomer, yet this misinformation continues to be spread to push an agenda.

Dr. Birx definitely agrees with you on this matter......which is inflating the mortality rate by as much as 25%.

Now Fauci could careless as he feels anyone leaving their house prior to a vaccine is going to die anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Redneksioux said:

I don’t know how deaths were reported then either but to say that covid deaths are being counted differently from flu deaths is another misnomer, yet this misinformation continues to be spread to push an agenda.

 

Do you dispute that deaths are being counts as Covid, without a test, so long as there are any Covid symptoms, or even suspecting there were symptoms.  (Elderly person found deceased at home are counted).  That is not the case with the flu.

Of the deaths reported in ND, how many do you think we’re proximate our caused by Covid?


 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Walsh Hall said:

Do you dispute that deaths are being counts as Covid, without a test, so long as there are any Covid symptoms, or even suspecting there were symptoms.  (Elderly person found deceased at home are counted).  That is not the case with the flu.

Of the deaths reported in ND, how many do you think we’re proximate our caused by Covid?


 

No. Can you say that every covid death has been identified? Can you also provide some details where deaths are currently being counted as covid without a test?

and for the ND stats an easy place to check is is the ND DOH site, they list the deaths from covid vs deaths with covid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Redneksioux said:

Can’t argue that. Recent findings says it can stay in the air for 8 minutes after someone is speaking. 

Coronavirus droplets caused by talking remain in the air for 8-14 minutes, new study says

Man, if I am to listen to what all of the learned experts are telling me to do, I may as well just go sit in my house and prepare to die, because one way or another that virus is going to find me.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, GeauxSioux said:

Coronavirus droplets caused by talking remain in the air for 8-14 minutes, new study says

Man, if I am to listen to what all of the learned experts are telling me to do, I may as well just go sit in my house and prepare to die, because one way or another that virus is going to find me.

The irony is it already has.  Unless you locked yourself in a New Zealand bunker, you have already Likely been exposed.  For whatever reason you were not infected- thank your immune system, especially your skin.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GeauxSioux said:

Coronavirus droplets caused by talking remain in the air for 8-14 minutes, new study says

Man, if I am to listen to what all of the learned experts are telling me to do, I may as well just go sit in my house and prepare to die, because one way or another that virus is going to find me.

I'm confused all the animosity towards scientists. Just because people don't like or agree with what they say doesn't make them anymore right or wrong. They present their findings and show their work. Are models and variables continuously changing, resulting in new data? Of course, that's literally how science works. Did the original projections have a huge band of outcomes? Of course, it's novel virus that no one knew much about. But of course the media immediately reports the worst case scenario instead of actual ranges, because it gets clicks. 

Anyone who thinks Fauci had some axe to grind is not paying attention to what he's actually saying. He's repeatedly stated that he has no opinion on policy or on economic decisions, he is simply relaying his findings the exact same as he has for almost 40 years and through multiple viruses. Him stating what he believes might happen is not him pushing an agenda, it's doing his job. It's up to the elected officials to make the decisions.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, jdub27 said:

I'm confused all the animosity towards scientists. Just because people don't like or agree with what they say doesn't make them anymore right or wrong. They present their findings and show their work. Are models and variables continuously changing, resulting in new data? Of course, that's literally how science works. Did the original projections have a huge band of outcomes? Of course, it's novel virus that no one knew much about. But of course the media immediately reports the worst case scenario instead of actual ranges, because it gets clicks. 

Anyone who thinks Fauci had some axe to grind is not paying attention to what he's actually saying. He's repeatedly stated that he has no opinion on policy or on economic decisions, he is simply relaying his findings the exact same as he has for almost 40 years and through multiple viruses. Him stating what he believes might happen is not him pushing an agenda, it's doing his job. It's up to the elected officials to make the decisions.

Because we made policy and destroyed people's lives temporarily based on their "findings".  Their findings are constantly changing and they are not held accountable for anything they have found that didn't turn out to mean anything, but was used as a reason to take an action.  

If we hadn't done anything drastic then whatever, another piece of the puzzle.  But their "findings", however political they may be, have created fear porn for everyone, which led to a sheep mentality where if one group shuts down now we have to because we might look bad.  

The word LIABILITY comes to mind lately.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, jdub27 said:

I'm confused all the animosity towards scientists. Just because people don't like or agree with what they say doesn't make them anymore right or wrong. They present their findings and show their work. Are models and variables continuously changing, resulting in new data? Of course, that's literally how science works. Did the original projections have a huge band of outcomes? Of course, it's novel virus that no one knew much about. But of course the media immediately reports the worst case scenario instead of actual ranges, because it gets clicks. 

Anyone who thinks Fauci had some axe to grind is not paying attention to what he's actually saying. He's repeatedly stated that he has no opinion on policy or on economic decisions, he is simply relaying his findings the exact same as he has for almost 40 years and through multiple viruses. Him stating what he believes might happen is not him pushing an agenda, it's doing his job. It's up to the elected officials to make the decisions.

It is the Dunning-Kruger graph. People have a tendency to think they know more about a subject than thousands of scientists who have spent decades learning a subject matter. They equate their own personal hunches as superior to billion dollar funded government agencies like the CDC. 

Fauci has been the nations leading expert on infectious disease for six presidencies. He was awarded the medal of freedom by Bush, the highest non-military civil award achievable in the USA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, yzerman19 said:

Well 10 on the field for baseball and basketball, 12 for hockey, 22 for football...

I was thinking more of the close groups of 10 being allowed now, so I was thinking about the huddle.  
from what I understand now, 10 people huddling together in a bar is just fine, but nine kids spread out to play defense on a baseball field is an in sanely infectious situation waiting to happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dynato said:

It is the Dunning-Kruger graph. People have a tendency to think they know more about a subject than thousands of scientists who have spent decades learning a subject matter. They equate their own personal hunches as superior to billion dollar funded government agencies like the CDC. 

Fauci has been the nations leading expert on infectious disease for six presidencies. He was awarded the medal of freedom by Bush, the highest non-military civil award achievable in the USA.

It has nothing to do with that and you know it.  It has to do with us, as a country, then reacting to their ever changing "findings" by burning it down to a low we haven't seen in 75+ years.  The real ramifications of our overreaction won't be seen for a few years.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...