Oxbow6 Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 9 minutes ago, Walsh Hall said: Put Old Fella in charge of masks. He seems to know his stuff. He will be in charge of catering........from Taco Bell. Plus that will keep gfNDfan busy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redneksioux Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 20 minutes ago, Walsh Hall said: How were the deaths computed for both? Apples at apples? Based on how the deaths are reported for Covid the numbers are clearly overstated. Whether it was the same for the HHF I don’t know, but it certainly was much harder on young folks. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/health/lessons-to-be-learned-from-1957-pandemic/ For your 500% greater total, I’ll take the under. For the unemployment numbers next week, I’ll continue to cash on the over. I don’t know how deaths were reported then either but to say that covid deaths are being counted differently from flu deaths is another misnomer, yet this misinformation continues to be spread to push an agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxbow6 Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 West Fargo and Fargo to hold in-person graduations on original dates as planned. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxbow6 Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 8 minutes ago, Redneksioux said: I don’t know how deaths were reported then either but to say that covid deaths are being counted differently from flu deaths is another misnomer, yet this misinformation continues to be spread to push an agenda. Dr. Birx definitely agrees with you on this matter......which is inflating the mortality rate by as much as 25%. Now Fauci could careless as he feels anyone leaving their house prior to a vaccine is going to die anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walsh Hall Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 7 minutes ago, Redneksioux said: I don’t know how deaths were reported then either but to say that covid deaths are being counted differently from flu deaths is another misnomer, yet this misinformation continues to be spread to push an agenda. Do you dispute that deaths are being counts as Covid, without a test, so long as there are any Covid symptoms, or even suspecting there were symptoms. (Elderly person found deceased at home are counted). That is not the case with the flu. Of the deaths reported in ND, how many do you think we’re proximate our caused by Covid? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post NoiseInsideMyHead Posted May 16, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted May 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Redneksioux said: I was simply replying that information shared in the link was misleading. What’s you fascination with sharing misinformation? Would you prefer we go back to your other favorite topic of “no scientific benefit of mask use”? Which misinformation is that? That we're human, that we're mortal, that we have fully functioning immune systems that have served us well for centuries, that this is not the first and (probably) not the last virus we'll encounter, that people will die, that until this virus had a name and a press agent 99.9% of the US population would have simply gone about living completely unaware, that lay people have no business trying to digest the type and quantity of information they're being force fed on a daily basis, that indefinite lockdown orders are unconstitutional, that civil defense propaganda from the Cold War was never intended to save lives but rather placate the masses, that one-size-fits-all approaches to public health are ludicrous, that haircuts can be achieved with minimal risk. Please, point me to the "misinformation." 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walsh Hall Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Redneksioux said: Would you prefer we go back to your other favorite topic of “no scientific benefit of mask use”? https://t.co/J7oyWEdWPj Article with counterpoint regarding masks, including scientific research indicating that masks have not should benefit in regard to the flu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redneksioux Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 17 minutes ago, Walsh Hall said: Do you dispute that deaths are being counts as Covid, without a test, so long as there are any Covid symptoms, or even suspecting there were symptoms. (Elderly person found deceased at home are counted). That is not the case with the flu. Of the deaths reported in ND, how many do you think we’re proximate our caused by Covid? No. Can you say that every covid death has been identified? Can you also provide some details where deaths are currently being counted as covid without a test? and for the ND stats an easy place to check is is the ND DOH site, they list the deaths from covid vs deaths with covid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post GeauxSioux Posted May 16, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted May 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Redneksioux said: I was simply replying that information shared in the link was misleading. What’s you fascination with sharing misinformation? Would you prefer we go back to your other favorite topic of “no scientific benefit of mask use”? I prefer the 6’ apart for social distancing. A number that they pulled from their backsides. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redneksioux Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 1 minute ago, Walsh Hall said: https://t.co/J7oyWEdWPj Article with counterpoint regarding masks, including scientific research indicating that masks have not should benefit in regard to the flu. Think the blaze has an agenda? I’d trust this one a little more.... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/#!po=1.19048 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redneksioux Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 5 minutes ago, GeauxSioux said: I prefer the 6’ apart for social distancing. A number that they pulled from their backsides. Can’t argue that. Recent findings says it can stay in the air for 8 minutes after someone is speaking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bison Dan Posted May 16, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted May 16, 2020 6 minutes ago, GeauxSioux said: I prefer the 6’ apart for social distancing. A number that they pulled from their backsides. My favorite is 10 people in a group. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeauxSioux Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 14 minutes ago, Redneksioux said: Can’t argue that. Recent findings says it can stay in the air for 8 minutes after someone is speaking. Coronavirus droplets caused by talking remain in the air for 8-14 minutes, new study says Man, if I am to listen to what all of the learned experts are telling me to do, I may as well just go sit in my house and prepare to die, because one way or another that virus is going to find me. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yzerman19 Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 29 minutes ago, GeauxSioux said: Coronavirus droplets caused by talking remain in the air for 8-14 minutes, new study says Man, if I am to listen to what all of the learned experts are telling me to do, I may as well just go sit in my house and prepare to die, because one way or another that virus is going to find me. The irony is it already has. Unless you locked yourself in a New Zealand bunker, you have already Likely been exposed. For whatever reason you were not infected- thank your immune system, especially your skin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxphan27 Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 47 minutes ago, Bison Dan said: My favorite is 10 people in a group. If they could just increase that group size by 1, football season would be a definite go this fall. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yzerman19 Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 37 minutes ago, Siouxphan27 said: If they could just increase that group size by 1, football season would be a definite go this fall. Well 10 on the field for baseball and basketball, 12 for hockey, 22 for football... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yzerman19 Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 In other news as of this morning: in hardest hit NY, 99.86% of people have not died of covid. in CA 99.992% of people have not died of covid. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdub27 Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 1 hour ago, GeauxSioux said: Coronavirus droplets caused by talking remain in the air for 8-14 minutes, new study says Man, if I am to listen to what all of the learned experts are telling me to do, I may as well just go sit in my house and prepare to die, because one way or another that virus is going to find me. I'm confused all the animosity towards scientists. Just because people don't like or agree with what they say doesn't make them anymore right or wrong. They present their findings and show their work. Are models and variables continuously changing, resulting in new data? Of course, that's literally how science works. Did the original projections have a huge band of outcomes? Of course, it's novel virus that no one knew much about. But of course the media immediately reports the worst case scenario instead of actual ranges, because it gets clicks. Anyone who thinks Fauci had some axe to grind is not paying attention to what he's actually saying. He's repeatedly stated that he has no opinion on policy or on economic decisions, he is simply relaying his findings the exact same as he has for almost 40 years and through multiple viruses. Him stating what he believes might happen is not him pushing an agenda, it's doing his job. It's up to the elected officials to make the decisions. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxbow6 Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 Colorado just amended its COVID deaths from over a 1000 down to 878. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWSiouxMN Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 Read that France might have had this floating around in Mid-November, two months before their first confirmed case. They already were studying a few possible cases from December. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dynato Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 What I am curious about is the absence of congressmen in the media besides for stimulus packages. Not that I miss that haha. It has been reported they get tested twice a week. So far, only one senator and seven representatives have tested positive. Two dozen have self-quarantined. https://www.govtrack.us/covid-19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 41 minutes ago, jdub27 said: I'm confused all the animosity towards scientists. Just because people don't like or agree with what they say doesn't make them anymore right or wrong. They present their findings and show their work. Are models and variables continuously changing, resulting in new data? Of course, that's literally how science works. Did the original projections have a huge band of outcomes? Of course, it's novel virus that no one knew much about. But of course the media immediately reports the worst case scenario instead of actual ranges, because it gets clicks. Anyone who thinks Fauci had some axe to grind is not paying attention to what he's actually saying. He's repeatedly stated that he has no opinion on policy or on economic decisions, he is simply relaying his findings the exact same as he has for almost 40 years and through multiple viruses. Him stating what he believes might happen is not him pushing an agenda, it's doing his job. It's up to the elected officials to make the decisions. Because we made policy and destroyed people's lives temporarily based on their "findings". Their findings are constantly changing and they are not held accountable for anything they have found that didn't turn out to mean anything, but was used as a reason to take an action. If we hadn't done anything drastic then whatever, another piece of the puzzle. But their "findings", however political they may be, have created fear porn for everyone, which led to a sheep mentality where if one group shuts down now we have to because we might look bad. The word LIABILITY comes to mind lately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dynato Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 19 minutes ago, jdub27 said: I'm confused all the animosity towards scientists. Just because people don't like or agree with what they say doesn't make them anymore right or wrong. They present their findings and show their work. Are models and variables continuously changing, resulting in new data? Of course, that's literally how science works. Did the original projections have a huge band of outcomes? Of course, it's novel virus that no one knew much about. But of course the media immediately reports the worst case scenario instead of actual ranges, because it gets clicks. Anyone who thinks Fauci had some axe to grind is not paying attention to what he's actually saying. He's repeatedly stated that he has no opinion on policy or on economic decisions, he is simply relaying his findings the exact same as he has for almost 40 years and through multiple viruses. Him stating what he believes might happen is not him pushing an agenda, it's doing his job. It's up to the elected officials to make the decisions. It is the Dunning-Kruger graph. People have a tendency to think they know more about a subject than thousands of scientists who have spent decades learning a subject matter. They equate their own personal hunches as superior to billion dollar funded government agencies like the CDC. Fauci has been the nations leading expert on infectious disease for six presidencies. He was awarded the medal of freedom by Bush, the highest non-military civil award achievable in the USA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxphan27 Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 42 minutes ago, yzerman19 said: Well 10 on the field for baseball and basketball, 12 for hockey, 22 for football... I was thinking more of the close groups of 10 being allowed now, so I was thinking about the huddle. from what I understand now, 10 people huddling together in a bar is just fine, but nine kids spread out to play defense on a baseball field is an in sanely infectious situation waiting to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted May 16, 2020 Share Posted May 16, 2020 1 minute ago, dynato said: It is the Dunning-Kruger graph. People have a tendency to think they know more about a subject than thousands of scientists who have spent decades learning a subject matter. They equate their own personal hunches as superior to billion dollar funded government agencies like the CDC. Fauci has been the nations leading expert on infectious disease for six presidencies. He was awarded the medal of freedom by Bush, the highest non-military civil award achievable in the USA. It has nothing to do with that and you know it. It has to do with us, as a country, then reacting to their ever changing "findings" by burning it down to a low we haven't seen in 75+ years. The real ramifications of our overreaction won't be seen for a few years. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts