BigGame Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 They have so many good losses though, that's what matters.... this year. I thought our NDSU loss was bad but it was nothing compared to how NDSU dominated WIU. 2
nd1sufan Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 So the "7 DI wins" standard is now proven to be fallacy. Is this a first move by the FCS to move to a 32 team field? To do that you'd have to take some 6-5 schools. Precedent set.How about a 9-2 NC A&T or an 8-3 North Carolina Central? Or a 9-2 San Diego or Jacksonville if it all about the number of wins. Have you ever seen an 18-12 major ACC school gat an at large bid over a 26-4 mid major? WIU over UND is the same thing. WIU plays in the toughest FCS conference in the country and was 5-3 in it. They deserve to be in. You may have a case over EIU, but not WIU. They put all 5 MVFC teams on the same side of the bracket because they knew that was the only way to avoid another all MVFC final. They don't want that to happen again. 11
SiouxVolley Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 How about a 9-2 NC A&T or an 8-3 North Carolina Central? Or a 9-2 San Diego or Jacksonville if it all about the number of wins. Have you ever seen an 18-12 major ACC school gat an at large bid over a 26-4 mid major? WIU over UND is the same thing. WIU plays in the toughest FCS conference in the country and was 5-3 in it. They deserve to be in. You may have a case over EIU, but not WIU. They put all 5 MVFC teams on the same side of the bracket because they knew that was the only way to avoid another all MVFC final. They don't want that to happen again.Waah! The MVFC got so shafted that it's criminal.
Popular Post CMSioux Posted November 23, 2015 Popular Post Posted November 23, 2015 One benefit of going on a three game win streak was the absence of SU drivel. 11
ClassB Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 There are a few teams that are damn glad we are out of it.Just for the record, this is one of my least favorite statements of all time. Aj Mazzolini is parroting some UM fans saying "no one wants to see us in the post season," and I know SU fans are huge into the "no one wants to be in the fargodome" (which is true). I'd like our defense to develop the mentality that they look forward to the big dogs.
bison73 Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 Anybody else feel there are about 8 to many teams in this tournament.An additional or possible 5 games is way to much to ask.I did not favor the expansion .
Popular Post dlsiouxfan Posted November 23, 2015 Popular Post Posted November 23, 2015 How about a 9-2 NC A&T or an 8-3 North Carolina Central? Or a 9-2 San Diego or Jacksonville if it all about the number of wins. Have you ever seen an 18-12 major ACC school gat an at large bid over a 26-4 mid major? WIU over UND is the same thing. WIU plays in the toughest FCS conference in the country and was 5-3 in it. They deserve to be in. You may have a case over EIU, but not WIU. They put all 5 MVFC teams on the same side of the bracket because they knew that was the only way to avoid another all MVFC final. They don't want that to happen again.This post cannot be downgraded enough. It's obvious you're a total idiot. So WIU gets a playoff spot for playing in the toughest FCS conference even though they weren't even remotely competitive against NDSU or ISU. Only a moron NDSU fan and apparently the morons at NCAA headquarter could come up with something so idiotic. 7
UNDBIZ Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 After it's all said and done, WIU had more "good" losses than we had losses. It stinks, but we never had a chance against a team with that many losses. 3
The Sicatoka Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 How about a 9-2 NC A&T or an 8-3 North Carolina Central? Or a 9-2 San Diego or Jacksonville if it all about the number of wins. Have you ever seen an 18-12 major ACC school gat an at large bid over a 26-4 mid major? WIU over UND is the same thing. WIU plays in the toughest FCS conference in the country and was 5-3 in it. They deserve to be in. You may have a case over EIU, but not WIU. They put all 5 MVFC teams on the same side of the bracket because they knew that was the only way to avoid another all MVFC final. They don't want that to happen again.OK then, given the FCS said UND was first out, why'd EIU make the cut?
nd1sufan Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 And UND with their 61 total yards was competive against NDSU? You are dumb and dumber and dumbest if you think the Fighting Hawks were competive against NDSU. 1 4
Siouxperman8 Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 (edited) How about a 9-2 NC A&T or an 8-3 North Carolina Central? Or a 9-2 San Diego or Jacksonville if it all about the number of wins. Have you ever seen an 18-12 major ACC school gat an at large bid over a 26-4 mid major? WIU over UND is the same thing. WIU plays in the toughest FCS conference in the country and was 5-3 in it. They deserve to be in. You may have a case over EIU, but not WIU. They put all 5 MVFC teams on the same side of the bracket because they knew that was the only way to avoid another all MVFC final. They don't want that to happen again.WIU is first team to make playoffs without 7 wins since forever. Definitely a case to be made that they didn't deserve to be in. Edited November 23, 2015 by Siouxperman8 1
Siouxperman8 Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 And UND with their 61 total yards was competive against NDSU? You are dumb and dumber and dumbest if you think the Fighting Hawks were competive against NDSU. you are right. we weren't competitive against NDSU at that time of the year. Do you feel WIU was competitive when they gave up a mere 59 in their 59-7 loss to NDSU? 1
nd1sufan Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 OK then, given the FCS said UND was first out, why'd EIU make the cut? I don't know. You may have a case over EIU, but everybody seems to be talking about a 6 win WIU team getting in as a travesty when it is not. If you aren't going to take strength of schedule and stength of conference into consideration, then you take a 9 win MEAC team or a 9 win Patriot Team over any 7 or 8 win team from another conference. 1
The Sicatoka Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 you are right. we weren't competitive against NDSU at that time of the year. Do you feel WIU was competitive when they gave up a mere 59 in their 59-7 loss to NDSU? Easton Stick put the 59 onto WIU. I recall this Wentz fellow playing against UND.
UNDBIZ Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 WIU got slaughtered by 52 points with ndsu starting a freshman piece of hockey equipment at qb? Ouch.
Longtime fan Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 (edited) Edited November 23, 2015 by Longtime fan
The Sicatoka Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 I don't know. You may have a case over EIU, but everybody seems to be talking about a 6 win WIU team getting in as a travesty when it is not. If you aren't going to take strength of schedule and stength of conference into consideration, then you take a 9 win MEAC team or a 9 win Patriot Team over any 7 or 8 win team from another conference.Your answer, "I don't know," is what I have the hard spot with. Maybe I'm spoiled by the analytic approach of NCAA ice hockey (PWR); maybe I don't like an undefined process because it gives too many openings for back room graft.
Popular Post Westside Posted November 23, 2015 Popular Post Posted November 23, 2015 And UND with their 61 total yards was competive against NDSU? You are dumb and dumber and dumbest if you think the Fighting Hawks were competive against NDSU. Ok, most on here will admit UND sh*t the bed against ndsu... We took an extremely young team (I believe we started 5 SRs, 1 Jr & 16 FR or Soph's that game) into a extremely hostile environment in the 3rd game of the year & lost by 25... Night & day difference from the UND team in September to November. The "playoff-ready" Leathernecks came into the fargodome on November 7th (2 weeks ago) & got thumped by 52 points... Were down 38-0 at halftime... So, UND didn't pass your eye test, but WIU did? Got it. 7
Popular Post UNDBIZ Posted November 23, 2015 Popular Post Posted November 23, 2015 (edited) 34-9"UND is the worst team we've ever played in the D1 era"59-7"WIU is a really good team tho" Edited November 23, 2015 by UNDBIZ 5
The Sicatoka Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 WIU got slaughtered by 52 points with ndsu starting a freshman piece of hockey equipment at qb? Ouch. I've wondered if his backup is Jacque Straap. 3
nd1sufan Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 WIU got slaughtered by 52 points with ndsu starting a freshman piece of hockey equipment at qb? Ouch. That piece of hockey equipment is pretty good. Maybe Bubba should have recruited him. He has a hell of an arm and runs pretty good too.
choyt3 Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 I've wondered if his backup is Jacque Straap. Third stringer is L. Beau Padz.
ClassB Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 (edited) SFI stated on twitter today something to the effect of 'leave it the NCAA to do something so stupid that it unites both halves of North Dakota.' And that was a nice thought. And it was true.To say that UND got hosed, but then defend the interpretation of criteria that the NCAA used in picking WIU over them, is contradictory. Period. Definitely the language on here has been:UND fans: look at who we beat, versus who they beatNDSU fans: but, look at who WIU played.There is no room for debate on these facts. It definitely seems that the committee, along with the SU fans on this site, feel losses to good teams are more important than actually defeating good teams in tough situations (which fits the MVFC superiority narrative, which is why i suspect SU fans parrot that point). Though WIU's loss to NDSU is confusing to everyone. Edited November 23, 2015 by ClassB 1 1
nd1sufan Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 SFI stated on twitter today something to the effect of 'leave it the NCAA to do something so stupid that it unites both halves of North Dakota.' And that was a nice thought. And it was true.To say that UND got hosed, but then defend the interpretation of criteria that the NCAA used in picking WIU over them, is contradictory. Period. Definitely the language on here has been:UND fans: look at who we beat, versus who they beatNDSU fans: but, look at who WIU playedThere is no room for debate on these facts.WIU beat 3 playoff teams, UND beat one. Where is your case?
ClassB Posted November 23, 2015 Posted November 23, 2015 WIU beat 3 playoff teams, UND beat one. Where is your case?WIU beat 6 teams, while UND beat 7 teams. My point is that you can't at the same time say 'I thought UND should have made it,' while crying SOS of a 6-win team. Its not cohesive.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now