siouxczech29 Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 At some point in the season I expect the following: Caggiula Schmaltz Boeser Gersich Johnson Poganski Chyzyk St. Clair Wilkie Janatuinen Simonson Olson Thompson LaDue Ausmus Stecher Wolanin/Shaw Poolman Tomek Johnson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iluvdebbies Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Who has more starts this coming season, Johnson or Tomek? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sioux rube Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Who has more starts this coming season, Johnson or Tomek? Tomek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagies Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Looked like he was closer to reaching his potential in the tournament, and you can't have enough upper classmen You pretty much beat me to what I was going to say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoneySIOUX Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Who has more starts this coming season, Johnson or Tomek? I think it's Tomek and it's by more than double. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AZSIOUX Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 @SchlossmanGF: Sounds like free agent D Troy Stecher will attend development camp with the Winnipeg Jets. First if many to be reported im sure for undrafted and drafted und guys 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 @SchlossmanGF: Sounds like free agent D Troy Stecher will attend development camp with the Winnipeg Jets. First if many to be reported im sure for undrafted and drafted und guys Last year, Drake went to the Sabres camp and turned some heads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Since the "Guess the Roster" game is closed since Zane left, I'll put my final guess as to what the roster will look like here: Out (3 defensemen): Mattson, Panzarella, J Schmaltz In (3 defensemen): Chartrand, Wolanin, Shaw Out (1 goalie): MacIntyre In (1 goalie): Tomek Out (6 forwards): Pattyn, Gaarder, Parks, MacMillian, O'Donnell, Murphy In (6 forwards): Gornall, Janatuinen, Gardner, Gersich, Wilkie, Boeser That would make 10 freshmen on a 26 man roster and that matches what Brad Berry said when he said recently in an interview that "38% of the team will be freshmen" as 10/26 is 38.46%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoneySIOUX Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Since the "Guess the Roster" game is closed since Zane left, I'll put my final guess as to what the roster will look like here: Out (3 defensemen): Mattson, Panzarella, J Schmaltz In (3 defensemen): Chartrand, Wolanin, Shaw Out (1 goalie): MacIntyre In (1 goalie): Tomek Out (6 forwards): Pattyn, Gaarder, Parks, MacMillian, O'Donnell, Murphy In (6 forwards): Gornall, Janatuinen, Gardner, Gersich, Wilkie, Boeser That would make 10 freshmen on a 26 man roster and that matches what Brad Berry said when he said recently in an interview that "38% of the team will be freshmen" as 10/26 is 38.46%. TECHNICALLY, that would be 39% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Siouxman Posted June 30, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted June 30, 2015 TECHNICALLY, that would be 39% Actually, you just flunked math 101. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoneySIOUX Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Actually, you just flunked math 101. Ummm no... the .46 rounds up to .5, making 38.5% and the .5 rounds up to the 39%. http://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/math/roundingnumbers.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxman Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Ummm no... the .46 rounds up to .5, making 38.5% and the .5 rounds up to the 39%. http://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/math/roundingnumbers.php I suggest trying your little calculator again. Type in 38.46, and set the parameter to round to the nearest whole number. The answer is 38, not 39. Rounding is not a two step process. It is a one step process. You do not round from hundredths to tenths, and then tenths to the whole number. You go directly from hundredths to the whole number. 0.49 and down rounds to zero while .50 and up rounds to 1.0. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Great ... another "majority" versus "plurality" discussion. And are you going to tell Brad Berry he's wrong? Let me know how that works out for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siouxfan512 Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Ummm no... the .46 rounds up to .5, making 38.5% and the .5 rounds up to the 39%. http://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/math/roundingnumbers.php Sorry Stoney, it rounds to 38%. Plug it into the calculator link you posted. Might as well take the 9 in 39% and round it up to and even 40% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Ummm no... the .46 rounds up to .5, making 38.5% and the .5 rounds up to the 39%. http://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/math/roundingnumbers.php 10/26 is 0.384615384615384615384615384615... (with the 384615 repeating). To two digits, that's 38%. Trust Brad Berry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoneySIOUX Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 I suggest trying your little calculator again. Type in 38.46, and set the parameter to round to the nearest whole number. The answer is 38, not 39. Rounding is not a two step process. It is a one step process. You do not round from hundredths to tenths, and then tenths to the whole number. You go directly from hundredths to the whole number. 0.49 and down rounds to zero while .50 and up rounds to 1.0. Turn down the salty meter, bub. I was just messing around. Not the way I was taught how to do this... but alas... good thing I don't work with numbers. Wait... I do. Oh well... not my money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxman Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Trust Brad Berry."In Brad we trust" just took on a double meaning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxman Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Turn down the salty meter, bub. I was just messing around. Not the way I was taught how to do this... but alas... good thing I don't work with numbers. Wait... I do. Oh well... not my money.That's okay. I am an engineer (Dilbert and I are best friends). We engineers can't help ourselves. It is surprising how many on this board are engineers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoneySIOUX Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 That's okay. I am an engineer (Dilbert and I are best friends). We engineers can't help ourselves. It is surprising how many on this board are engineers. Was that sarcasm or are there legitimately a lot on here? lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cratter Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 That reminds me of a time we did rounding in elementary class. Must a been "round down" day. I was short some money that day at the convenience store for some pop and candy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigskyvikes Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Great ... another "majority" versus "plurality" discussion. And are you going to tell Brad Berry he's wrong? Let me know how that works out for you. Lmao, was thinking the same thing! Must be the off season... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxman Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Was that sarcasm or are there legitimately a lot on here? lolThere are quite a few on the board. A number of years ago we organized an "unofficial" hockey tailgating party by the old Ralph (campus police sat in a car out on the street and watched us closely). Somewhere between 1/4 and 1/2 of those that showed up were engineers. A number of people on this board I know are engineers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoneySIOUX Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 Lmao, was thinking the same thing! Must be the off season... I apologize lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigskyvikes Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 I apologize lol. Don't apologize... I'm usually, well always, the one being corrected! Lol. You made sense to me....? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxbow6 Posted June 30, 2015 Share Posted June 30, 2015 So a freshman coming with zero collegiate goals will replace Murphy on the roster..........who also had zero collegiate goals. Don't see what all the fuss is about here by some with his departure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.