Oxbow6 Posted yesterday at 08:05 PM Posted yesterday at 08:05 PM 1 hour ago, tnt said: Are we certain they chanted this? I heard some were chanting "We want Hobie"! Did they chant both things, or did people hear "Fire Berry" when it was actually "We want Hobie"? How do those 2 things even remotely sound similar that one could confuse them? Both things were chanted. 2 Quote
Wilbur Posted yesterday at 09:47 PM Author Posted yesterday at 09:47 PM 3 hours ago, tnt said: Are we certain they chanted this? I heard some were chanting "We want Hobie"! Did they chant both things, or did people hear "Fire Berry" when it was actually "We want Hobie"? I wasn't there, @Oxbow6 was the first to report this as his seats are right by the student section. @brianvf may have riled him up though. 1 Quote
brianvf Posted yesterday at 09:54 PM Posted yesterday at 09:54 PM 5 minutes ago, Wilbur said: I wasn't there, @Oxbow6 was the first to report this as his seats are right by the student section. @brianvf may have riled him up though. I kept telling him over and over about how the xG showed that UND should be winning 4-2, but yet UND was losing 5-1 on the scoreboard. He went ballistic. 4 Quote
.357 Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 4 hours ago, brianvf said: So, essentially, if Berry is still coach, you're writing off next season already as well? Just don't want to get my hopiums up for no reason. There's an old saying that you can't fix problems with the same people who created them. If the team has been having problems with consistency going on 10 months now, what gives anyone the impression that it'll be magically solved next year with the same coaching staff? It's baffling that no one on the staff can fix this core issue..it just goes on & on & on...These disappearing acts for many minutes at a time have become an entrenched pattern with the team, not just a couple of isolated incidents. Another issue I have with BB is his line-ups. Last Friday he could have dressed Croal & gotten a solid 8-10 minutes out of him that night, with him shadowing & possibly neutralizing Bump. What does he do though? He dresses Montgomery who players under a minute. It's BB's job to put the most talented team on the ice every night, & he failed to do that Friday. He also has been showing a clear preference for TJ most of the year, not developing HH who has better numbers & who possibly has a higher ceiling than TJ. Finally, not disciplining Kunz last weekend sends the message to the locker room that there will be no consequences for players who cause the team to lose. A head coach who is unable to discipline players fairly & evenly across the board when needed will eventually lose respect from his team & be viewed as a paper tiger. These examples call into question his decision-making, or his favoritism, towards certain players. 1 2 Quote
gfhockey Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago Anyone think Berry and the boyz over analyze stuff Quote
90siouxfan Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Feels like the off season already, barf. 1 1 Quote
Kab Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 46 minutes ago, gfhockey said: Anyone think Berry and the boyz over analyze stuff And the fans of Sioux sports Quote
Sweethockey Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 4 hours ago, Oxbow6 said: How do those 2 things even remotely sound similar that one could confuse them? Both things were chanted. I was in 106 and Oxbow is correct. They chanted both. 1 Quote
SiouxFan100 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago How do we know that Kunz wasn’t disciplined? Quote
Blackheart Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 3 hours ago, SiouxFan100 said: How do we know that Kunz wasn’t disciplined? well it didn't impact his ice time. Of course, Jammer's major against ASU didn't really cost him either. Quote
90siouxfan Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Is ice time the only punishment allowed? No bag skate or garbage can, no herbies? Quote
tnt Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 12 hours ago, Sweethockey said: I was in 106 and Oxbow is correct. They chanted both. The student section has quite the dilemma then, because the next coach might not be as receptive to the "Sioux Forever" chant! Quote
Redneksioux Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Hard to punish a guy whose father's business is a major sponsor at the Ralph. 1 Quote
SIOUXELEVENS Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago So now the tail wags the dog ? If that’s how Berry coaches no wonder we are in the shape we are. When Blais was recruiting Ryan potulney his father said you need to take Grant or you get neither, Blais told him I decide who plays here not parents. Quote
Redneksioux Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Not saying I know thats an issue, just wonder if it could be one of them Quote
tnt Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, SIOUXELEVENS said: So now the tail wags the dog ? If that’s how Berry coaches no wonder we are in the shape we are. When Blais was recruiting Ryan potulney his father said you need to take Grant or you get neither, Blais told him I decide who plays here not parents. So if Berry did that, and our biggest rival won two National Championships because of it, you would never let him forget that. Probably lost out on 3 great college players because of that, because UND probably would have got Danny Irmen as well. Quote
1972 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 55 minutes ago, tnt said: So if Berry did that, and our biggest rival won two National Championships because of it, you would never let him forget that. Probably lost out on 3 great college players because of that, because UND probably would have got Danny Irmen as well. was a head scratcher, for sure..Grant was a solid player, a little older than average, but solid...seems like taking him to get Ryan would be a no brainer. although, i believe, that Ryan regressed at UM way more than any one could have ever foreseen Quote
tnt Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 8 minutes ago, 1972 said: was a head scratcher, for sure..Grant was a solid player, a little older than average, but solid...seems like taking him to get Ryan would be a no brainer. although, i believe, that Ryan regressed at UM way more than any one could have ever foreseen When did Ryan commit to Minnesota, because I believe he was 16 when Grant was already with the gophers. Quote
1972 Posted 5 minutes ago Posted 5 minutes ago 4 hours ago, tnt said: When did Ryan commit to Minnesota, because I believe he was 16 when Grant was already with the gophers. that im not sure...i remember him being one of, if not thee number one 16 year old prospect at the time. not sure where Grant was at that time. He was a bit of a late bloomer, in the hockey world Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.