Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Friday....the Clowns....St. Paul. YES!


Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, Kevin G said:

SCSU (22-12-3, PWR 7):

  • PK: 76.1% (56th nationally)

UND (18-14-6, PWR 18)

  • PP: 27.2% (2nd nationally)

Looks like we need to exploit this big time.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Kevin G said:

Some stats to prep for Friday night's game:

SCSU (22-12-3, PWR 7):

  • 3.3 G/G, 2.41 GAA, +0.9 G/G margin
  • PP: 25.5% (5th nationally); PK: 76.1% (56th nationally)
  • Leading scorers (G-A-Pts): Jami Krannila (19-18-37), Zach Okabe (16-16-32), Grant Cruikshank (21-11-32), Veeti Miettinen (10-21-31)
  • +/- leaders: Krannila (+19), Josh Luedtke (+17), Brendan Bushy (+16)
  • +/- laggards: Brady Ziemer (-6), Jack Rogers (-2)
  • Most commonly-used FO guys: Cruikshank (56.7%), Mason Salquist (56.0%), Krannila (49.3%)
  • Team Sv% and GAA: .909% (19th nationally), 2.41 GAA (12th nationally)

UND (18-14-6, PWR 18)

  • 3.3 G/G, 2.82 GAA, +0.5 G/G margin
  • PP: 27.2% (2nd nationally); PK: 83.9% (13th nationally)
  • Leading scorers (G-A-Pts): Jackson Blake (16-25-41), Riese Gaber (20-17-37), Chris Jandric (4-29-33)
  • +/- leaders: Jandric (+17), Judd Caulfield (+7), Dylan James and Ben Strinden (+6)
  • +/- laggards: Cooper Moore (-12), Gavin Hain (-11), Luke Bast (-10)
  • Most commonly-used FO guys: Jake Schmaltz (55.7%), King Louie V (52.0%), Owen McLaughlin (50.1%)
  • Team Sv% and GAA: .886% (57th nationally, now tied with LIU!), 2.82 GAA (32nd nationally)

Good Stuff.   Adding just one other:

St Cloud on Regulation Ice:  6-7-1.

St Cloud on Big Ice:  16-5-2.

 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Dustin said:

Looks like we need to exploit this big time.

I neglected to include our PP% over the last 10 games (it's...not good). I suspect that the boys are working on some new PP looks this week. The PP worked until teams adjusted (especially to Gaber); now it's time to adjust to our opponents' adjustments. Thankfully UND has some excellent PP personnel. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, Kevin G said:

I neglected to include our PP% over the last 10 games (it's...not good)

May as well update save % and GAA for the last 10 games as well.  Certainly not 57th nationally.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Dustin said:

May as well update save % and GAA for the last 10 games as well.  Certainly not 57th nationally.

Yes, that's a good point. Recency cuts both ways. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, farce poobah said:

Good Stuff.   Adding just one other:

St Cloud on Regulation Ice:  6-7-1.

St Cloud on Big Ice:  16-5-2.

 

Yah, they love their home big ice advantage.  Accounting for their 20 home games on big ice and 1 away game at Minn also on big ice, where we’re the other 2 games on big ice played at?  I did see in the last half of the season (last 18 games) Clown is just 7 - 8 - 3 despite a majority of those games having been played at home so they’re not exactly on a roll right now. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, GDPritch said:

Yah, they love their home big ice advantage.  Accounting for their 20 home games on big ice and 1 away game at Minn also on big ice, where we’re the other 2 games on big ice played at?  I did see in the last half of the season (last 18 games) Clown is just 7 - 8 - 3 despite a majority of those games having been played at home so they’re not exactly on a roll right now. 

Star Tribune posted in their preview that they went 2-6-3 to close the regular season so of those 7 wins, it appears most were probably in January. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, GDPritch said:

Yah, they love their home big ice advantage.  Accounting for their 20 home games on big ice and 1 away game at Minn also on big ice, where we’re the other 2 games on big ice played at?  I did see in the last half of the season (last 18 games) Clown is just 7 - 8 - 3 despite a majority of those games having been played at home so they’re not exactly on a roll right now. 

I believe Wisconsin still plays on a glacier. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

I believe Wisconsin still plays on a glacier. 

Correct.

From UW website, Kohl Center rink size is 200' x 97.'

A little unorthodox, but not a regulation NHL sheet.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Kevin G said:

Correct.

From UW website, Kohl Center rink size is 200' x 97.'

A little unorthodox, but not a regulation NHL sheet.

Well, I be damned. Attended 4 games at Wisco over past several seasons but did not realize their ice was non-NHL regulation size. 

Posted
1 hour ago, GDPritch said:

Well, I be damned. Attended 4 games at Wisco over past several seasons but did not realize their ice was non-NHL regulation size. 

Corners at the Kohl Center are proportioned similarly to regulation-sized rinks.   But Mariucci's distinctive square corners are part of why it looks so large.

Posted
22 hours ago, farce poobah said:

Good Stuff.   Adding just one other:

St Cloud on Regulation Ice:  6-7-1.

St Cloud on Big Ice:  16-5-2.

 

I don’t remember much from statistics class but I would say this is statistically significant. St Clouds wins are heavily weighted towards playing on the big ice surface.

Posted
9 minutes ago, siouxnatty#8 said:

I don’t remember much from statistics class but I would say this is statistically significant. St Clouds wins are heavily weighted towards playing on the big ice surface.

There's a compounding factor in "ice surface" namely playing at home (no matter the ice size). 

I think it's safer to say they look like a 0.500 team away from home. Even if you add two big ice road wins at UW they're 8-7-1 away from The Herb. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Clark17 said:

3M up for overhaul after tonight.  Narrowing it up to between 88 - 92.

@Clark17, is there a reason they're not just going with a regulation 85' rink width? (It seems weird that universities can just pick an arbitrary width, like Wisco's 97'.)

Posted
3 minutes ago, Kevin G said:

@Clark17, is there a reason they're not just going with a regulation 85' rink width? (It seems weird that universities can just pick an arbitrary width, like Wisco's 97'.)

I would assume that, in both cases, they are fitting their design into existing constraints.  The Kohl Center is not just a hockey facility.  For Mariucci, it is purely a hockey facility, but they're modifying from an existing footprint.  Have to take into consideration seating, sightlines, etc.  I'm guessing the NCAA has a standard that a hockey ice sheet must conform to with certain dimensions being flexible within a range (like width) and others fixed (like goal crease, etc).

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...