Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

2020 Dumpster Fire (Enter at your own risk)


Recommended Posts

Posted
28 minutes ago, MrEdway said:

Where's Hunter? Russia? Looking for his dildo? Tick, tick, tick...

Your hero.  The soon to be late Rush Limbaugh.  Buyer of underage prostitutes in the Dominican Republic. 

Tick, tick, tick.  

https://petriesan.wordpress.com/2012/03/02/limbaugh-frequented-prostitutes-in-the-dominican-republic-in-2006/

In 2006, El Rushbo was traveling with four other men—including the producers of the hit show “24”—when he was detained over a mislabeled bottle of Viagra found in his luggage during a Customs search. I really do not care and would not mention it except for his attack on Ms. Fluke, but unless he was using the pills for high blood pressure (the original reason for their development); then one has to assume it was to help him enjoy the compnay of female, possibly of the prostitute or slut category. 

Posted

Your cult leader. 

What does that say about the cult?  No doubt they will deny this truth about their leader.  That is what cults do. 

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-white-supremacy-racehorse-theory-1064928/?fbclid=IwAR3PwIl7pL-vDozu9JARG0qhkv--sD_UpE4OV7mjqT1mJGxadId0V41CRQA

Trump Preached White Supremacy in Minnesota, America Barely Noticed

Touting “the racehorse theory” and the superiority of the genes of white Minnesotans, Trump explicitly embraced eugenics

Posted

Bank on this, cult. 

Trump probably will not win this election.  But, he might deny the results in an attempt to stay in power. 

He is lying.  Only a cultist would repeat his lie. 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/23/trump-wont-commit-to-peaceful-transfer-of-power-if-he-loses-the-election.html

The president had been asked by a reporter if he would commit to a peaceful transfer of power, “win, lose or draw.”

When the reporter noted that “people are rioting,” Trump replied: “Get rid of the ballots, and you’ll have a very – you’ll have a very peaceful – there won’t be a transfer, frankly, there’ll be a continuation.”

“The ballots are out of control,” Trump said, adding, “The Democrats know it better than anybody else.”

The Biden campaign issued the following statement in response to Trump declining to commit to a peaceful transfer of power if he were to lose the election: “The American people will decide this election. And the United States government is perfectly capable of escorting trespassers out of the White House.”

 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Okay, cultists.  What if your leader just decides to bypass the election results and have state legislatures install him for a second term?  

It is not far fetched.  In fact, his campaign is talking to Pennsylvania's legislatures about that possibility.

So, you still want to be in this cult?  You still going to support your leader no matter what?  Do you care so little about voter rights?  

https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2020/09/23/report-trump-campaign-actively-discussing-radical-measures-to-bypass-election-results/

 

A jarring new report from The Atlantic claims that the Trump campaign is discussing potential strategies to circumvent the results of the 2020 election, should Joe Biden defeat Donald Trump, by first alleging the existence of rampant fraud and then asking legislators in battleground states where the Republicans have a legislative majority to bypass the state’s popular vote and instead to choose electors loyal to the GOP and the sitting president.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Hayduke1 said:

This has been debunked by the New York Times and other real media that the cult lies about and calls fake news. 

Be better, cultist. 

I dont believe anyone debunked the wire transfers lol. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, homer said:

You and Dem leaders continually saying Trump won’t accept the election results after 2016 makes this post funny to everyone else.   They haven’t accepted 2016 yet. 

The hypocrisy from the left is through the roof 

  • Upvote 4
Posted

Redneksioux should feel safe leaving home by next summer. Fauci said there should be 50M vaccine doses by November, 100M by December  and 700M by April..........but let's face it that if that actually happens that still won't be the end game. Doomsday bedwetters across the nation like some on this site will  still not be satisfied because the versus isn't  "gone". Zero cases for this fear mongering ignorant "cult" is what they want to see. These people have and want no end game to this other than that...no cases. A viable vaccine and masks.....not enough. They want no "normal" ever again. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

US Constitution Article II, Section 1, paragraph 2:

Quote

"Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, ..."

That says the State Legislature has final say on Electors (i.e. who casts the state's votes in the Electoral College). The Legislature can say by popular vote results. They can say by their own decision and vote. They could say the Governor picks. They could say the head football coach of the largest HS in the state picks electors. It's the Legislature's call ultimately. (We're just used to the Legislature using popular vote as the mechanism.) 

 

The beauty? Those legislators face re-election after their actions. ;) 

Posted
18 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:

 

Is this the same "The Atlantic" that last week claimed Trump berated veterans who died in war? 

Yes.  

Because he did.  

But, go ahead and try to discredit a legitimate source. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

Yes.  

Because he did.  

But, go ahead and try to discredit a legitimate source. 

Four anonymous sources...former frat house brothers of Adam Schiff.  

Posted
5 minutes ago, MafiaMan said:

Four anonymous sources...former frat house brothers of Adam Schiff.  

I see.

Is that what the soon to be late Rush Limbaugh said?

Tick, tick, tick. .

Posted

Of course they do.  They swore an oath to uphold our Constitution, not an oath to uphold a cult. 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/more-200-retired-generals-admirals-endorse-biden-including-some-who-n1240842?cid=sm_npd_ms_fb_ma&fbclid=IwAR0ecCrk1x1Cg0LTgO5TF-Bh-TYPec2SKMpoHmElJKsp8dPqcLzIAyZ0nVI&fbclid=IwAR1ofZ3a4nkj_vCqLL_4Vlb90Ujf3pb0YG7JGj_lb69eQrgwibSfFqwHMEc

More than 200 retired generals and admirals endorsed Joe Biden for president in a letter published Thursday, saying he had the character and judgment to serve as commander-in-chief instead of President Donald Trump, who has failed "to meet challenges large or small."

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Redneksioux said:

 

Watch out Old Fella...

The Flop is about to age shame you.

Watch out everyone......Redneck is gonna cry about everyone needing to stay at home and wear a mask because he is too afraid to venture out......

Posted
15 hours ago, Redneksioux said:

I’m with you on this. I wouldn’t call for dr ox to lose his job. But I’d never take a family member in to see him.

You'd have to actually leave your house to bring one of them to Oxbow, so I think you are safe there. 

Posted
52 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

Of course they do.  They swore an oath to uphold our Constitution, not an oath to uphold a cult. 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/more-200-retired-generals-admirals-endorse-biden-including-some-who-n1240842?cid=sm_npd_ms_fb_ma&fbclid=IwAR0ecCrk1x1Cg0LTgO5TF-Bh-TYPec2SKMpoHmElJKsp8dPqcLzIAyZ0nVI&fbclid=IwAR1ofZ3a4nkj_vCqLL_4Vlb90Ujf3pb0YG7JGj_lb69eQrgwibSfFqwHMEc

More than 200 retired generals and admirals endorsed Joe Biden for president in a letter published Thursday, saying he had the character and judgment to serve as commander-in-chief instead of President Donald Trump, who has failed "to meet challenges large or small."

 

The Generals Are Hardly Objective, Unbiased Observers

Needless to say, this view of the generals veers far from the reality. Moreover, the generals may now be morally and ideologically compromised by their deep ties to weapons manufacturers and the corporate boards on which many generals serve.

In a blistering article published at the American Conservative last week, Hunter Derensis explains how the image of American generals as selfless public servants is long past its expiration date:

Perhaps Trump learned the hard way that the generals of the forever wars don’t measure up to the twentieth-century soldiers he adulated growing up.

For instance, when George Marshall oversaw the deployment of 8.3 million GIs across four continents in World War II, he did so with the assistance of only three other four-star generals. In retirement, Marshall refused to sit on any corporate boards, and passed on multiple lucrative book deals, lest he give the impression that he was profiting from his military record. As he told one publisher, “he had not spent his life serving the government in order to sell his life story to the Saturday Evening Post.”

Contrast that to the bloated, top-heavy military establishment of today, where an unprecedented forty-one four-star generals oversee only 1.3 million men[-] and women-at-arms. These men, selected and groomed because of their safe habits, spend years patting themselves on the back for managing wars-not-won, awaiting the day they can cash in. According to an analysis by The Boston Globe, in the mid-1990s nearly 50% of three- and four-star generals went on to work as consultants or executives for the arms industry. In 2006, at the height of the Iraq War, that number swelled to over 80% of retirees.

The examples are as endless as America’s foreign occupations: former Director of Naval Intelligence Jack Dorsett joined the board of Northrop-Grumman; he was later followed by former Air Force Chief of Staff Mark Welsh; meanwhile, former Vice Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff James Cartwright went to Raytheon; former Chairs of the Joint Chiefs—the highest ranking position in the military—William J. Crowe, John Shalikashvili, Richard Myers, and Joseph Dunford went on to work for General Dynamics, Boeing, Northrop-Grumman, and Lockheed-Martin, respectively.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/military-generals-are-just-another-group-self-interested-technocrats

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Nodak78 said:

 

The Generals Are Hardly Objective, Unbiased Observers

Needless to say, this view of the generals veers far from the reality. Moreover, the generals may now be morally and ideologically compromised by their deep ties to weapons manufacturers and the corporate boards on which many generals serve.

In a blistering article published at the American Conservative last week, Hunter Derensis explains how the image of American generals as selfless public servants is long past its expiration date:

Perhaps Trump learned the hard way that the generals of the forever wars don’t measure up to the twentieth-century soldiers he adulated growing up.

For instance, when George Marshall oversaw the deployment of 8.3 million GIs across four continents in World War II, he did so with the assistance of only three other four-star generals. In retirement, Marshall refused to sit on any corporate boards, and passed on multiple lucrative book deals, lest he give the impression that he was profiting from his military record. As he told one publisher, “he had not spent his life serving the government in order to sell his life story to the Saturday Evening Post.”

Contrast that to the bloated, top-heavy military establishment of today, where an unprecedented forty-one four-star generals oversee only 1.3 million men[-] and women-at-arms. These men, selected and groomed because of their safe habits, spend years patting themselves on the back for managing wars-not-won, awaiting the day they can cash in. According to an analysis by The Boston Globe, in the mid-1990s nearly 50% of three- and four-star generals went on to work as consultants or executives for the arms industry. In 2006, at the height of the Iraq War, that number swelled to over 80% of retirees.

The examples are as endless as America’s foreign occupations: former Director of Naval Intelligence Jack Dorsett joined the board of Northrop-Grumman; he was later followed by former Air Force Chief of Staff Mark Welsh; meanwhile, former Vice Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff James Cartwright went to Raytheon; former Chairs of the Joint Chiefs—the highest ranking position in the military—William J. Crowe, John Shalikashvili, Richard Myers, and Joseph Dunford went on to work for General Dynamics, Boeing, Northrop-Grumman, and Lockheed-Martin, respectively.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/military-generals-are-just-another-group-self-interested-technocrats

 

I see.

So. Cadet Bone Spurs doesn't like them.

Ooooh.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...