2TRU4U Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Yes and I'm simply saying bad losses hurt. Yes big wins help too, i never said they didn't. I was basing 7-4 teams with similar SOS and wins against similar caliber teams but one team loses to trash and the others worst loss is to an above 500 team. Committee will look at FBS win and PSU win long before ISU loss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMSioux Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Yes and I'm simply saying bad losses hurt. Yes big wins help too, i never said they didn't. I was basing 7-4 teams with similar SOS and wins against similar caliber teams but one team loses to trash and the others worst loss is to an above 500 team. Wish all you want but a win is still better than a loss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFMSGT Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Keaton.I see Reyes as an equally important. QB of the secondary. When he came back the defense played better. His first game back against Montana was getting his legs back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Yea that win against the worst Kansas team ever seemed to do just fine.plus they won 6-3...yeah six to three and they bragged about it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longtime fan Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 I see Reyes as an equally important. QB of the secondary. When he came back the defense played better. His first game back against Montana was getting his legs back. Both are very important and needed, as are plenty others. Reyes in my opinion is a more gifted athlete when you consider his size, speed and instincts for his position. Could be on some all American lists by his sen yr, special talent! The safety position is the last of line in the d, and it was very obvious when he was out, great to him have back. But I feel Keaton is more important as I feel the qb is the one position that you need the absolute right person, doesn't matter if he's sll American or not. There is just something about him that the team thrives off, whether it's his leadership skills , huddle presence or a combination of things but he just simply gets it done! He's 6-1 this season and 2-2 last yr as a true fresh. 8-3 is not bad as a true soph! Und the last 2 yrs without him are 3-8. He has above ave speed and athletic ability but is below ave in size 6'0" 190 for his position. Not sold on his arm strength, accuracy or decision making (yet) but the coaches will keep working with him to improve that and in time the accuracy and decision making should get better. Although he looked pretty good last week. He never panics and when it counts he simply makes the right call or play or both! Again, I can't stress enough on how the team particularly the offense just feeds of him. With the play of defense last week, I think they missed Drew Greeley more most have figured. A lot of that could have been to due to the bye week and some other factors but from view he was missed. Again, glad to have him back! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fightingsioux4life Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Both are very important and needed, as are plenty others. Reyes in my opinion is a more gifted athlete when you consider his size, speed and instincts for his position. Could be on some all American lists by his sen yr, special talent! The safety position is the last of line in the d, and it was very obvious when he was out, great to him have back. But I feel Keaton is more important as I feel the qb is the one position that you need the absolute right person, doesn't matter if he's sll American or not. There is just something about him that the team thrives off, whether it's his leadership skills , huddle presence or a combination of things but he just simply gets it done! He's 6-1 this season and 2-2 last yr as a true fresh. 8-3 is not bad as a true soph! Und the last 2 yrs without him are 3-8. He has above ave speed and athletic ability but is below ave in size 6'0" 190 for his position. Not sold on his arm strength, accuracy or decision making (yet) but the coaches will keep working with him to improve that and in time the accuracy and decision making should get better. Although he looked pretty good last week. He never panics and when it counts he simply makes the right call or play or both! Again, I can't stress enough on how the team particularly the offense just feeds of him. With the play of defense last week, I think they missed Drew Greeley more most have figured. A lot of that could have been to due to the bye week and some other factors but from view he was missed. Again, glad to have him back! If Studsrud improves his passing to match his running, he'll be close to unstoppable. The last time we had a QB like that was back in 2001 (Kelby Klosterman) and we all know how that season ended. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 If Studsrud improves his passing to match his running, he'll be close to unstoppable. The last time we had a QB like that was back in 2001 (Kelby Klosterman) and we all know how that season ended. If Studsrud didn't get hurt just think where this team would be sitting. It would be too bad if we beat Poly and miss the playoffs. This reminds me of the early 1990's where UND was close to breaking out only to miss the playoffs (I want to say 1991) if we are that far along in our rebuilding, that is very impressive since it took Roger 7 years to get to the playoffs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibleedgreen Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 plus they won 6-3...yeah six to three and they bragged about itA FBS win is a FBS win...I dont think we need to stoop to their level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlowHand Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Div I Football playoff selection scenarios.... Fun eh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post darell1976 Posted November 18, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted November 18, 2015 Div I Football playoff selection scenarios.... Fun eh? It sure beats that 4 team playoff joke of the FBS where most teams have no shot at all no matter their record. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fightingsioux4life Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 It sure beats that 4 team playoff joke of the FBS where most teams have no shot at all no matter their record.They should have started out with 8, not 4. But even that's better than the Bull Crap Series. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petey23 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 They should have started out with 8, not 4. But even that's better than the Bull Crap Series.Yep. Should have been 8 teams to start with and they only have to look at last year to realize it as the team that won the national title was only in the final 4 due to the money and markets the big 10 brings. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFMSGT Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Both are very important and needed, as are plenty others. Reyes in my opinion is a more gifted athlete when you consider his size, speed and instincts for his position. Could be on some all American lists by his sen yr, special talent! The safety position is the last of line in the d, and it was very obvious when he was out, great to him have back. But I feel Keaton is more important as I feel the qb is the one position that you need the absolute right person, doesn't matter if he's sll American or not. There is just something about him that the team thrives off, whether it's his leadership skills , huddle presence or a combination of things but he just simply gets it done! He's 6-1 this season and 2-2 last yr as a true fresh. 8-3 is not bad as a true soph! Und the last 2 yrs without him are 3-8. He has above ave speed and athletic ability but is below ave in size 6'0" 190 for his position. Not sold on his arm strength, accuracy or decision making (yet) but the coaches will keep working with him to improve that and in time the accuracy and decision making should get better. Although he looked pretty good last week. He never panics and when it counts he simply makes the right call or play or both! Again, I can't stress enough on how the team particularly the offense just feeds of him. With the play of defense last week, I think they missed Drew Greeley more most have figured. A lot of that could have been to due to the bye week and some other factors but from view he was missed. Again, glad to have him back! Don't get me wrong...I said in a previous post that Bartels played well when thrown in against ISU and good enough for us to beat Weber State, but Studs has "it" and we needed him back. On defense, Reyes makes the calls for the rest of the secondary and is a baller. They both have the "it" factor. Offense sells tickets, while defense wins championships. I am biased admittedly toward the defense. But Keaton is the right guy for the job. There is no disputing that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 (edited) They should have started out with 8, not 4. But even that's better than the Bull Crap Series.Very sad and pathetic excuse to weed out a National Champion. Edited November 18, 2015 by darell1976 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Don't get me wrong...I said in a previous post that Bartels played well when thrown in against ISU and good enough for us to beat Weber State, but Studs has "it" and we needed him back. On defense, Reyes makes the calls for the rest of the secondary and is a baller. They both have the "it" factor. Offense sells tickets, while defense wins championships. I am biased admittedly toward the defense. But Keaton is the right guy for the job. There is no disputing that. In no way was Batels good enough to win either game. He was terrible in every game he's played. He was a total liability. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawn-O Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Yep. Should have been 8 teams to start with and they only have to look at last year to realize it as the team that won the national title was only in the final 4 due to the money and markets the big 10 brings.that...and 59 donut on a neutral field... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petey23 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 that...and 59 donut on a neutral field...And a loss to the 10th best team from the ACC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFMSGT Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 In no way was Batels good enough to win either game. He was terrible in every game he's played. He was a total liability.Geaux Sioux, let me explain my rationale. I was at both games: ISU and Weber State. In both games the offense handed the defense a lead well into the 4th quarter and the defense couldnt make it stand up. To be specific, Bartels had a couple of TD passes at Weber St , if I rember correctly and the we had a 5 point lead with the ball 1st and 10, at our 40 yard line with 5:42 on the clock late in the game. Coming off of a 1st down conversion we should have run the ball on first down to get the clock moving (they only had two timeouts) but we attempted a pass with a full blitz on which lead to a sack strip fumble. He didnt play great in relief but he played good enough. In both games, the defense didnt rise up when needed. At the ISU game he made a few plays with his feet to extend drives and pick up 1st downs in the 4th. We couldnt stop their passing game. That's not any QBs fault. But as I agreed earlier, Keaton is the best option we have at QB. Thats not to slam Bartels in anyway. Keaton is better than I ever was and so is Bartels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Geaux Sioux, let me explain my rationale. I was at both games: ISU and Weber State. In both games the offense handed the defense a lead well into the 4th quarter and the defense couldnt make it stand up. To be specific, Bartels had a couple of TD passes at Weber St , if I rember correctly and the we had a 5 point lead with the ball 1st and 10, at our 40 yard line with 5:42 on the clock late in the game. Coming off of a 1st down conversion we should have run the ball on first down to get the clock moving (they only had two timeouts) but we attempted a pass with a full blitz on which lead to a sack strip fumble. He didnt play great in relief but he played good enough. In both games, the defense didnt rise up when needed. At the ISU game he made a few plays with his feet to extend drives and pick up 1st downs in the 4th. We couldnt stop their passing game. That's not any QBs fault. But as I agreed earlier, Keaton is the best option we have at QB. Thats not to slam Bartels in anyway. Keaton is better than I ever was and so is Bartels. Against Weber it was not the defense that handed them the ball deep in our territory, it was Bartels with one of the worst INTs I've ever seen and a fumble that should not have happened. What you failed to see was that with Bartels the offense did nothing in the fourth quarter. They sustain one drive in each of those fourth quarters and we win both. Unfortunately because of how bad Bartels was the defense stacked the box and dared us to throw, we couldn't, we lost. The defense was bad but Bartels was worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFMSGT Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Against Weber it was not the defense that handed them the ball deep in our territory, it was Bartels with one of the worst INTs I've ever seen and a fumble that should not have happened. What you failed to see was that with Bartels the offense did nothing in the fourth quarter. They sustain one drive in each of those fourth quarters and we win both. Unfortunately because of how bad Bartels was the defense stacked the box and dared us to throw, we couldn't, we lost. The defense was bad but Bartels was worse.If you look at the first few games of the season....the offense didn't do much in the 4th Qtr against WYO, Drake, NDSU (at all), UC Davis and that was with Keaton playing the whole game. In all of those games we squandered big leads or lost. I will say being their watching the Weber State game unfold, WSU gained momentum with huge pass plays that energized their fan base and defense. The #3 was a beast in the second half; he had two long receptions that flipped the field on us that lead to scores. Our running game had stalled because in my opinion Santiago was a little tired in late third and 4th qtr. If you add it all up, to include some curious play calling, Bartels' play was a sympton of larger problems. He was 9 fo 20 with 1 int int that game with two TDs, which had us in contention. The sack strip fumble was the back breaker before the INT. WSU had all the momentum so all we could do was milk the clock with 5:42 left, like a trainer protecting his fighter in the later rounds of a prize fight. If someone told you/me Bartels would throw two TDs against Cal Poly this week, I think all of us would take that in a heartbeat! I know I would. I just can't that loss all on him, sorry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND1983 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 The offense went 3 and out four times in the 4th quarter at Weber, IIRC. That kept defense on the field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND-FB-FAN Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 As much as UND relies on its defense, there still are some shortcomings on that side of the ball. Now, against Idaho State and Weber State, missing Cole Reyes was a huge miss for the UND secondary. Furthermore, UND needs more depth and playmakers in the backend; fortunately, the 2016 recruiting class already has some nice safety commits. As for the offense, the QB and WR position is a work in progress. I was very happy to see Keaton bring some consistency to the passing game the last two outings, with plays being made to Seibel, Georges, and Stanely. Studsrud is sharper with the intermediate to short passing game, and that's huge for the type of pro-style running offense that UND wants to employ. Studsrud going 13-16 (81%) was impressive. Now UND has to prove their offense can travel. If Studsrud puts up another efficient game (over 60% completion percentage and no interceptions) at Cal Poly, then I think UND will win. In all honesty, that kind of efficiency from the QB position will make UND hard to beat by anyone in the FCS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnboyND7 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Yep. Should have been 8 teams to start with and they only have to look at last year to realize it as the team that won the national title was only in the final 4 due to the money and markets the big 10 brings.Ohio state got in because they dominated at the end of the year. And they proved they were the best team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDColorado Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Ohio state got in because they dominated at the end of the year. And they proved they were the best team. Absolutely, they were on the bubble until they destroyed Wisconsin in the B1G championship game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petey23 Posted November 18, 2015 Share Posted November 18, 2015 Ohio state got in because they are from the biggest dollar conference. And they proved they were the best team at the end of the year which is all the more reason that the playoff field should have been 8 teams from the start.FYP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.