siouxfan512 Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Huh? He right. Great kid, just playing his worst game of the year and were not catching breaks. And you want to put in a kid that couldn't make it out of a single game this season. You are beyond retarded. Quote
neoflex Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 No other team has this crap luck that we have. Thus far we have outplayed them but 2 crossbars and a couple of crap goals and this looks like another disappointment. Just sick to my stomach. As we all are. Just dont know why UND is cursed in the semifinals Quote
rjjockers Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 I love Zane but this team lived and died by him this year and those two soft goals are the difference right now. Bingo Quote
siouxweet Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Well....I completly agree with you. This is getting pretty ridiculous. they eventually did win one though. Quote
snova4 Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Wow, some names I haven't seen on here in the past month. How is this game on Hak? Power play had looked 100x better than it has all season. Outside of their power play goals we've controlled play, plus our Hobey candidate has had a bad night to say the least. You dumb*$$3$ putting this on Hak are ridiculous. Outside the soft goals, this team came to play. 1 Quote
NewUNDAlum Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 As good as Zane is and has been there is truth to the criticism right now. The first goal wasn't his fault but at least 2 of the others needed to be saved. Quote
scpa0305 Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 And you want to put in a kid that couldn't make it out of a single game this season. You are beyond retarded. Excuse me? Quote
Csonked Out Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 This team lacks a finisher big time.... Quote
shep Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Only been one consistent thing. One championship game a decade ago to me is not the least acceptable. Going to the Frozen Four to consistently lose means nothing. Exactly! Quote
siouxfan512 Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Watch the game, it's a fact. Our Hobey Baker finalist is losing the game for us. He had clean looks and simply wiffed. And you trust who to be in net against these guys? Morons? Zane is NOT playing well .... how about the offense or the D that should clear the zone? Quote
nd jg Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 It seems like every year it's about "business." Screw that...I wish they'd focus on having fun. Agreed. Have some fun, and play with some emotion. Quote
siouxfan512 Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 This team lacks a finisher big time.... Boeser Quote
UND83 Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 OK Hak apologists. Woog and the Gophers lose 4 frozen fours and they become the Golden Chokers. Hak loses 7!! And he is still revered as the 2nd coming. Ya, I know Hak isn't playing blah blah blah, but what is the common denominator over the past 12 or whatever years. I'd much rather have some losing years and win a natty occasionally than this #&a7 Quote
Snake Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 I love Zane but this team lived and died by him this year and those two soft goals are the difference right now. The question is do the boys have what it takes to pick him up. He's the reason they're here. If only we could've turned the early 2nd period pressure into a 2-2 game... Quote
siouxfan512 Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Wow, some names I haven't seen on here in the past month. How is this game on Hak? Power play had looked 100x better than it has all season. Outside of their power play goals we've controlled play, plus our Hobey candidate has had a bad night to say the least. You dumb*$$3$ putting this on Hak are ridiculous. Outside the soft goals, this team came to play. This Quote
Daddy WarPipes Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Still have a chance. Everybody, and I mean everybody needs to play the final period like bangees. Man up guys. This can be one of the greatest comebacks and story lines in Sioux history. Leave it all on the ice dudes Quote
rjjockers Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Wow, some names I haven't seen on here in the past month. How is this game on Hak? Power play had looked 100x better than it has all season. Outside of their power play goals we've controlled play, plus our Hobey candidate has had a bad night to say the least. You dumb*$$3$ putting this on Hak are ridiculous. Outside the soft goals, this team came to play. Bottomline: This is a one and done tourney where you will face opponents for the first time all year, Hak has no clue how to get a team ready in that situation. 3, 5, or 7 Game series? We would win almost every year. Quote
Oxbow6 Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Radio guys.........one excuse after another. I love homers but come on. TH is better than this. Quote
Csonked Out Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Wow, some names I haven't seen on here in the past month. How is this game on Hak? Power play had looked 100x better than it has all season. Outside of their power play goals we've controlled play, plus our Hobey candidate has had a bad night to say the least. You dumb*$$3$ putting this on Hak are ridiculous. Outside the soft goals, this team came to play. The team really does look great tonight. They have good spacing, are pinching at the right times, and are getting there passes through. They have been dominating possession since half way through the 1st period and have played a style that can win this game. A couple power play goals from bad calls and a couple soft goals have cost this team tonight. I don't put this on Hakstol at all. P.S. I frickin hate Jack Eichel right now, damn is he good 1 Quote
snova4 Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 And you trust who to be in net against these guys? Morons? Zane is NOT playing well .... how about the offense or the D that should clear the zone? The only one this applies to is the first power play. Noone is blaming him for that one. Five hole on clean look, that's on Zane. The snipe, Zane should have had. The fourth, I personally think he should have stopped. Quote
Handsome Rob Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Same as every other year with hakstol ENOUGH with the hak trash talk - I am so sick of it. Hak is a great coach and we are LUCKY to have him man the helm. He gets the team prepared every year to succeed. He is NOT the guy out there passing the puck, stopping the shots, blocking shots, etc. hak doesn't get much props when the Sioux win but when the Sioux lose......my god, it's 200% his fault and then some - damn that guy! Jeez. Breathe people! If/when hak leaves for the pros (surprised it hasn't happened already) we will realize what we had with him and will be pleading for him to call me back. 1 Quote
neoflex Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Well...we can either have a spectacular finish...or end the game like we did in the F4 in Denver. Let's see who comes out Quote
johndahl Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 2nd period adjustment? Sure looked like it to me. It really felt like UND came to compete in the 2nd - a noticeable change in energy from the 1st. Quote
franchise Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Glad I felt BU was a huge favorite. Making it a little easier to take. One of those crossbars goes in and it's a different story Quote
MafiaMan Posted April 10, 2015 Posted April 10, 2015 Absolutely dominated 2/3 if not 3/4 of the period...and saw the deficit increase from 2 goals to 3. Stunning. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.