SIOUXFAN97 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 11 minutes ago, SWSiouxMN said: So UMKC to Summit.... Where does this leave Augie now? wow....umkc jumps conferences every 5 years...bye bye augie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 do we fly anywhere for men's and women's baseketball for summit league games...oral roberts is 13 hours!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothmog Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 10 minutes ago, bison73 said: Fact is it wasnt illegal drugs If it were illegal drugs law enforcement would be involved. They were and are not. Plus if it was illegal drugs there would have been no appeal to the NCAA and he would have lost his scholarship of which he didnt. The simplest explanation of the known facts is usually correct. For the caffeine explanation to be true all that is required is that one college student made a mistake in preparing for a very important game. No law enforcement, no conspiracy of NDSU players, coaches, etc. Just one guy drinking too many mountain dews while taking a supplement containing lots of caffeine, that's all. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdub27 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 28 minutes ago, bison73 said: If it were illegal drugs law enforcement would be involved. They were and are not. Not saying that there were "illegal drugs" involved in this instance but the statement that law enforcement would be be involved is absolutely false. Have any of the other players who have been dismissed or suspended for "violation of team rules" had law enforcement involved....? 11 minutes ago, Gothmog said: The simplest explanation of the known facts is usually correct. For the caffeine explanation to be true all that is required is that one college student made a mistake in preparing for a very important game. No law enforcement, no conspiracy of NDSU players, coaches, etc. Just one guy drinking too many mountain dews while taking a supplement containing lots of caffeine, that's all. One college student? Or a trusted staff member? There is a long list of banned stimulants and all we know is BR tested positive for one of them. He gave his side of the story to the paper, because he wanted to clear his name, yet he specifically didn't say it was caffeine. And the supplement that has been referenced to be the culprit is actually a low caffeine supplement, so either he was told to take a double/triple dose plus all this supposed Mt Dew, or you're just making things up as you go. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UNDBIZ Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Knowing we had a player suspended for a year for taking a stimulant popular among college students, that law enforcement didn't get involved, and that the stimulant wasn't caffeine, I see no reason to assume the ndsu player tested positive for drinking too many cokes, said the ndsu coaches gave him the substance, was thrown under the bus by ndsu coaches and staff, and has avoided publicly stating the substance was caffeine.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted June 24, 2019 Author Share Posted June 24, 2019 41 minutes ago, Gothmog said: Now you're claiming to know what a "neutral observer" might find peculiar about it? I'm by no means neutral, but the caffeine explanation seems to be, by far, the most likely to me. If it was caffeine, somebody officially just say it. Heck, you'll get pity from me: I'm on my second 0.5L of Diet Dew of the day after two cups of coffee this morning. Instead, there's a factual information void. Those are always filled by hearsay and speculation and innuendo. Yet they're letting that go on to the negative. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 The wording is interesting. If it was caffeine, you think that would choose different wording than saying that he tested positive for a banned substance, because caffeine isn't banned - having too much of it in your system is, right. So wouldn't they choose different wording? Words mean something. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted June 24, 2019 Author Share Posted June 24, 2019 Folks, please don't conflate "illegal" in the NCAA sense (banned) and "illegal" in the criminal code sense. All we know is Robbins' career is over due to an NCAA illegal (banned) substance. That substance is yet to be officially declared. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Would Robbin's former teammates have thrown Newman under the bus for caffeine? It's interesting that the former teammates knew exactly who to point the finger at, if it was really just too much caffeine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodak651 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 I don't buy the caffeine thing, but it was probably just something like creatine, which isn't that big of a deal. No matter what happened though, NDSU treated the guy like crap, and turned a non issue into a controversy. LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawn-O Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Just now, nodak651 said: I don't buy the caffeine thing, but it was probably just something like creatine, which isn't that big of a deal. No matter what happened though, NDSU treated the guy like crap, and turned a non issue into a controversy. LOL The kid's mom is an NDSU alum, member of their Athletic HOF, and the first All-American in the history of their WBB program. Correction, pissed off alum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 mods....this is conf realignment and the summit just added a decent school and we're talking about mountain dew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted June 24, 2019 Author Share Posted June 24, 2019 2 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: mods....this is conf realignment and the summit just added a decent school and we're talking about mountain dew? Diet. Point taken. SIOUXFAN97 is correct. Please perform a course correction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sicatoka Posted June 24, 2019 Author Share Posted June 24, 2019 3 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: mods....this is conf realignment and the summit just added a decent school and we're talking about mountain dew? Might I call that a tad strong. UMKC is what it is. Is UMKC called the Kangaroos because they keep hopping around conferences? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxphan27 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 1 hour ago, Gothmog said: Now you're claiming to know what a "neutral observer" might find peculiar about it? I'm by no means neutral, but the caffeine explanation seems to be, by far, the most likely to me. There’s an official “caffeine explanation”. ?? Well good- as that’s the link I’m waiting for you to provide.... whats that? Oh, caffeine is just the rumored substance of choice among bison fans? Ah, ok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxphan27 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 38 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: Might I call that a tad strong. UMKC is what it is. Is UMKC called the Kangaroos because they keep hopping around conferences? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 I think Augie should join as we need more teams to keep the conference strong and who knows what the future holds with teams like IPFW, Oral Roberts and Western Illinois. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 1 minute ago, darell1976 said: I think Augie should join as we need more teams to keep the conference strong and who knows what the future holds with teams like IPFW, Oral Roberts and Western Illinois. can't we just keep taking wac schools....nmsu and seattle would be nice gets...wac is losing bakersfield, umc, and woudn't be surprised if chicago state closed so for nmsu and seattle maybe a move to the summit will look better down the road. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Humboldt Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Plan on seeing Augie real soon. The UMKC move was just the preliminary round before Augustana. https://letsgodu.com/2019/06/24/why-baseball-and-augustana-college-drove-umkcs-summit-league-return/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 40 minutes ago, Humboldt said: Plan on seeing Augie real soon. The UMKC move was just the preliminary round before Augustana. https://letsgodu.com/2019/06/24/why-baseball-and-augustana-college-drove-umkcs-summit-league-return/ if we added baseball back would that keep little augie out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnboyND7 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 If Augie is able and willing to make the financial investment to be a Summit League institution, I would be fine with them coming. There are a lot of small schools in division 1 that do just fine at the D1 level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zonadub Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 19 hours ago, The Sicatoka said: Might I call that a tad strong. UMKC is what it is. Is UMKC called the Kangaroos because they keep hopping around conferences? At least UMKC is an established D-I school. (No transition period like Augustana or St Thomas will have) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yote 53 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 21 hours ago, SIOUXFAN97 said: if we added baseball back would that keep little augie out? Honestly, that's what the Summit members need to do. We need to make the hard choices and align our sports offerings. It's a shame that we have to entertain Augie because neither UND or USD offers baseball. So we have to bring in little Augustana, who somehow has the resources to offer a program that somehow neither UND or USD is able to offer. It should be a no-brainer, and a mandate from the league office, that both the Coyotes and F-Hawks add a baseball program. For that matter, accepting UMKC back should have been conditional that they also offer baseball. But at least the Roos offer men's soccer, so there is that. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SWSiouxMN Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 7 minutes ago, Yote 53 said: Honestly, that's what the Summit members need to do. We need to make the hard choices and align our sports offerings. It's a shame that we have to entertain Augie because neither UND or USD offers baseball. So we have to bring in little Augustana, who somehow has the resources to offer a program that somehow neither UND or USD is able to offer. It should be a no-brainer, and a mandate from the league office, that both the Coyotes and F-Hawks add a baseball program. For that matter, accepting UMKC back should have been conditional that they also offer baseball. But at least the Roos offer men's soccer, so there is that. In retrospect, they should have taken UND and UNC as affiliates way back when instead of letting them go to the WAC. UMKC does solve the Men's soccer issue for now, because it brings them to 7. Baseball isn't coming back to UND, Pandora's box is staying shut. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIOUXFAN97 Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 31 minutes ago, Yote 53 said: Honestly, that's what the Summit members need to do. We need to make the hard choices and align our sports offerings. It's a shame that we have to entertain Augie because neither UND or USD offers baseball. So we have to bring in little Augustana, who somehow has the resources to offer a program that somehow neither UND or USD is able to offer. It should be a no-brainer, and a mandate from the league office, that both the Coyotes and F-Hawks add a baseball program. For that matter, accepting UMKC back should have been conditional that they also offer baseball. But at least the Roos offer men's soccer, so there is that. agreed....u would think that conference members would work together to have a cohesive idea about which sports to sponsor or not with some being required...baseball at usd and und could be back in one year if needed... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.