Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

So if and when Berry has coached his last game , who would be the right person to take over ? We all know they will have to be part of the UND bloodline.  We thinking Finley ? St Claire ? Carl ? Or would we actually go outside the family and get someone like Garret Robain ?? Maybe Gage Ausmus as a dark horse as he captained us to the last natty and has the leadership qualities.

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
4 hours ago, MGsioux said:

So if and when Berry has coached his last game , who would be the right person to take over ? We all know they will have to be part of the UND bloodline.  We thinking Finley ? St Claire ? Carl ? Or would we actually go outside the family and get someone like Garret Robain ?? Maybe Gage Ausmus as a dark horse as he captained us to the last natty and has the leadership qualities.

Why are you assuming we all know that it will be someone from the family? Also, Finley? what has he done since his playing days to be considered a coach? 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Gwozdecky got let go for lack of NCAA tournament success towards the end of his tenure then you have Don Lucia who chose to step down realizing it was time for someone else to lead Minnesota.

Complacency leads to stagnation and decline. At some point, hard questions and decisions will need to happen whether it be UND or Berry. Whether it’s now or not, I do not know nor do I envy those in position that make such calls.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, gfhockey said:

Does Berry have lack of tournament success? Gotta make the tourney to have lack of success 

Even worse, it is both.

7 minutes ago, Shawn-O said:

Never in the history of NCAA DI hockey has so little been done with so much.  

Very Churchill :cool:

  • Upvote 3
Posted
4 hours ago, siouxkid12 said:

Why are you assuming we all know that it will be someone from the family? Also, Finley? what has he done since his playing days to be considered a coach? 

Because a new coach from outside the program might say "Why are all the fans cheering for them wearing jerseys from the past?  This team has a different name - hard to forge a new identity when you're weighed down by the past whether you like it or not."   A coach from outside the magical line of succession might be just what this team needs - to break free on a couple of levels! 

Posted
9 hours ago, MGsioux said:

So if and when Berry has coached his last game , who would be the right person to take over ? We all know they will have to be part of the UND bloodline.  We thinking Finley ? St Claire ? Carl ? Or would we actually go outside the family and get someone like Garret Robain ?? Maybe Gage Ausmus as a dark horse as he captained us to the last natty and has the leadership qualities.

I would hope that one of the most coveted coaching spots in college hockey wouldn't be taken by someone not currently coaching, and who's never coached.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
17 hours ago, MGsioux said:

So if and when Berry has coached his last game , who would be the right person to take over ? We all know they will have to be part of the UND bloodline.  We thinking Finley ? St Claire ? Carl ? Or would we actually go outside the family and get someone like Garret Robain ?? Maybe Gage Ausmus as a dark horse as he captained us to the last natty and has the leadership qualities.

Finley…Ausmus…are they even coaching wtf 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
9 hours ago, gfNDfan said:

Because a new coach from outside the program might say "Why are all the fans cheering for them wearing jerseys from the past?  This team has a different name - hard to forge a new identity when you're weighed down by the past whether you like it or not."   A coach from outside the magical line of succession might be just what this team needs - to break free on a couple of levels! 

I understand and I agree that if a new coach is found, someone from outside the family should be seriously considered. The original poster said that we all know that the next hire will be from within the family, I disagreed with his comment.

Posted
1 hour ago, scpa0305 said:

Finley…Ausmus…are they even coaching wtf 

How different can running a moving company really be from coaching one of the most prestigious college hockey programs in the country? Maybe we should consider Bochenski and he can be the first Mayor/Coach combo. He’ll need to literally win over his constituents every Friday and Saturday night

  • Upvote 1
Posted

If I recall, didn't Hak hand pick Berry, and Blais installed Hak...   Not an avid follower at the time (curse the per internet days) for the Gino to Blais change, is that a unique thing to UND hockey, coaches installing their own successor?

Posted
10 minutes ago, 90siouxfan said:

If I recall, didn't Hak hand pick Berry, and Blais installed Hak...   Not an avid follower at the time (curse the per internet days) for the Gino to Blais change, is that a unique thing to UND hockey, coaches installing their own successor?

Yes, you are correct. 

Posted

Makes a person wonder, why did Blais choose Hak over Berry,  they were both assistants under him?  IMHO, he chose correctly, although it's a very sketchy comparison as Hak had much different players, arena was new, times were different, etc

Posted
23 minutes ago, 90siouxfan said:

If I recall, didn't Hak hand pick Berry, and Blais installed Hak...   Not an avid follower at the time (curse the per internet days) for the Gino to Blais change, is that a unique thing to UND hockey, coaches installing their own successor?

might have hand picked him but the AD still had the final call.

Posted
11 minutes ago, 90siouxfan said:

Makes a person wonder, why did Blais choose Hak over Berry,  they were both assistants under him?  IMHO, he chose correctly, although it's a very sketchy comparison as Hak had much different players, arena was new, times were different, etc

As I recall, Hak had been a head coach in the USHL for about four years before coming over to UND.  After just a single season at UND, he was named "Associate Head Coach" which I interpret as sort of being second in command.  At that point I think Berry had only been at UND for maybe a year or so, and had no head coaching or professional coaching experience, so Hak seems like the natural selection for Blais to name as Associate Head Coach.

Blais obviously left under good circumstances, and wasn't fired, so I'm sure any support he gave for Hak being named his successor would be given some weight.

Then, after Blais left, and Berry spent a few years as an assistant, he went on to be an assistant at the professional level, before returning.  Once he returned, he spent another year as an assistant, and was then named "Associate Head Coach."  Thus, when Hak left, again under good terms, I assume his selection of Berry as Associate Head Coach, and any positive comments he made about Berry, carried some weight.

Posted

The game has changed. When the floodgates of NIL entered the conversation, it changed everything, even for hockey. It's not as apparent as it is in football, but it is heading in that direction. It's a young coach's game today, and older coaches, in general, are having a difficult time communicating with this pedigree of hockey players who are looking for that next-school-up, when it comes to $$ and playing time.  Berry is a coach of the past, and the game is passing him by. 

Whoever is on the radar for coaching, needs to be of the coaching capability in this new era of NCAA sports - of a pay-to-play. Scholarships and boarding just aren't enough these days. 

Posted
42 minutes ago, neoflex said:

The game has changed. When the floodgates of NIL entered the conversation, it changed everything, even for hockey. It's not as apparent as it is in football, but it is heading in that direction. It's a young coach's game today, and older coaches, in general, are having a difficult time communicating with this pedigree of hockey players who are looking for that next-school-up, when it comes to $$ and playing time.  Berry is a coach of the past, and the game is passing him by. 

Whoever is on the radar for coaching, needs to be of the coaching capability in this new era of NCAA sports - of a pay-to-play. Scholarships and boarding just aren't enough these days. 

So the coach needs to be able to fundraise. 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...