Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
15 hours ago, Wilbur said:

Wonder if the job was on the table before he spoke at the green/gold thing a week ago?

At minimum he had interviews about it.
Interesting given some of the commentary he made.

Posted

He was obviously looking to get out of SU. Based on what he is quoted as saying at their "emergency meeting" last week he can really fake sincerity.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JohnboyND7 said:

Is that even the case? 

Even most blue blood assistants don't make seven figures. USC is private so who knows if we'll ever even know.

My guess is he’ll make between 800k-1 mil

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

has anyone explained what connection(s) he has to anyone at usc........still wondering how he got this job

Dom and Kolpack speculated that Riley and Klieman are tight and Riley probably asked about him. Whatever people think of Entz he is/was regarded as a pretty elite defensive coach.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, petey23 said:

Dom and Kolpack speculated that Riley and Klieman are tight and Riley probably asked about him. Whatever people think of Entz he is/was regarded as a pretty elite defensive coach.

image.thumb.png.bc8d289645f2bb3739c3c3af5229cff9.png

Posted
On 12/10/2023 at 6:38 AM, HoopsFan03 said:

Don’t even worry. He’s bringing more fire this next season!!

What a laughable thought, and it is particularly unfortunate we have UND “supporters” who post that malarkey and actually believe it. Prolonged mediocrity is a mindset illness run rampant here with this fan base / group of supporters. 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

What a laughable thought, and it is particularly unfortunate we have UND “supporters” who post that malarkey and actually believe it. Prolonged mediocrity is a mindset illness run rampant here with this fan base / group of supporters. 

It's all coach-speak either way but I think it is also pretty fair to assume you would have also jumped all over a "business as usual" type of response. What actual type of (realistic) reaction/commentary would have passed muster?

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, jdub27 said:

It's all coach-speak either way but I think it is also pretty fair to assume you would have also jumped all over a "business as usual" type of response. What actual type of (realistic) reaction/commentary would have passed muster?

No response or commentary is acceptable at this point other than acknowledging change is the only way forward. Silence sometimes can speak the loudest, however. Of course, we’re limited by the rate of change based on unjustified extensions and mediocre expectations. 

Posted
1 minute ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

No response or commentary is acceptable at this point other than acknowledging change is the only way forward. Of course, we’re limited by the rate of change based on unjustified extensions and mediocre expectation. 

So nothing in the realistic realm because the head coach isn't getting 2 years of his contract bought out. Which is exactly what my point was.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, jdub27 said:

So nothing in the realistic realm because the head coach isn't getting 2 years of his contract bought out. Which is exactly what my point was.

If you can’t buy out a mediocre coach’s contract then you probably shouldn’t issue out those contracts after losing seasons …

but oh well, this point has been beaten to death. Hopefully Chaves has learned from this. UND athletics as a whole needs to learn and evolve from this, or else be left behind… again. 

Posted

Furman and Idaho both getting hit hard from the portal today. Looking at the MVFC teams, Northern Iowa / Youngstown seemed to have gotten it the worst. 

Posted

Wonder how the team responds to this.  Can't remember if it was Klieman or Bohl that left before the season ended?  One of them answered his cell phone at practice and accepted the job if I remember right.  Maybe I dreamt that.  

Posted
27 minutes ago, Wilbur said:

Wonder how the team responds to this.  Can't remember if it was Klieman or Bohl that left before the season ended?  One of them answered his cell phone at practice and accepted the job if I remember right.  Maybe I dreamt that.  

Bohl for sure stuck around. I think Klieman did too.

Brian Kelly was eating dinner on a recruiting visit, stepped out to take a call, came back and kept eating.....then an hour later it broke he took the LSU job..per the kid's dad.

Posted
21 minutes ago, JohnboyND7 said:

Bohl for sure stuck around. I think Klieman did too.

Brian Kelly was eating dinner on a recruiting visit, stepped out to take a call, came back and kept eating.....then an hour later it broke he took the LSU job..per the kid's dad.

They both stuck around. When Bohl left it got a little weird at practice as far as communications and recruiting went since they had named Klieman the next coach. So you had two camps of Coaches. Bohl and those going with him and Klieman and those that were staying with him....but they managed.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, petey23 said:

They both stuck around. When Bohl left it got a little weird at practice as far as communications and recruiting went since they had named Klieman the next coach. So you had two camps of Coaches. Bohl and those going with him and Klieman and those that were staying with him....but they managed.

This would be a fun problem to have.. would mean we have a coach that is being recruited to a better position and we were still in the playoffs.. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...