Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

My guess:

Senior-Sophomore --> Simpson-Schmaltz

Junior-Freshman --> Mattson-Ladue

(two from same class) --> Thompson-Stetcher

(two scratches) --> Ausmus, Panzarella

No. Wait. Wrong year. Let's go with ...

Mattson-Ladue

Schmaltz-Poolman

Thompson-Stecher

Ausmus, Panzarella

Posted

First off i think Schmaltz is going to be on the top line and will probly be the corner stone of our defence. And the only guy i wouldnt mind sitting is Mattson but he's a drafted seniour so its not gonna happen. And he cant keep sitting Ausmus cuz he's drafted, Stecher shouldnt sit and Keaton played to good last season and Poolman is spose to be good so small problem, who do you sit?

Schmaltz-Ladue

Mattson-Poolman, Ausmus

Stecher-Thompson

Or he sits Mattson and we get

Schmaltz-Ladue

Stecher-Poolman

Thompson-Ausmus

Sounds good!

Posted

First off i think Schmaltz is going to be on the top line and will probly be the corner stone of our defence. And the only guy i wouldnt mind sitting is Mattson but he's a drafted seniour so its not gonna happen. And he cant keep sitting Ausmus cuz he's drafted, Stecher shouldnt sit and Keaton played to good last season and Poolman is spose to be good so small problem, who do you sit?

Schmaltz-Ladue

Mattson-Poolman, Ausmus

Stecher-Thompson

Or he sits Mattson and we get

Schmaltz-Ladue

Stecher-Poolman

Thompson-Ausmus

Sounds good!

Sit Mattson???

Posted

Sit Mattson???

It honestly depends on which Mattson comes to campus this fall. If we see the Mattson who played at the beginning of last season, go ahead and sit him. If it's the Mattson who was playing by the end of the season, I just don't see him sitting.

Posted

It honestly depends on which Mattson comes to campus this fall. If we see the Mattson who played at the beginning of last season, go ahead and sit him. If it's the Mattson who was playing by the end of the season, I just don't see him sitting.

I'm going to go out on a hunch and say the only way he sits is if he's injured. Also, my guess is that he'll end up with 27+ pts.

Posted

First off i think Schmaltz is going to be on the top line and will probly be the corner stone of our defence. And the only guy i wouldnt mind sitting is Mattson but he's a drafted seniour so its not gonna happen. And he cant keep sitting Ausmus cuz he's drafted, Stecher shouldnt sit and Keaton played to good last season and Poolman is spose to be good so small problem, who do you sit?

Schmaltz-Ladue

Mattson-Poolman, Ausmus

Stecher-Thompson

Or he sits Mattson and we get

Schmaltz-Ladue

Stecher-Poolman

Thompson-Ausmus

Sounds good!

It's a nice problem to have since you know there's bound to be guys banged up throughout the season.

Posted

Roster to officially be released this afternoon.

North Dakota MHockey @UNDMHockey 2m

In need of a June hockey fix? We will unveil our incoming freshman class later this morning and the complete 2014-15 roster this afternoon.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Roster to officially be released this afternoon.

North Dakota MHockey @UNDMHockey 2m

In need of a June hockey fix? We will unveil our incoming freshman class later this morning and the complete 2014-15 roster this afternoon.

Sweet. I was starting into DTs. There's a fix.

Anyone predicting any surprises? I'm not.

G - Johnson

D - Poolman

F - Simonson, Olson, Schmaltz, Poganski

Posted

I like this bunch, a nice blend of highly talented true freshman with some highly talented overagers who put up very good numbers in the USHL. I think we have this year's Natty all locked up :)

Posted

My guess:

Senior-Sophomore --> Simpson-Schmaltz

Junior-Freshman --> Mattson-Ladue

(two from same class) --> Thompson-Stetcher

(two scratches) --> Ausmus, Panzarella

No. Wait. Wrong year. Let's go with ...

Mattson-Ladue

Schmaltz-Poolman

Thompson-Stecher

Ausmus, Panzarella

I don't think we will see Panzarella on defense, he played mostly forward at the end of last season.

Posted

...and that the Gophers still can't win a national championship.

Had they not won in 2002 and 2003, I'd agree with you on this. Man I wish that the Gopher title drought still extended back to 1979.

Posted

Had they not won in 2002 and 2003, I'd agree with you on this. Man I wish that the Gopher title drought still extended back to 1979.

I was just trying to be funny, you ruined it lol. At least we've won more Final 5s since then!!

Posted

I was just trying to be funny, you ruined it lol. At least we've won more Final 5s since then!!

stop it!!! we will start to have another thread of it is a failed season if we don't win a natty versus other season acomplishments and there are numerous of those already.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...