Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
53 minutes ago, SiouxVolley said:

The MAC, MWC, and SunBelt just laugh hysterically at NDSU’s inquiries.

NDSU has to get the Montanas, Idaho, EWU and Weber St and aboard the Summit, have the Summit start Fb, and go FBS.

What inquiries?????  Link????

Posted
7 hours ago, fightingsioux4life said:

Wall to wall juggernaut? Their MBB and WBB programs are in the toilet right now. Their other non-FB programs aren't much better.

If you really think people like myself are going to accept UND becoming a low-level Division I school forever, you are kidding yourself. UND alumni will not tolerate the current level of mediocrity in the athletic department forever. I think Bill Chaves will clean this mess up and get us back to winning.

:lol:

Posted
1 hour ago, SiouxVolley said:

They routinely happen at any level.

SO you’re saying that Larsen and Bresciani don’t want to see NDSU advance athletically?

 

1 hour ago, SiouxVolley said:

They routinely happen at any level.

SO you’re saying that Larsen and Bresciani don’t want to see NDSU advance athletically?

I didnt say anything.

 

But you said--- """The MAC, MWC, and SunBelt just laugh hysterically at NDSU’s inquiries. """ Proof or youre just lying again.

Posted

There will never be an FBS UND.  UND can’t afford the current D1 sports model. NDSU has an athletic budget of about 27 mill, UND 28 mill. UND has an extra million to run the hockey program?  

Mankato, Mn Duluth & St. Cloud are all D1 hockey D2 other sports  and they are all competitive, especially in hockey.

UNDs profile is about the same as those schools except UND is trying to fund a full, but shrinking, slate of D1 sports.  Over the past 10 years the success of UND has not kept pace because UND can’t afford their business model  

Because of the obvious funding shortfalls I think UNDs football future is continued mediocrity, non scholarship or simply dropping it like Omaha  They recognized the futility of the failed business model and dropped football.

 

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 4
Posted
23 hours ago, fightingsioux4life said:

Okay, tell me where I am wrong. I honestly don't follow NDSU athletics like UND athletics, so please educate me.

Track and Softball - they are extremely proud of their success in those sports.

Posted
On ‎2‎/‎2‎/‎2019 at 6:52 AM, Milo said:

I don’t think there is going to be any huge changes. It’s looking more and more like NDSU will get an FBS invite of some kind. The rest of us might rearrange the deck chairs a bit. 

Their success on the field is the result of that entire athletic department transforming itself into a wall-to-wall juggernaut.  Their success is huge financially, with the fans and on the field.  They have been building it for a generation or more and it’s really growing into something very impressive and primed for growth.  

Some people are starting to wonder if UND will even keep football.  The Omaha model for athletic budgets this size is more workable if you want D1 basketball.  otherwise a full slate of sports using the UMD model of D1 hockey  D2 football and other sports is successful for the schools using it.  We just don’t have the money to compete at this level in all sports.  By trying to do it, all sports are suffering.

 

The entire athletic department?  You sure about that?  NDSU is still very good in track and field and softball  but outside of that, not so much.  I would say their athletic department is a bit out of balance.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3
Posted
5 hours ago, Milo said:

There will never be an FBS UND.  UND can’t afford the current D1 sports model. NDSU has an athletic budget of about 27 mill, UND 28 mill. UND has an extra million to run the hockey program?  

Mankato, Mn Duluth & St. Cloud are all D1 hockey D2 other sports  and they are all competitive, especially in hockey.

UNDs profile is about the same as those schools except UND is trying to fund a full, but shrinking, slate of D1 sports.  Over the past 10 years the success of UND has not kept pace because UND can’t afford their business model  

Because of the obvious funding shortfalls I think UNDs football future is continued mediocrity, non scholarship or simply dropping it like Omaha  They recognized the futility of the failed business model and dropped football.

 

Appropriately named yourself Milo because you know you're a troll...  UND isn't cutting football so cut your shtick.  The budget is plenty big to be competitive in multiple sports.

RK School Confrence Total Rev Total Exp Total Allocated % Allocated
112 North Dakota Big Sky $28,201,349 $26,727,343 $13,107,939 46.48
113 Illinois State Mo. Valley $27,852,407 $25,144,172 $19,096,462 68.56
114 Wichita State Mo. Valley $27,791,259 $26,182,954 $7,879,317 28.35
115 North Dakota State Summit $27,267,507 $28,124,505 $7,880,233 28.9
116 Montana Big Sky $27,192,240 $21,206,839 $7,452,313 27.41
117 Towson CAA $26,989,399 $26,972,945 $23,576,513 87.35
118 Missouri State Mo. Valley $26,374,654 $26,374,654 $16,521,641 62.64
119 New Mexico State WAC $26,114,479 $23,507,513 $16,833,783 64.46
120 Ball State MAC $26,098,565 $27,410,745 $19,402,097 74.34
121 Northern Illinois MAC $25,795,597 $25,661,395 $16,816,199 65.19
122 Kennesaw State Atl Sun $25,326,240 $24,193,201 $19,449,114 76.79
123 Bowling Green MAC $25,303,291 $23,753,571 $15,882,246 62.77
124 Alabama at Birmingham C-USA $24,795,218 $23,803,547 $15,480,428 62.43
125 Louisiana Tech C-USA $24,722,695 $23,828,481 $10,687,030 43.23
126 Southern Mississippi C-USA $23,984,639 $25,251,618 $8,832,604 36.83
127 Idaho Big Sky $23,825,002 $22,817,285 $13,339,039 55.99
128 Albany Am East $23,502,958 $24,361,609 $18,174,536 77.33
129 Nebraska-Omaha Summit $22,956,239 $20,261,523 $12,063,520 52.55
130 Southern Illinois Mo. Valley $22,722,740 $26,785,157 $14,346,273 63.14
131 South Dakota State Summit $22,075,310 $20,880,295 $8,012,013 36.29
132 Montana State Big Sky $21,927,521 $20,768,973 $10,190,334 46.47
133 Vermont Am East $21,889,573 $22,060,888 $16,174,319 73.89
134 Maine Am East $20,941,860 $20,961,302 $14,181,546 67.72
135 California-Santa Barbara Big West $20,484,071 $22,293,939 $15,689,376 76.59
136 College of Charleston CAA $20,450,663 $19,931,472 $15,668,254 76.61
137 Long Beach State Big West $20,258,440 $20,214,762 $13,455,529 66.42
138 California-Irvine Big West $19,978,266 $20,562,643 $15,351,089 76.84
139 Massachusetts-Lowell Am East $19,931,925 $19,656,525 $16,926,691 84.92
140 Binghamton Am East $19,753,526 $19,139,662 $13,758,566 69.65
141 Northern Iowa Mo. Valley $19,497,119 $18,375,024 $9,284,499 47.62
142 California-Riverside Big West $19,362,719 $19,100,994 $17,034,255 87.97
143 South Dakota Summit $19,256,962 $18,904,718 $11,958,142 62.1
144 East Tennessee State Southern $18,870,608 $18,005,312 $13,550,570 71.81
145 Sam Houston State Southland $18,742,450 $18,315,142 $13,511,652 72.09
146 California State-Fullerton Big West $18,374,475 $18,374,475 $15,137,138 82.38
147 Northern Arizona Big Sky $18,353,486 $18,511,105 $13,878,065 75.62
148 Illinois-Chicago Horizon $18,197,670 $18,153,694 $13,557,842 74.5
149 California State-Northridge Big West $17,987,771 $16,714,774 $14,714,419 81.8
150 Prairie View A&M SWAC $17,851,213 $17,852,014 $13,128,636 73.54
151 Tennessee-Chattanooga Southern $17,804,067 $17,804,067 $12,374,312 69.5
152 Lamar Southland $17,746,157 $17,663,047 $14,516,935 81.8
153 Central Connecticut Northeast $17,616,876 $17,159,124 $14,353,603 81.48
154 Citadel Southern $17,610,176 $17,488,828 $10,793,876 61.29
155 Northern Colorado Big Sky $17,289,706 $15,905,651 $11,819,303 68.36
156 Maryland-Baltimore Cty Am East $17,217,652 $16,837,354 $13,938,512 80.95
157 Eastern Kentucky Ohio Valley $17,024,583 $17,024,584 $13,105,268 76.98
158 North Carolina Greensboro Southern $16,832,309 $16,697,946 $13,883,810 82.48
159 Jacksonville State Ohio Valley $16,761,667 $16,761,667 $12,506,361 74.61
160 Stephen F. Austin Southland $16,747,580 $16,866,267 $13,744,600 82.07
161 North Carolina Wilmington CAA $16,443,174 $14,877,642 $10,790,947 65.63
162 New Jersey Tech Atl Sun $16,323,383 $15,460,526 $14,334,140 87.81
163 Oakland Horizon $16,262,483 $15,839,499 $12,639,095 77.72
164 Louisiana-Monroe Sun Belt $16,132,421 $15,481,778 $7,213,515 44.71
165 Indiana State Mo. Valley $16,098,113 $15,262,080 $12,703,992 78.92
166 Florida Gulf Coast Atl Sun $15,954,757 $15,076,855 $10,294,846 64.53
167 California State-Bakersfield WAC $15,953,381 $16,134,125 $10,972,061 68.78
168 Austin Peay Ohio Valley $15,726,585 $15,122,198 $10,043,962 63.87
169 Murray State Ohio Valley $15,629,362 $16,006,494 $11,176,904 71.51
170 Youngstown State Horizon $15,410,657 $15,410,657 $10,401,241 67.49
171 Tennessee Tech Ohio Valley $15,051,335 $14,253,073 $11,177,822 74.26
172 Southeastern Louisiana Southland $15,027,967 $13,460,167 $9,231,824 61.43
173 Utah Valley WAC $15,010,051 $13,846,291 $11,558,640 77.01
174 Missouri-Kansas City WAC $14,807,781 $15,094,616 $11,457,416 77.37
175 Eastern Washington Big Sky $14,797,340 $15,753,819 $9,753,372 65.91
176 Texas-Rio Grande Valley WAC $14,638,376 $13,570,987 $12,428,726 84.91
177 Wisconsin-Milwaukee Horizon $14,382,462 $12,696,879 $11,014,524 76.58
178 Alabama State SWAC $14,374,967 $14,374,967 $10,463,940 72.79
179 Northern Kentucky Horizon $14,213,168 $14,634,532 $12,439,551 87.52
180 Texas-Arlington Sun Belt $14,054,524 $14,145,916 $10,583,191 75.3
181 Weber State Big Sky $13,855,419 $13,776,392 $9,098,743 65.67
182 Western Carolina Southern $13,723,606 $13,421,220 $8,683,872 63.28
183 Portland State Big Sky $13,684,434 $13,670,695 $10,207,232 74.59
184 Norfolk State MEAC $13,656,202 $13,656,202 $10,404,021 76.19
185 Northwestern State La Southland $13,607,151 $12,556,828 $8,159,894 59.97
186 Central Arkansas Southland $13,562,018 $12,840,593 $9,423,866 69.49
187 North Carolina Central MEAC $13,561,933 $13,029,240 $8,307,124 61.25
188 Southern SWAC $13,360,450 $13,538,874 $9,788,125 73.26
189 VMI Southern $13,359,816 $13,221,773 $6,157,119 46.09
190 Winthrop Big South $13,287,467 $13,878,823 $10,498,583 79.01
191 Idaho State Big Sky $13,228,486 $13,245,509 $8,870,960 67.06
192 Southern Utah Big Sky $13,143,866 $13,080,062 $8,907,617 67.77
193 Cleveland State Horizon $13,083,041 $13,083,041 $11,076,183 84.66
194 North Carolina A&T MEAC $13,075,494 $13,047,786 $9,387,605 71.8
195 Arkansas-Little Rock Sun Belt $13,004,365 $11,893,708 $8,418,178 64.73
196 Radford Big South $12,954,767 $12,910,385 $10,863,276 83.86
197 Texas A&M-Corpus Christi Southland $12,761,032 $11,910,883 $10,228,536 80.15
198 Delaware State MEAC $12,674,589 $13,663,806 $9,624,922 75.94
199 Tennessee State Ohio Valley $12,481,256 $12,481,256 $9,834,643 78.8
200 Morehead State Ohio Valley $12,147,957 $12,147,957 $10,346,029 85.17
201 Southeast Missouri State Ohio Valley $12,072,270 $12,470,732 $8,213,912 68.04
202 North Florida Atl Sun $12,051,332 $11,709,392 $8,541,251 70.87
203 Western Illinois Summit $11,944,035 $13,027,183 $8,925,255 74.73
204 Longwood Big South $11,876,406 $11,709,364 $9,985,131 84.08
205 McNeese State Southland $11,654,790 $11,653,016 $6,388,738 54.82
206 Eastern Illinois Ohio Valley $11,329,430 $12,087,294 $8,123,217 71.7
207 Tennessee-Martin Ohio Valley $11,308,729 $11,308,729 $8,179,059 72.33
208 Morgan State MEAC $11,023,152 $12,577,055 $8,934,865 81.06
209 Wright State Horizon $10,922,076 $12,756,674 $8,577,655 78.54
210 Texas Southern SWAC $10,899,527 $10,899,527 $8,961,264 82.22
211 Florida A&M MEAC $10,741,985 $10,741,985 $4,605,221 42.87
212 Indiana-Purdue Fort Wayne Summit $10,607,866 $10,379,794 $8,286,274 78.11
213 Indiana-Purdue Indianapolis Summit $10,143,238 $9,663,859 $8,473,586 83.54
214 Southern Illinois Edwardsville Ohio Valley $9,524,882 $9,039,224 $6,911,526 72.56
215 Jackson State SWAC $9,466,619 $10,236,424 $4,731,558 49.98
216 Wisconsin-Green Bay Horizon $9,390,830 $8,982,031 $4,948,008 52.69
217 Nicholls State Southland $8,463,641 $8,326,628 $5,243,798 61.96
218 North Carolina Asheville Big South $8,395,210 $8,343,404 $6,008,119 71.57
219 Arkansas-Pine Bluff SWAC $7,904,735 $7,770,869 $5,665,044 71.67
220 Grambling State SWAC $7,853,609 $10,019,059 $3,887,444 49.5
221 South Carolina Upstate Atl Sun $7,591,880 $7,575,272 $6,382,175 84.07
222 South Carolina State MEAC $7,232,850 $8,195,579 $3,441,735 47.58
223 Alcorn State SWAC $6,321,380 $6,280,710 $3,864,109 61.13
224 Maryland-Eastern Shore MEAC $5,916,647 $5,916,647 $4,456,455 75.32
225 New Orleans Southland $5,819,807 $5,819,807 $3,972,948 68.27
226 Chicago State WAC $5,249,433 $5,057,856 $4,248,483 80.93
227 Savannah State MEAC $4,508,343 $6,150,265 $2,852,372 63.27
228 Mississippi Valley State SWAC $4,332,784 $4,335,851 $2,146,526 49.54
229 Coppin State MEAC $3,452,610 $4,360,469 $2,472,427 71.61
230 Alabama A&M SWAC $3,293,950 $9,466,448 $342,723 10.4

 

Posted

This is the norm in D-I athletics. How much do you hear about Clemson or Alabama basketball or Duke or Kansas football. Most schools have a sport they use to fund the rest of their athletic department.

Posted

Hi Nodak 651.  My figures must be a bit older than yours because you show UND and NDSU around 28 each and NDSU doesn’t have hockey.  I’m not sure what hockey costs but after that’s paid for what’s left might be approaching Augies projected 12 million which is an average D2 budget and low D1 FCS budget. Mankato, Mn Duluth and St Cloud knew this.

Women’s hockey was sacred too.  Baseball is gone.  Golf was saved by private donations.  I don’t know what will happen to the UND football program but my point is there is not going to be any FBS UND  I believe it’s more likely UND goes non scholarship or drops it completely.  Otherwise budget wise, after hockey is paid for, UND is near, but not at,  the bottom of the expenditures budget in the MVFC with some left over for the other sports.  

 

Posted

A sensible and realistic discussion of budgets appropriately proceeds any serious discussion of what form the FBS move will take. Hardly trolling.  Augie is worried about the move to D1 with only 12 million.  Most think they can’t afford to be successful in the MVFC.

YSU is an average program with average success since NDSU joined the MVFC.  The Penguins in an Augie like fashion have even been able to beat the Bison a few times in those 10 years or so. Youngstown is at about 15 mill. They are competing against 8 time FCS National Champions NDSU at 27 million.  Neither school has hockey but NDSU has 12 million more to help the football program.

UND has about the same 12 million in excess over YSU but has to fund hockey.  With only about 15 mill for all programs other than hockey, funding will be at a mediocre FCS level..  At the same time the demands of hockey will not get any cheaper.   

it looks like a move to non-scholarship, dropping football all together or simply returning to the more affordable Mankato model is more likely than some far fetched FBS move requiring huge shifts in budget and conference landscape.  it’s just not realistic until there is money to fund it.  

UND will compete in the MVFC with funding for football in the bottom half of the conference  NDSU will compete with the highest funding for football as they do now.  The Bison have 8 national championships since making the move  UND has 1 playoff loss at home.  That is a reflection of funding unless there is going to be a discussion on which school is getting the most bang for the buck.  Could there be that much difference in the efficiency NDSU has shown in spending their money or are they simply enjoying the extras of a bigger budget for football?  

To me NDSU has far more to spend on football and dollar for dollar their skill at spending it is near the top of college football making their FBS chances more likely which is why NDSU is often mentioned in national discussions as a possible candidate for the Mountain West or MAC.

 

 

Posted

The above figures show UND about average with other FCS schools on what they spend on sports .  This is what I have been saying in other thread here is getting more people attending UND sports other than Hockey is critical to helping keep UND sports more competitive for the future. NDSU has more costly sports to cover than UND with SU having wrestling and baseball compared to UND other sports of tennis, golf, track for the men and on the women's side they are comparably the same. But getting back to getting attendance to the games is key to funding the sports programs for the school. If football could get place close to full would mean at least another couple thousand people or total of another 10000 people at $15.00 we would have another 150000 of revenue from football and I would guess it would even be more than that. same thing for Basketball programs extra 1000 in attendance would another 300,000. These improvements would add half million to the programs. Also football has gone to playing FCS program here again that can add up to million dollars to the program. These may not seem like big changes but revenue increases for the sports. I would think with added attendance other streams of revenue would also increase because of the exposure this provides for suppliers and advertisers for the sports programs. I would also think our traveling expenses for our sports programs should be coming down as we get transitioned to new conferences in next year or so. Where we are not paying for airline travel were back to traveling on buses. I also think the conferences should be working on combining of traveling expenses to reduce costs for all teams traveling and working system where they can get two dates done with one travel time. Because looking at other schools in conference they are experiencing same problems with budgets. I look at above figures it shows that anyone thinks smaller division I schools are going to compete with large division schools in sports on major sports is just fooling themselves. It is possible on lesser sports to compete because major colleges may just not invest time or money in those sports. But major universities are going invest big money in football, basketball, baseball, hockey, volleyball, Lacrosse, softball and maybe track the majority of sports we sponsor here in north Dakota.  

Posted

If the claim is average funding at UND with 27 million and hockey, one comes to the conclusion schools like NDSU & SDSU with similar budgets and no hockey are funding at a rate much above average.  That is of course my point:  those programs are already close to FBS spending and so are their results. UND May have the smallest D1 athletic budget in the country among schools funding hockey along with a full slate of D1 sports. 

Money is tight. The move out of the Big Sky was a survival move. A move to FBS will be a return to big travel and huge additional expenses in scholarships, coaches salaries etc.  All of these dollars will have to be found and hoping for higher attendance won’t do it. 

When the mighty land grants announced their plans I think UND was correct when they said the division 1 move made no financial sense. It didn’t for UND.  Mankato, Omaha, UMD and St Cloud knew this too.  Without concrete solutions to these financial problems FBS is a pipe dream for UND.  In fact, the move up  has been a disaster for athletics at UND while St Cloud and the others have enjoyed ongoing success. 

Posted

Bowling Green offers hockey and FBS at a budget less than UND has.

Any talk of NDSU and SDSU getting into the MWC or MAC is total nonsense.  Those conferences only get 10 shares of the CFP and they have more than 10 members.

Before the CFP, the MAC invited Temple, UCF and U Mass as associate fb members because they are in enormous media markets, but those schools refused full memberships..m

The MWC took SJSU because it thought it needed a Bay Area presence for TV.  SJSU was taken over NMSU just based on media.

 

 

Posted
29 minutes ago, Milo said:

When the mighty land grants ... 

"Land grant" is an anachronism that allow some to believe a university should be judged by a title. It's a hand-hold for the weak. It's straight out of the 1800s, literally. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, Milo said:

If the claim is average funding at UND with 27 million and hockey, one comes to the conclusion schools like NDSU & SDSU with similar budgets and no hockey are funding at a rate much above average.  That is of course my point:  those programs are already close to FBS spending and so are their results. UND May have the smallest D1 athletic budget in the country among schools funding hockey along with a full slate of D1 sports. 

Money is tight. The move out of the Big Sky was a survival move. A move to FBS will be a return to big travel and huge additional expenses in scholarships, coaches salaries etc.  All of these dollars will have to be found and hoping for higher attendance won’t do it. 

When the mighty land grants announced their plans I think UND was correct when they said the division 1 move made no financial sense. It didn’t for UND.  Mankato, Omaha, UMD and St Cloud knew this too.  Without concrete solutions to these financial problems FBS is a pipe dream for UND.  In fact, the move up  has been a disaster for athletics at UND while St Cloud and the others have enjoyed ongoing success. 

How does your NDSU afford the move to FBS?  They can't increase attendance without building a new stadium and this time won't be able to do it with the city's help.  Sports 2-4 are floundering and have been a mess recently.  Attendance can only go up slightly, but you see that happening with a new schedule of MAC teams that nobody in Fargo cares about?  The savings from the Summit/MVFC are big for the Dakota schools and if NDSU goes FBS, they'll lose that in order to play games against exciting teams like Eastern Michigan,  Kent State and Buffalo.  Take a look at the average MAC home football schedule against FBS opponents:

-Syracuse (ACC) at Western Michigan, on Aug. 31 (CBS Sports Network);
-Cincinnati (American) at Miami on Sept. 8 (at Paul Brown Stadium);
-Kansas (Big-12) at Central Michigan on Sept. 8;
-Maryland (Big Ten) at Bowling Green on Sept. 8;
-Utah (Pac-12) at NIU on Sept. 8;
-Miami (Fla.) (ACC) at Toledo on Sept. 15;
-Western Kentucky (C-USA) at Ball State on Sept. 22;
-Army (Independent) at Buffalo on Sept. 29;
-UMass (Independent) at Ohio on Sept. 29;
-Army (Independent) at Eastern Michigan on Oct. 27.

I don't think moving up makes sense for any of the local schools because attendance can't grow with the cost of the move.  Even with new stadiums, you'll run out of people to go to games.  Throw in a few down years, the ability to not play for a national championship and games against teams people have never heard of and you're not generating the millions of dollars it's going to cost to move up.

Posted

Frankly, the only way FBS makes sense for any FCS school in the Great Continental Void (Superior WI, to Branson, MO, to St George, UT, to Spokane WA) is if a group of them band together and make it happen for themselves. 

Look at where G5 FBS works: geographically dense MAC, geographically dense Sun Belt

Yes, my Great Continental Void is not geographically dense, but it's as good as teams in there can hope for. And worse? Teams from outside that realm have better game options closer to home. They don't want to travel to the Void. There's no benefit to them. 

Posted

Here are some actual numbers instead of rambling that makes no sense.

MVFC "Revenues"
UND - $28.2 million
ISU - $27.9 million
NDSU - $27.3 million
MSU - $26.4 million
UND w/o MIH - $23.0 million
SIU - $22.1 million
SDSU - $22.1 million
UNI - $19.5 million
USD - $19.3 million
ISU - $16.1 million
YSU - $15.4 million
WIU - $11.9 million

While those numbers don't actually tell anywhere near a full story, the ballpark of what men's hockey directly adds to it is $5.2 million. UND also just improved the expense side of their equation by about $3 million, which will start reflecting on the next report that is released. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted

I am confused.  Is the Bison fan saying that UND's athletic budget is $27 million, but take out hockey and it's $15 million?  So hockey costs $12 million?  What about hockey revenues?  Hockey is cash flow positive, pays for itself and helps fund other sports.  How is that a problem exactly?

  • Upvote 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, Yote 53 said:

I am confused.  Is the Bison fan saying that UND's athletic budget is $27 million, but take out hockey and it's $15 million?  So hockey costs $12 million?  What about hockey revenues?  Hockey is cash flow positive, pays for itself and helps fund other sports.  How is that a problem exactly?

You see through the fallacy of the argument given. 

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...