tnt Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 15 hours ago, geaux_sioux said: Good. That’s what happens with good programs at this level. Coaches move on up. Exactly. If guys have chances to move up the team has most likely been successful. And if the team is successful, it makes it much easier to replace a coach that moves on with an attractive candidate. 2 Quote
sioux24/7 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago I don’t know for sure but seems like Jimmy wanted to pound the rock and I wouldn’t say that exactly aligns with Danny’s style. I would think Schmidt would want to pound the rock as well but maybe not as extreme as Jimmy wanted out in Wazzu? Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 7 minutes ago, sioux24/7 said: I don’t know for sure but seems like Jimmy wanted to pound the rock and I wouldn’t say that exactly aligns with Danny’s style. I would think Schmidt would want to pound the rock as well but maybe not as extreme as Jimmy wanted out in Wazzu? I don't think Schmidt would bring in someone that doesn't align with his vision of the program. Quote
GoodGood Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 5 minutes ago, fightingsioux4life said: I don't think Schmidt would bring in someone that doesn't align with his vision of the program. I didn’t think Roger’s would bring in someone that didn’t align with his vision for the program yet here we are Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Just now, GoodGood said: I didn’t think Roger’s would bring in someone that didn’t align with his vision for the program yet here we are Schmidt knows he needs to fix the offense. If he thinks this is a good hire, I am inclined to believe him. If Danny ends up being Fruechte 2.0, I will not hesitate to call out Schmidt AND Danny for it. Quote
geaux_sioux Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago We will find out what balance they choose to strike this season. Not being able to pass the ball killed us against whatever state down in Texas. It was too easy for them to tee off on our run game. 1 Quote
Siouxperman8 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 2 hours ago, RhettRingers said: He was pass game coordinator so yes he did call plays at SDSU. Get your facts straight. not looking to be snarky but I'd assume that OC has final say on play calling. The passing game coordinator generally develops the passing game routes, passing game plan, etc. and provides input but doesn't call plays. Reading online, that seems like the normal setup. Maybe they had a different arrangement Quote
RhettRingers Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Siouxperman8 said: not looking to be snarky but I'd assume that OC has final say on play calling. The passing game coordinator generally develops the passing game routes, passing game plan, etc. and provides input but doesn't call plays. Reading online, that seems like the normal setup. Maybe they had a different arrangement Well he was technically Co-Offensive Coordinator w/ Ryan Olson who is now at Northwestern. Ryan was the O-line coach and run game specialist while at SDSU. I think in passing down situations Danny made the call... Quote
gfhockey Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Siouxperman8 said: not looking to be snarky but I'd assume that OC has final say on play calling. The passing game coordinator generally develops the passing game routes, passing game plan, etc. and provides input but doesn't call plays. Reading online, that seems like the normal setup. Maybe they had a different arrangement That Is what I heard too Quote
jdub27 Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 1 hour ago, gfhockey said: That Is what I heard too Did Miller recently tweet it? 1 Quote
GoodGood Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 1 hour ago, RhettRingers said: Well he was technically Co-Offensive Coordinator w/ Ryan Olson who is now at Northwestern. Ryan was the O-line coach and run game specialist while at SDSU. I think in passing down situations Danny made the call... Danny did not call plays at SDSU 2 Quote
FSSD Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 5 hours ago, UNDBIZ said: Judging by how the WSU offense performed without Rodgers, I'd guess he and Danny were butting heads throughout the season regarding play-calling. Maybe it was the change in conferences and location? Midwest OL and running game vs Northwest producing QB and WRs. Quote
gfhockey Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 1 hour ago, GoodGood said: Danny did not call plays at SDSU Agreed but apparently I’m in the wrong 1 Quote
Siouxphan27 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago all the talk about Danny and whether or not he was making the calls reminded me of these old NFL commercials. a trip down memory lane... Quote
UND69er Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 5 hours ago, GoodGood said: I didn’t think Roger’s would bring in someone that didn’t align with his vision for the program yet here we are I am a long ways from a coaching expert, but Rogers ascent has seemed a bit odd and overzealous to me. Took over for a legend at SDSU, only 2 years of great success, moved to WSU for 2 years with marginal success. Now moving to ISU and 50 players there hit the portal. Seems like some or all of this is premature. Also odd that he could not find a way to fit Danny into his plans somewhere after Danny made the move to Brookings. FWIW. 1 Quote
KBH2010 Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 1 hour ago, UND69er said: I am a long ways from a coaching expert, but Rogers ascent has seemed a bit odd and overzealous to me. Took over for a legend at SDSU, only 2 years of great success, moved to WSU for 2 years with marginal success. Now moving to ISU and 50 players there hit the portal. Seems like some or all of this is premature. Also odd that he could not find a way to fit Danny into his plans somewhere after Danny made the move to Brookings. FWIW. Only 1 year at WSU. Quote
UND69er Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 12 minutes ago, KBH2010 said: Only 1 year at WSU. Even crazier! Quote
Sioux94 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 5 hours ago, UND69er said: I am a long ways from a coaching expert, but Rogers ascent has seemed a bit odd and overzealous to me. Took over for a legend at SDSU, only 2 years of great success, moved to WSU for 2 years with marginal success. Now moving to ISU and 50 players there hit the portal. Seems like some or all of this is premature. Also odd that he could not find a way to fit Danny into his plans somewhere after Danny made the move to Brookings. FWIW. I agree with you, but everyone seems to want a so called 'hot and upcoming' young coach these days. Michigan taking Utah's coach though was the exact opposite of that. He seems like a good guy and I'll be rooting for him to do well, even though I'm not necessarily a Michigan fan. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.