AJS Posted Wednesday at 12:28 PM Posted Wednesday at 12:28 PM 16 hours ago, geaux_sioux said: I would expect a lot of guys from the defense in the portal at some point. You need all hands on deck with returning D-Line & Secondary. LB clearly is a different story. Between incoming FR class and returners, you need 1/2 that amount. Numbers game. Those spots you use to add D-Line & Secondary from the portal. Quote
forksandspoons Posted Wednesday at 02:15 PM Author Posted Wednesday at 02:15 PM 10 hours ago, jdub27 said: Nope. Any ideas who they’re after? Looks like Isaac is following quite a few recent QB portal entrants Quote
UND1983 Posted Wednesday at 02:21 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:21 PM I am hearing the new coach is not happy with much of anything on this roster. We have been conditioned to think we had a good enough roster. Not the case 4 Quote
forksandspoons Posted Wednesday at 02:26 PM Author Posted Wednesday at 02:26 PM 3 minutes ago, sioux24/7 said: Bummer. Liked how hard he ran. Good luck to Hunt! Hope he finds a starting job somewhere 4 Quote
MoSiouxFan Posted Wednesday at 02:31 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:31 PM 3 minutes ago, forksandspoons said: Bummer. Liked how hard he ran. Good luck to Hunt! Hope he finds a starting job somewhere Definitely good enough to be a 1 or 2 guy at many schools. Wish he would have stayed, but can't blame him for hitting the portal. Great kick returner. 1 Quote
iramurphy Posted Wednesday at 02:35 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:35 PM 8 minutes ago, sioux24/7 said: This one is a big loss. He averaged over 13 yds per carry, always ran hard, broke tackles. RB was probably our deepest position but he deserved more touches. I thought he would be one of our top 2 RB’s next fall. I see it as a red flag. Quote
Siouxperman8 Posted Wednesday at 02:36 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:36 PM 12 minutes ago, UND1983 said: I am hearing the new coach is not happy with much of anything on this roster. We have been conditioned to think we had a good enough roster. Not the case I think most on here have said that we haven’t had the talent level of the top teams. We won games when we played our best but there hasn’t been any margin for error. Any letdown at all and we lost games. 2 Quote
sioux24/7 Posted Wednesday at 02:41 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:41 PM 5 minutes ago, iramurphy said: This one is a big loss. He averaged over 13 yds per carry, always ran hard, broke tackles. RB was probably our deepest position but he deserved more touches. I thought he would be one of our top 2 RB’s next fall. I see it as a red flag. Hard to blame him. Consistently produced and was only given opportunities in mop up time really. Will still be hard to crack with Ziebarth and Seidl. 1 Quote
gundy1124 Posted Wednesday at 02:45 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:45 PM 12 hours ago, forksandspoons said: Looks like the 1883 Collective is no longer taboo, welcome to the new reality of football UND. 1 Quote
GoHawks Posted Wednesday at 02:47 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:47 PM 10 hours ago, jdub27 said: Nope. Think someone said he already had a offer from Wisconsin so it is unlikely. Quote
jdub27 Posted Wednesday at 02:48 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:48 PM 33 minutes ago, forksandspoons said: Any ideas who they’re after? Looks like Isaac is following quite a few recent QB portal entrants I don't. But I don't believe they have interest in the SDSU transfer. Probably fair to say the new HC has a good idea on whether he would be a good fit or not. Quote
CMSioux Posted Wednesday at 02:49 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:49 PM 27 minutes ago, sioux24/7 said: He made the most of his time on the field, just could not crack the line up. Best wishes. 1 Quote
SuhakiYeahYeah Posted Wednesday at 02:52 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:52 PM 30 minutes ago, sioux24/7 said: Greatest garbage time player in D1 history, best of luck Quote
sioux24/7 Posted Wednesday at 03:08 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:08 PM 19 minutes ago, GoHawks said: Think someone said he already had an offer from Wisconsin so it is unlikely. That was another QB that ended up committing to Wisconsin. Quote
iramurphy Posted Wednesday at 03:09 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:09 PM (edited) 1 hour ago, UND1983 said: I am hearing the new coach is not happy with much of anything on this roster. We have been conditioned to think we had a good enough roster. Not the case I am not doubting your statement, but wonder who you are hearing that from. It was clear we have roster needs, but anyone who watched film would be looking forward to a backfield with Seidel Ziebarth and Hunt next fall. Losing Hunt is a big loss. The oline needs to keep improving but should be better next fall. We have guys on this roster who can play but need to get stronger, continue to develop and be put in a position to succeed. I guess we will see over the next few weeks if the new staff can maintain the enthusiasm and momentum created with the new hire. Still waiting for the new staff to be announced and help upgrade the roster. Edited Wednesday at 03:38 PM by iramurphy Forgot Ziebarth is a junior 2 Quote
SiouxBoys Posted Wednesday at 03:15 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:15 PM 39 minutes ago, iramurphy said: This one is a big loss. He averaged over 13 yds per carry, always ran hard, broke tackles. RB was probably our deepest position but he deserved more touches. I thought he would be one of our top 2 RB’s next fall. I see it as a red flag. Who did you have him jumping in the RB room next fall? Quote
GoodGood Posted Wednesday at 03:27 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:27 PM This team lost to Indiana State. Not a single player that can’t be replaced 1 5 2 Quote
UND1983 Posted Wednesday at 03:30 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:30 PM 1 minute ago, GoodGood said: This team lost to Indiana State. Not a single player that can’t be replaced But according to our fans on here we have ALOT of solid building blocks! No we don't. We have some decent players and a lot of bad ones thanks to the prior staff's inability to bring the program up to date. 3 Quote
SIOUX29 Posted Wednesday at 03:32 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:32 PM Isn't Ziebarth back next year? Quote
SIOUXFAN97 Posted Wednesday at 03:34 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:34 PM 6 minutes ago, GoodGood said: This team lost to Indiana State. Not a single player that can’t be replaced and coaches...but apparently not. 2 Quote
iramurphy Posted Wednesday at 03:35 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:35 PM Just now, SIOUX29 said: Isn't Ziebarth back next year? Yes, my mistake. He and Seidel will be 1-2. Hunt would be in the mix but not critical loss however, I liked how hard he runs. 1 Quote
iramurphy Posted Wednesday at 03:36 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:36 PM 19 minutes ago, SiouxBoys said: Who did you have him jumping in the RB room next fall? My mistake. Ziebarth and Seidel are both back. I still like Hunt and thought he would be in the mix. Quote
SiouxBoys Posted Wednesday at 03:41 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:41 PM 1 minute ago, iramurphy said: My mistake. Ziebarth and Seidel are both back. I still like Hunt and thought he would be in the mix. I really liked Colton Brunell's film out of high school. Want to see him get some touches. Also, really like the way Romfo runs. Then the kid out of Maple Grove runs a lot like Otis did. I think RB room is plenty fine. Quote
iramurphy Posted Wednesday at 03:50 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:50 PM 9 minutes ago, SiouxBoys said: I really liked Colton Brunell's film out of high school. Want to see him get some touches. Also, really like the way Romfo runs. Then the kid out of Maple Grove runs a lot like Otis did. I think RB room is plenty fine. You are probably correct 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.