Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, JohnboyND7 said:

Born on the base. Not raised, don't currently live there either. I enjoy Grand Forks quite a lot. Such a shame we didn't go the Wyoming route and just have one state school. Alas....

Would have been a good model for both Dakotas and Montana (and probably Idaho).

  • Upvote 1
Posted
7 hours ago, gfhockey said:

Didn’t minot bankrupt the state fair 

No, an idiot that ran the foundation and took Minot country club and a few others along for the ride 

Posted
1 hour ago, SiouxFan100 said:

Do we still need a “nose tackle” as such? Maybe just called a tackle going forward 

4 man fronts typically have a Nose and a Tackle.  Nose is more of a big body that plays a 1 Technique and a Tackle can be a bit smaller (still big) but plays in more of a 3 Technique.  So yes, there will still be a Nose.

  • Upvote 4
Posted
23 hours ago, Kab said:

No, an idiot that ran the foundation and took Minot country club and a few others along for the ride 

Correct. Although the country club was going bankrupt anyway. They did find buyers for it though. 

Posted
On 12/15/2024 at 8:52 PM, Player21 said:

4 man fronts typically have a Nose and a Tackle.  Nose is more of a big body that plays a 1 Technique and a Tackle can be a bit smaller (still big) but plays in more of a 3 Technique.  So yes, there will still be a Nose.

I really like the idea of 4-2-5 - it gets more size at the point of attack which is a must to be at the top level in the MVFC, plus you have flexiability on the next level.  The trick is getting the right body types.  Looking forward to seeing how the defense transitions.  Does anyone else run this defense in the MVFC as a base?

  • Upvote 1
Posted
8 hours ago, F'n Hawks said:

I’m guessing we will hear coaching staff announcements starting to come in this week and next. I’m excited to hear who he will be bringing in.

Based on the timeline he gave, we should be finding names out today. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, UNDBIZ said:

Well..... that's more holdover from the old staff than I was expecting.

 

4 minutes ago, gfhockey said:

Agreed

Yes, but I am guessing that is it.  Otherwise, they would have been announced at the same time.  At least only 1 is defense.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
11 hours ago, FSSD said:

I really like the idea of 4-2-5 - it gets more size at the point of attack which is a must to be at the top level in the MVFC, plus you have flexiability on the next level.  The trick is getting the right body types.  Looking forward to seeing how the defense transitions.  Does anyone else run this defense in the MVFC as a base?

I would have to watch some film on other teams, but I believe it has been a base D for NDSU for a number of years.

Posted
19 minutes ago, sioux24/7 said:

I would say that’s almost 100% of who I and a lot were expecting to be retained. Stepps is the one I was surprised by. 

OC probably got some say on who he wanted to keep around to help with the offense.
Kostich isn't a surprise, despite some opinions, he's a good ST coordinator and is well liked by players, parents and high school coaches, plus has a ton of connections. Adding nickelbacks to his plate will take that off of Stepps, who will just handle CB's.
Still need a safeties coach in the secondary, plus Edge, LB's and DL.

  • Upvote 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...