forksandspoons Posted December 10 Posted December 10 12 minutes ago, Devils said: Who are FBS drop downs that have helped us the past, say, 5 years? I can't hardly think of any. Because they haven’t brought in that many. James Johannesson, McNaboe, Jeff Griffen are a few I can think of. They’ve had good luck with FCS guys (Hoosman, Buckner) but last year went away with going after FBS and FCS guys for the most part Quote
Popular Post geaux_sioux Posted December 10 Popular Post Posted December 10 12 minutes ago, Devils said: Who are FBS drop downs that have helped us the past, say, 5 years? I can't hardly think of any. It’s a good time to start a new precedent. Plus there will be a tidal wave of FBS guys coming down. The timing of new coach from FBS and new facilities is perfect. 9 Quote
geaux_sioux Posted December 10 Posted December 10 3 minutes ago, forksandspoons said: Because they haven’t brought in that many. James Johannesson, McNaboe, Jeff Griffen are a few I can think of. They’ve had good luck with FCS guys (Hoosman, Buckner) but last year went away with going after FBS and FCS guys for the most part Alex Tillman, Hinojosa lol, that one Kansas LB, Braden Hanson. Quote
forksandspoons Posted December 10 Posted December 10 3 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said: Alex Tillman, Hinojosa lol, that one Kansas LB, Braden Hanson. I was trying to think of the past 5 years haha those are some good ones! And Clive Georges 1 Quote
Sioux94 Posted December 10 Posted December 10 2 hours ago, forksandspoons said: I was trying to think of the past 5 years haha those are some good ones! And Clive Georges I think there was an O lineman 5-6 ago, was Coe his last name, something like that? 1 Quote
geaux_sioux Posted December 10 Posted December 10 11 minutes ago, Sioux94 said: I think there was an O lineman 5-6 ago, was Coe his last name, something like that? Not FBS though. Thought he was D2? Quote
Hambone Posted December 10 Posted December 10 54 minutes ago, geaux_sioux said: Not FBS though. Thought he was D2? Correct - Western New Mexico if I remember right. Quote
gundy1124 Posted December 10 Posted December 10 8 minutes ago, Hambone said: Correct - Western New Mexico if I remember right. Cup of Coffee with the Cowboys. I recall a conversation from Luke at that time. "he's the only starter we have that can actually move someone" https://wnmumustangs.com/news/2017/5/1/former-mustang-football-player-coe-signs-with-dallas-cowboys.aspx Quote
Kab Posted December 10 Posted December 10 Listened to an interview with the running back coming from Minot next year. they asked him what he was looking forward to next year. his answer was WINNING 1 Quote
F'n Hawks Posted December 10 Author Posted December 10 7 minutes ago, Kab said: Listened to an interview with the running back coming from Minot next year. they asked him what he was looking forward to next year. his answer was WINNING Sounds like a JYD to me. 3 Quote
Sioux94 Posted December 10 Posted December 10 2 hours ago, Kab said: Listened to an interview with the running back coming from Minot next year. they asked him what he was looking forward to next year. his answer was WINNING You gotta think this coaching change will invigorate the guys who stay and truly get them excited about next year. I'm sure many of the players felt pretty close to how we all felt at the end of this season. 1 Quote
zonadub Posted December 11 Posted December 11 Now it sucks that we don’t get UND football for 9 months. Hopeful. 2 Quote
nodak651 Posted Thursday at 07:57 PM Posted Thursday at 07:57 PM Curious to see how the House settlement will affect player rosters in the FCS. NDSU has near 130 on their roster and UND is pretty close to 105 which will be the new ncaa limit. If NDSU decides to offer additional scholarships or if they decide to distribute NIL money directly, they will have to reduce their roster to 105. If UND does that, they are already near the 105 limit with the current number of walk ons. In 22-23, SDSU also had more participants, at 116. UND was 108. I think the huge difference in walkons has been one of the reasons NDSU has had so much depth, is always able to reload so easily, and it's also a reason they have had so much late season success relative to UND which has historically gotten worse at the end of most seasons. This will be something to watch moving forward imo. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted Thursday at 08:10 PM Posted Thursday at 08:10 PM Does the 105 cap apply to FCS? I get conflicting answers. Quote
UND-FB-FAN Posted Thursday at 08:24 PM Posted Thursday at 08:24 PM 12 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: Does the 105 cap apply to FCS? I get conflicting answers. The way I understand it is schools and conferences in the FCS can opt out of the new model if they choose not to share revenue with athletes. If sharing revenue, then 105 limit also applies to FCS school. Quote
nodak651 Posted Thursday at 08:31 PM Posted Thursday at 08:31 PM 8 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said: The way I understand it is schools and conferences in the FCS can opt out of the new model if they choose not to share revenue with athletes. If sharing revenue, then 105 limit also applies to FCS school. Agreed. Also, if a school shares revenue for one sport, all sports effectively are opted in and must follow the roster limits. Basically, NDSU either has to choose to not pay out any additional money or they have to massively reduce the roster size (by like 24). With UND already being near 105, UND would potentially have more flexibility, especially if hockey ends up sharing revenue, because they could potentially decide to pay a few difference makers with less of a negative tradeoff from the application of a reduced FB roster limit. Quote
nodak651 Posted Thursday at 08:37 PM Posted Thursday at 08:37 PM NCAA's Updated Question and Answer: Impact of the Proposed Settlement on Division I Institutions Quote
The Sicatoka Posted Thursday at 08:39 PM Posted Thursday at 08:39 PM How do you share revenues when most schools are heavily self-subsidized? Is that subject to sharing? Quote
The Sicatoka Posted Thursday at 08:50 PM Posted Thursday at 08:50 PM 12 minutes ago, nodak651 said: NCAA's Updated Question and Answer: Impact of the Proposed Settlement on Division I Institutions A document only a lawyer could love. Quote
nodak651 Posted Thursday at 08:52 PM Posted Thursday at 08:52 PM https://ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com/governance/d1/legislation/2024-25/Dec2024D1Gov_PhaseTwoInstSetQuestionandAnswer.pdf 24 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: How do you share revenues when most schools are heavily self-subsidized? Is that subject to sharing? Think of it more like pay to play rather than revenue sharing. The money can come from anywhere. Increasing scholarships can count as "revenue sharing". It could be "subsidy sharing" if a school chooses. Quote
nodak651 Posted Thursday at 09:03 PM Posted Thursday at 09:03 PM 13 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: A document only a lawyer could love. The actual settlement is even more interesting lol https://ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com/ncaa/legal/NCAALEG_Settlement-July2024.pdf Quote
The Sicatoka Posted Thursday at 09:27 PM Posted Thursday at 09:27 PM 23 minutes ago, nodak651 said: The actual settlement is even more interesting lol https://ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com/ncaa/legal/NCAALEG_Settlement-July2024.pdf Anyone know how to make my eyes stop bleeding? 1 Quote
NDRA Posted Thursday at 09:47 PM Posted Thursday at 09:47 PM 19 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said: Anyone know how to make my eyes stop bleeding? Take a Bubba nap... Quote
shep Posted Friday at 12:57 AM Posted Friday at 12:57 AM 4 hours ago, The Sicatoka said: A document only a lawyer could love. I won’t even look at it until I’m paid. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.