Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

If Berry somehow hangs onto his job, KG has to go. Subpar recruiting and suspect goalie play over last few years. Prior to Simpson, also the  d coach, which is another story. I also question paying Simpson $100k/year  with zero coaching experience.  My eyes see a young guy with playing experience, maybe having a tough time communicating the coaching side. 
 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, BusinessSoot said:

If Berry somehow hangs onto his job, KG has to go. Subpar recruiting and suspect goalie play over last few years. Prior to Simpson, also the  d coach, which is another story. I also question paying Simpson $100k/year  with zero coaching experience.  My eyes see a young guy with playing experience, maybe having a tough time communicating the coaching side. 
 

 

You don’t know what you have with Simpson. Too small of a sample size. KG has enough time in the saddle to send packing unfortunately. Sad to see. Just hasn’t worked out.

Posted
1 minute ago, 90siouxfan said:

Why is Dane Jackson not the recipient of any questions or allegations, he seems invisible. 

He was fine under the last coach. He’s the one I’m torn on. Not sure how much of Berry’s failures you pin on him. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, 90siouxfan said:

Why is Dane Jackson not the recipient of any questions or allegations, he seems invisible. 

I believe his hands are tied due to his boss not allowing him try different things/give input.
My guess is kids would respond better to Jackson at this point if he was in charge.

Hak and him were very good together. Makes a guy wonder.

Posted
2 minutes ago, BusinessSoot said:

I believe his hands are tied due to his boss not allowing him try different things/give input.
My guess is kids would respond better to Jackson at this point if he was in charge.

Hak and him were very good together. Makes a guy wonder.

Speculation only at this point.

Posted

A lot of what's happening this year from a coaching / roster management perspective is the same old. A handful of guys that seem to be immune of repercussions for their play. That's not new. I never before though questioned the effort of those guys. Let's use Schmaltz as an example last year, played a Top 6 role for half the year, Top 9 basically until playoffs. Power play time. Couldn't score. He always gave effort though. I could be frustrated for some guy's roles given their production, but they tried. 

This year it feels different. The consistent effort doesn't seem to be there for some guys who are wearing letters. It's not just Kunz, but there was a real opportunity I felt for Berry to sit him on Saturday. Not only was that penalty completely lazy and cost them on Friday, but he's also looked disinterested for weeks. 

Since there's zero foresight from the athletic department, if this team rallies this year or wins the conference championship, Berry will get extended. I still think it's a real possibility that if they miss the tournament, he's gone. Using the word feel again. It does feel like unless something drastic happens, that this program is in a bad spot. I never before thought that somebody would transfer from this program that wasn't playing time related. Miss the NCAAs, plus Berry stays. Could we see some key players enter? I think it's possible. 

Berry needs to figure things out, quickly. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Posted

When the student section starts the chant at the end of the game Saturday using the first two words in this thread title you know the natives are getting restless.

  • Upvote 2
Posted

I do not have an opinion whatsoever on the hiring/firing of coaches.  I do have an opinion however as to the product we are seeing on the ice, and the changes that are happening in college hockey.  Let's pivot away from Brad for a second and think about our other distinguished alumni coach over in Duluth.  Look at Isaac Howard.  Kid goes to Duluth a first rounder from the program.  Absolute Blue Chipper.  He has a less than average season playing for Sandy.  Then he transfers to Michigan State and is crushing college hockey on the #1 team in the country.  I am really thinking that whomever posted it was onto something...its a new era of coaching style that will be successful.  

  • Upvote 4
Posted
1 hour ago, yzerman19 said:

I do not have an opinion whatsoever on the hiring/firing of coaches.  I do have an opinion however as to the product we are seeing on the ice, and the changes that are happening in college hockey.  Let's pivot away from Brad for a second and think about our other distinguished alumni coach over in Duluth.  Look at Isaac Howard.  Kid goes to Duluth a first rounder from the program.  Absolute Blue Chipper.  He has a less than average season playing for Sandy.  Then he transfers to Michigan State and is crushing college hockey on the #1 team in the country.  I am really thinking that whomever posted it was onto something...its a new era of coaching style that will be successful.  

Fohr it is!

Posted

Is it just me, or do others also feel it's a possibility that key players start to look to the portal? Two examples.

McLaughlin - @Oxbow6 has been beating this drum. Why I could see it is personal development. It's clear playing wing does not match up with his skill set. Everyone seems to notice this, except for the coaches. There were concerns about this strength and faceoff win % at the end of last year. How about the coaches practice / coach / develop those parts of this game? They had all off-season to work on it.

Boisvert - Ultimate competitor. Does he feel this is an unserious program? Lack of accountability that the coaches hold to some players. 

If Berry is extended, will key players leave? Who knows. I could be completely off. I would have never thought in previous seasons that was a possibility. Wouldn't say the there's a zero percent chance after what we've seen this year. For every program, in every sport, there seems to be a turning point. Where you feel the direction of the program is cemented. We're close, Berry has two months to change it. 

Posted
34 minutes ago, AJS said:

Is it just me, or do others also feel it's a possibility that key players start to look to the portal? Two examples.

McLaughlin - @Oxbow6 has been beating this drum. Why I could see it is personal development. It's clear playing wing does not match up with his skill set. Everyone seems to notice this, except for the coaches. There were concerns about this strength and faceoff win % at the end of last year. How about the coaches practice / coach / develop those parts of this game? They had all off-season to work on it.

Boisvert - Ultimate competitor. Does he feel this is an unserious program? Lack of accountability that the coaches hold to some players. 

If Berry is extended, will key players leave? Who knows. I could be completely off. I would have never thought in previous seasons that was a possibility. Wouldn't say the there's a zero percent chance after what we've seen this year. For every program, in every sport, there seems to be a turning point. Where you feel the direction of the program is cemented. We're close, Berry has two months to change it. 

You are correct but the operate word here is Change.  Berry has shown us no indicating that he is capable and/or willing to change anything.

Posted
On 1/18/2025 at 6:33 AM, yzerman19 said:

Gavin McKenna is the other.  

It is extremely difficult to enter the NHL as an 18 year old and have success.  Many, many, many players including first round NHL picks in the CHL like the idea of being on a college campus for one year, maybe two, then turning pro in order to be impactful as rookies.  

Regarding the money, the only "real" money that is guaranteed is your signing bonus of ~$300k (which will still be there if you play a year of NCAA hockey) so the compensation you are needing to match is $80k in the AHL roughly?  But you then also have to pay for an apartment and incidentals and be a full on adult if you are in the AHL.  CHL money (non-endorsement) is beer and gas money.  It isn't anything to compete with.  

I agree with the fact that hockey is not football or basketball, but the NIL is starting to enter.  The hottest blue chip players are weighing the big 4 of:

1. Will they develop me for the NHL

2.  How much is my total package (scholarship plus NIL)

3.  Is this a place I want to spend time walking around and be a part of the campus community

4. Do I like the boys/coach/program/facilities and can we win a chip

Based on those 4 things, I believe that coaching and recruiting is changing.  One might say we don't want pima donna recruits that think like that, but Gen Z is coming whether we like it or not.  It used to be #4 drove the bus...

that

Posted
On 1/21/2025 at 9:14 AM, Irish said:

You are correct but the operate word here is Change.  Berry has shown us no indicating that he is capable and/or willing to change anything.

Matt Shaw was shown the door very quickly after a downturn. Not sure why we can't hold Berry, Dane, Karl and Dillion accountable.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Too bad we didn't get Herter then. 

Honestly, I don't think Herter would be able to solve the problem that Berry has created.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...