Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

UND @ Purple Cows


stoneySIOUX

Recommended Posts

So I paid the $25 and got to watch UND stink for 2 periods, and then the feed cut and I missed the comeback (because I paused and left for a while).   Arrrgggh!

Not pleasant to watch those first 2 periods.  Not much jump or hitting, losing puck battles, looking disorganized.  

Three goals in the third is encouraging, though.  A comeback on the road in a place where they have not won in a lot of years - I'll take it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tnt said:

That’s the thing though, they don’t hold themselves to the same standard in daily life that they hold a college student playing a game!

Speak for yourself. I’ve got my !@#$ together. This program is held to a standard. You’d be just fine with losing yours. Kick rocks.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SiouxFanSince1990 said:

Speak for yourself. I’ve got my !@#$ together. This program is held to a standard. You’d be just fine with losing yours. Kick rocks.

It's OK to have sensitive spots.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, brianvf said:

Hopefully Zmolek can play tomorrow.

Will we see Hobie get the start for the second game?

Hobie deserves a start. If TJ would have been lights out then the choice would be clearly to stick with him. TJ was good, not spectacular, so let’s get our recruit some reps. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brucesky02 said:

What a gift for us on the line change by MSU. There would be a lot of angry posts on here if that was us. Go Sioux.

The player who comes on the ice for the -1 turns and looks at the bench right after the goal. While their team and fans probably blame the refs, to paraphrase the legendary Gunnar Stahl, they lost it for themselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the tables were turned, would we UND fans feel the same way as this guy? I don’t know, after reviewing the hit, it seemed like a legit penalty call to me, and it was made by CCHA officials so I give them credit for calling it. 

IMG_2886.png

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn’t watch the game. Can someone explain the sequence of events that led to both the major penalty AND the goal being disallowed? I can’t quite wrap my head around how one thing led to another or were somehow related. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Godsmack said:

If the tables were turned, would we UND fans feel the same way as this guy? I don’t know, after reviewing the hit, it seemed like a legit penalty call to me, and it was made by CCHA officials so I give them credit for calling it. 

IMG_2886.png

Can be mad at the rule. Not sure how you argue the call

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Godsmack said:

I didn’t watch the game. Can someone explain the sequence of events that led to both the major penalty AND the goal being disallowed? I can’t quite wrap my head around how one thing led to another or were somehow related. 

We have a guy up in the press box whose job is to look out for things to be challenged. Like a missed major penalty or offsides on a goal. He noticed it and called down to the bench to get berry to challenge the play for a major.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nodakgirl93 said:

We have a guy up in the press box whose job is to look out for things to be challenged. Like a missed major penalty or offsides on a goal. He noticed it and called down to the bench to get berry to challenge the play for a major.

Gotcha. So the infraction must’ve happened uncalled, Mankato somehow gains possession of the puck and scores and then Berry challenges the missed call. Right on. Thanks!

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Godsmack said:

If the tables were turned, would we UND fans feel the same way as this guy? I don’t know, after reviewing the hit, it seemed like a legit penalty call to me, and it was made by CCHA officials so I give them credit for calling it. 

IMG_2886.png

I'd be mad at our player for using an elbow at the end of an unnecessary hit. Reminded me of Cooley losing the NC game for the Gophers, never give the refs a chance to influence the game.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Godsmack said:

Gotcha. So the infraction must’ve happened uncalled, Mankato somehow gains possession of the puck and scores and then Berry challenges the missed call. Right on. Thanks!

Yeah i think the missed major happened about 1 minute before the goal was scored. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, nodakgirl93 said:

Yeah i think the missed major happened about 1 minute before the goal was scored. 

Yep, you’re absolutely right. UND would’ve challenged regardless, they just needed a stoppage of play to challenge the missed infraction, even if Mankato hadn’t have scored. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...