Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

UND @ Purple Cows


stoneySIOUX

Recommended Posts

I didn’t watch the game. Can someone explain the sequence of events that led to both the major penalty AND the goal being disallowed? I can’t quite wrap my head around how one thing led to another or were somehow related. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Godsmack said:

If the tables were turned, would we UND fans feel the same way as this guy? I don’t know, after reviewing the hit, it seemed like a legit penalty call to me, and it was made by CCHA officials so I give them credit for calling it. 

IMG_2886.png

Can be mad at the rule. Not sure how you argue the call

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Godsmack said:

I didn’t watch the game. Can someone explain the sequence of events that led to both the major penalty AND the goal being disallowed? I can’t quite wrap my head around how one thing led to another or were somehow related. 

We have a guy up in the press box whose job is to look out for things to be challenged. Like a missed major penalty or offsides on a goal. He noticed it and called down to the bench to get berry to challenge the play for a major.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nodakgirl93 said:

We have a guy up in the press box whose job is to look out for things to be challenged. Like a missed major penalty or offsides on a goal. He noticed it and called down to the bench to get berry to challenge the play for a major.

Gotcha. So the infraction must’ve happened uncalled, Mankato somehow gains possession of the puck and scores and then Berry challenges the missed call. Right on. Thanks!

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Godsmack said:

If the tables were turned, would we UND fans feel the same way as this guy? I don’t know, after reviewing the hit, it seemed like a legit penalty call to me, and it was made by CCHA officials so I give them credit for calling it. 

IMG_2886.png

I'd be mad at our player for using an elbow at the end of an unnecessary hit. Reminded me of Cooley losing the NC game for the Gophers, never give the refs a chance to influence the game.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Godsmack said:

Gotcha. So the infraction must’ve happened uncalled, Mankato somehow gains possession of the puck and scores and then Berry challenges the missed call. Right on. Thanks!

Yeah i think the missed major happened about 1 minute before the goal was scored. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, nodakgirl93 said:

Yeah i think the missed major happened about 1 minute before the goal was scored. 

Yep, you’re absolutely right. UND would’ve challenged regardless, they just needed a stoppage of play to challenge the missed infraction, even if Mankato hadn’t have scored. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Godsmack said:

If the tables were turned, would we UND fans feel the same way as this guy? I don’t know, after reviewing the hit, it seemed like a legit penalty call to me, and it was made by CCHA officials so I give them credit for calling it. 

IMG_2886.png

The Right call was absolutely mad, but I've be made as the penalty didn't contribute to the goal being scored.  Having a goal disallowed and receiving a 5 minute major totally turned the momentum.  If the Ref makes the call right away when it happens it wouldn't hurt MSUM as much.  With the Ref missing the Call, there is no other way to call it.

I laugh at the MSUM blaming the Ref for the game.  The Ref actually tried to help by missing the call, it was only after UND challenged the call that they had not choice, but to make the call.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, petey23 said:

Can't even imagine what the Michigan board looked like a couple of weeks ago when Minnesota State went into Yost and dumped the Wolverines.

 

giphy.gif

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Big Green said:

The Right call was absolutely mad, but I've be made as the penalty didn't contribute to the goal being scored.  Having a goal disallowed and receiving a 5 minute major totally turned the momentum.  If the Ref makes the call right away when it happens it wouldn't hurt MSUM as much.  With the Ref missing the Call, there is no other way to call it.

I laugh at the MSUM blaming the Ref for the game.  The Ref actually tried to help by missing the call, it was only after UND challenged the call that they had not choice, but to make the call.

 

 

They also reset the clock to the time of the infraction. So the goal actually never happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Godsmack said:

I didn’t watch the game. Can someone explain the sequence of events that led to both the major penalty AND the goal being disallowed? I can’t quite wrap my head around how one thing led to another or were somehow related. 

Mankato 15 took a draw against Boisvert and the beginning of that shift - Boisvert took exception to 15 being a bit too frisky on the draw setup and pushed 15 back gently, glove to helmet.  They reset, puck was dropped, hit occurred, then a bit later #3 was ‘scored’.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...