NDRA Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago I think the genius, that decided a coach with a .500 winning percentage was right guy to lead the program into the future, he should be the one to cover the Xtra cash needed 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND Football Fan Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago When Bubba left Duluth they won Natty, hopefully history repeats when or if he does step down. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND-FB-FAN Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago 1 hour ago, jdub27 said: Who's sugar coating the current results, particularly the last two weeks? I haven't seen anyone defending it. I acknowledged and agreed with a lot of what you said. The criticism is warranted and valid. I'm also understanding there currently isn't 7 figures lying around right now to make the fix you are advocating for. Unless that shows up somewhere, there won't be an immediate change. Call me crazy, but all the criticisms in the world aren't going to convince a sane person to walk away from well over half a million dollars doing something they are passionate about, barring something completely unforeseen, so that isn't a solution. Find me anyone on here who would make that choice. So why were these unwarranted head coach extensions put into place? You’re using a problem (buy out cost) to justify a problem (unwarranted extensions-need a different HC); you realize that, right? Two wrongs don’t make a right. If UND can fund new multimillion dollar facilities, they can campaign to acquire buy out funds for an unwarranted extension and an ineffective coaching staff. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawn-O Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago 9 hours ago, jdub27 said: University President's are the ones who are involved in these major decisions, not athletic directors. I would argue you aren't paying attention all that well if you don't think that the President and his second in charge aren't huge proponents of supporting athletics and understanding the "front porch theory" on why they are important. That being said, I have no clue what their stance is other than they see a huge importance of making sure we are aligned with our regional peers. Obviously none of that matters if a conference isn't interested. But, it probably doesn't hurt for University Presidents to have high-up connections to members of potential conferences you may be interested in though, at least have conversations. Kupchella really screwed us on this one. Worse than Faison hiring Kyle, I’d argue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.