Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said:

Heil seems to be have playing well lately so that's encouraging at least but you goalies are always weird.

FYP

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Before yesterday's MI & WI game, MI's PWR was 8 & WI's was 32. After WI's win they jumped up to 27, while MI fell only 1 spot to 9. Can anyone explain how MI got shutout on home ice to the #32 team & only fell 1 spot? I thought bad losses hurt a team's PWR. Whereas UND loses to BSU & had a major drop as a result; not so with MI.

Posted
10 minutes ago, .357 said:

Before yesterday's MI & WI game, MI's PWR was 8 & WI's was 32. After WI's win they jumped up to 27, while MI fell only 1 spot to 9. Can anyone explain how MI got shutout on home ice to the #32 team & only fell 1 spot? I thought bad losses hurt a team's PWR. Whereas UND loses to BSU & had a major drop as a result; not so with MI.

Look at Northeastern beating BC

Posted
1 hour ago, brianvf said:

There’s still a chance that Heil plays another year of juniors too. 
If the coaches think that Hobie can take the reins, then maybe Hobie/Heil/Huson.

If not, I’m guessing they delay Heil and it would be Portal/Hobie/Huson. 

I would guess you could replace Portal with CHL. Remember the number of available goalies increased exponentially more so than just the Portal now. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, cberkas said:

Look at Northeastern beating BC

That doesn't answer my question, which was why MI wasn't penalized more for losing at home to a #32 team, whereas UND was affected quite a bit after their L & tie with BSU.

Posted
2 minutes ago, .357 said:

That doesn't answer my question, which was why MI wasn't penalized more for losing at home to a #32 team, whereas UND was affected quite a bit after their L & tie with BSU.

BC stayed 1 and Northeastern with two wins jumped up to 28 from 46

Posted
7 minutes ago, cberkas said:

BC stayed 1 and Northeastern with two wins jumped up to 28 from 46

So why aren't these bad losses affecting teams like MI & BC very much, if at all? Compared to UND's drop.

Posted
20 minutes ago, .357 said:

That doesn't answer my question, which was why MI wasn't penalized more for losing at home to a #32 team, whereas UND was affected quite a bit after their L & tie with BSU.

You’re assuming every team is equally spaced 1-64 and that’s not the case

  • Upvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, .357 said:

Before yesterday's MI & WI game, MI's PWR was 8 & WI's was 32. After WI's win they jumped up to 27, while MI fell only 1 spot to 9. Can anyone explain how MI got shutout on home ice to the #32 team & only fell 1 spot? I thought bad losses hurt a team's PWR. Whereas UND loses to BSU & had a major drop as a result; not so with MI.

Pairwise seems a bit whacky this season. Look at NE and UND. 

Posted
2 hours ago, .357 said:

Before yesterday's MI & WI game, MI's PWR was 8 & WI's was 32. After WI's win they jumped up to 27, while MI fell only 1 spot to 9. Can anyone explain how MI got shutout on home ice to the #32 team & only fell 1 spot? I thought bad losses hurt a team's PWR. Whereas UND loses to BSU & had a major drop as a result; not so with MI.

Because the pairwise still has less than half the meaningful data loaded to analyze.

Posted

After the Manitoba exhibition, it's off to ASU (19 pairwise), then Western (5 pairwise) at home.  Then we go to Stearns County for the rematch with the Clowns.  Wonder if Geno Parrish is still working the broadcast for St Cloud.:huh:

Posted
6 minutes ago, Blackheart said:

After the Manitoba exhibition, it's off to ASU (19 pairwise), then Western (5 pairwise) at home.  Then we go to Stearns County for the rematch with the Clowns.  Wonder if Geno Parrish is still working the broadcast for St Cloud.:huh:

Yep, and still as cringeworthy!

Posted
5 hours ago, .357 said:

So why aren't these bad losses affecting teams like MI & BC very much, if at all? Compared to UND's drop.

Getting swept by Cornell and a loss/tie to bemidji are going to continue harming us. It’s going to take a lot more than a home sweep (I guess 1  and 2/3 wins) to level us off due to bemidji and Cornell being less than stellar lately. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, hockeytherapy13 said:

Getting swept by Cornell and a loss/tie to bemidji are going to continue harming us. It’s going to take a lot more than a home sweep (I guess 1  and 2/3 wins) to level us off due to bemidji and Cornell being less than stellar lately. 

Cornell's too talented & experienced to continue being mediocre. Anticipating that they'll put together some key wins in the second half to bolster our PWR if even just a little. Bemidji, on the other hand, pfft...

  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...