Kevin G Posted Saturday at 09:30 PM Posted Saturday at 09:30 PM 24 minutes ago, InHeavenThereIsNoBeer said: Heil seems to be have playing well lately so that's encouraging at least but you goalies are always weird. FYP 1 Quote
.357 Posted Saturday at 09:50 PM Posted Saturday at 09:50 PM Before yesterday's MI & WI game, MI's PWR was 8 & WI's was 32. After WI's win they jumped up to 27, while MI fell only 1 spot to 9. Can anyone explain how MI got shutout on home ice to the #32 team & only fell 1 spot? I thought bad losses hurt a team's PWR. Whereas UND loses to BSU & had a major drop as a result; not so with MI. Quote
cberkas Posted Saturday at 10:01 PM Posted Saturday at 10:01 PM 10 minutes ago, .357 said: Before yesterday's MI & WI game, MI's PWR was 8 & WI's was 32. After WI's win they jumped up to 27, while MI fell only 1 spot to 9. Can anyone explain how MI got shutout on home ice to the #32 team & only fell 1 spot? I thought bad losses hurt a team's PWR. Whereas UND loses to BSU & had a major drop as a result; not so with MI. Look at Northeastern beating BC Quote
I Ranger Posted Saturday at 10:07 PM Posted Saturday at 10:07 PM 1 hour ago, brianvf said: There’s still a chance that Heil plays another year of juniors too. If the coaches think that Hobie can take the reins, then maybe Hobie/Heil/Huson. If not, I’m guessing they delay Heil and it would be Portal/Hobie/Huson. I would guess you could replace Portal with CHL. Remember the number of available goalies increased exponentially more so than just the Portal now. 1 Quote
.357 Posted Saturday at 10:24 PM Posted Saturday at 10:24 PM 19 minutes ago, cberkas said: Look at Northeastern beating BC That doesn't answer my question, which was why MI wasn't penalized more for losing at home to a #32 team, whereas UND was affected quite a bit after their L & tie with BSU. Quote
cberkas Posted Saturday at 10:36 PM Posted Saturday at 10:36 PM 2 minutes ago, .357 said: That doesn't answer my question, which was why MI wasn't penalized more for losing at home to a #32 team, whereas UND was affected quite a bit after their L & tie with BSU. BC stayed 1 and Northeastern with two wins jumped up to 28 from 46 Quote
InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted Saturday at 10:45 PM Posted Saturday at 10:45 PM 1 hour ago, Kevin G said: FYP Every time I get excited about a goalie recruit I remember Matej Tomek 4 Quote
.357 Posted Saturday at 10:45 PM Posted Saturday at 10:45 PM 7 minutes ago, cberkas said: BC stayed 1 and Northeastern with two wins jumped up to 28 from 46 So why aren't these bad losses affecting teams like MI & BC very much, if at all? Compared to UND's drop. Quote
InHeavenThereIsNoBeer Posted Saturday at 10:45 PM Posted Saturday at 10:45 PM 20 minutes ago, .357 said: That doesn't answer my question, which was why MI wasn't penalized more for losing at home to a #32 team, whereas UND was affected quite a bit after their L & tie with BSU. You’re assuming every team is equally spaced 1-64 and that’s not the case 1 Quote
LuvHockey Posted Saturday at 11:14 PM Posted Saturday at 11:14 PM Not that it helps UND….but after last night Denver is 1-4 in last 5 games since beating us ….. Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted Saturday at 11:37 PM Posted Saturday at 11:37 PM I wonder how much higher our goals per game average would be if all those missed shots were on goal. Quote
siouxfaninseattle Posted Saturday at 11:41 PM Posted Saturday at 11:41 PM 1 hour ago, .357 said: Before yesterday's MI & WI game, MI's PWR was 8 & WI's was 32. After WI's win they jumped up to 27, while MI fell only 1 spot to 9. Can anyone explain how MI got shutout on home ice to the #32 team & only fell 1 spot? I thought bad losses hurt a team's PWR. Whereas UND loses to BSU & had a major drop as a result; not so with MI. Pairwise seems a bit whacky this season. Look at NE and UND. Quote
petey23 Posted Saturday at 11:57 PM Posted Saturday at 11:57 PM 2 hours ago, .357 said: Before yesterday's MI & WI game, MI's PWR was 8 & WI's was 32. After WI's win they jumped up to 27, while MI fell only 1 spot to 9. Can anyone explain how MI got shutout on home ice to the #32 team & only fell 1 spot? I thought bad losses hurt a team's PWR. Whereas UND loses to BSU & had a major drop as a result; not so with MI. Because the pairwise still has less than half the meaningful data loaded to analyze. Quote
The Sicatoka Posted Sunday at 12:48 AM Posted Sunday at 12:48 AM 2 hours ago, .357 said: That doesn't answer my question, which was why MI wasn't penalized more for losing at home to a #32 team, whereas UND was affected quite a bit after their L & tie with BSU. Study this and get back to me. It is the statistical basis of PWR. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley–Terry_model 1 Quote
fightingsioux4life Posted Sunday at 03:58 AM Posted Sunday at 03:58 AM 56 minutes ago, SiouxFan100 said: Now what? We get healed up during the break and come back at (close to) full strength. Then we build momentum into March. 2 Quote
Blackheart Posted Sunday at 04:16 AM Posted Sunday at 04:16 AM After the Manitoba exhibition, it's off to ASU (19 pairwise), then Western (5 pairwise) at home. Then we go to Stearns County for the rematch with the Clowns. Wonder if Geno Parrish is still working the broadcast for St Cloud. Quote
tnt Posted Sunday at 04:23 AM Posted Sunday at 04:23 AM 6 minutes ago, Blackheart said: After the Manitoba exhibition, it's off to ASU (19 pairwise), then Western (5 pairwise) at home. Then we go to Stearns County for the rematch with the Clowns. Wonder if Geno Parrish is still working the broadcast for St Cloud. Yep, and still as cringeworthy! Quote
hockeytherapy13 Posted Sunday at 04:30 AM Posted Sunday at 04:30 AM 5 hours ago, .357 said: So why aren't these bad losses affecting teams like MI & BC very much, if at all? Compared to UND's drop. Getting swept by Cornell and a loss/tie to bemidji are going to continue harming us. It’s going to take a lot more than a home sweep (I guess 1 and 2/3 wins) to level us off due to bemidji and Cornell being less than stellar lately. Quote
.357 Posted Sunday at 04:46 AM Posted Sunday at 04:46 AM 8 minutes ago, hockeytherapy13 said: Getting swept by Cornell and a loss/tie to bemidji are going to continue harming us. It’s going to take a lot more than a home sweep (I guess 1 and 2/3 wins) to level us off due to bemidji and Cornell being less than stellar lately. Cornell's too talented & experienced to continue being mediocre. Anticipating that they'll put together some key wins in the second half to bolster our PWR if even just a little. Bemidji, on the other hand, pfft... 1 Quote
hockeytherapy13 Posted Sunday at 04:46 AM Posted Sunday at 04:46 AM 22 minutes ago, tnt said: Yep, and still as cringeworthy! If you can believe it, I think Geno might even be getting worse… Quote
siouxweet Posted Sunday at 04:57 AM Posted Sunday at 04:57 AM 21 minutes ago, Wilbur said: 22nd in the PWR. Thanks Denver. About 10 more spots to climb. Quote
brianvf Posted Sunday at 05:00 AM Posted Sunday at 05:00 AM 3 minutes ago, siouxweet said: About 10 more spots to climb. A win or two over WMU in Jan would do wonders. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.