Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Big Green said:

Can we hang a banner for this?  

We were probably the best team in 2020.  Cornell would have something to say about that.  According the the people doing the polls we were not.

An no he has not build a championship team.  He had a championship team handed to him.  Unless we are talking Conference championships (who cares)

The is is so correct 

Posted
1 minute ago, Big Green said:

Can we hang a banner for this?  

We were probably the best team in 2020.  Cornell would have something to say about that.  According the the people doing the polls we were not.

An no he has not build a championship team.  He had a championship team handed to him.  Unless we are talking Conference championships (who cares)

Wow! 

Posted
31 minutes ago, brianvf said:

All my post illustrated is that Berry can, and has, built multiple championship level teams.  But anything can happen once the players hit the ice.
Like if Michigan doesn't win the title this year...they certainly built a championship team, but they may not win it.

Either way, no worries.  If you want him fired for failing to win a title when COVID killed the postseason...or if you want him fired for not winning a 5OT regional final game...or if you want him fired while his team is currently leading the toughest league and in position for making the postseason again...then so be it. 

Maybe having a bunch of freshmen in important roles would have something to do with not winning a title?

  • Upvote 3
Posted
1 hour ago, gfhockey said:

When’s the last major recruiting battle we won against a blue blood meaning minnesota the Boston’s michigan

Do you want me to go through the current pipeline, because I can if you need me to.

Posted
2 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said:

Do you want me to go through the current pipeline, because I can if you need me to.

Please which ones we beat out Michigan. Minnesota the Boston’s 

Posted
6 minutes ago, gfhockey said:

Please which ones we beat out Michigan. Minnesota the Boston’s 

Any of the current '05 recruits would be your answer.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, AJS said:

Any of the current '05 recruits would be your answer.

Thank you.

 

2 minutes ago, gfhockey said:

I never saw them mention the other teams? Lot of umd wmu uno etc

Perron, Jackson 100% got recruited from Minnesota and Michigan. 

Posted

This is such a dumb argument. You can absolutely have the opinion that Bubbs should be fired, but it's 1) not happening any time soon and 2) not founded in anything but being butthurt about a team that is currently leading the NCHC.

  • Upvote 3
Posted
48 minutes ago, stoneySIOUX said:

Thank you.

 

Perron, Jackson 100% got recruited from Minnesota and Michigan. 

Jackson Blake?  If Brad Berry can't win battles for legacy recruits, then maybe he should be canned.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Benny Baker said:

Jackson Blake?  If Brad Berry can't win battles for legacy recruits, then maybe he should be canned.

Ok, so, we have qualifiers now... Cool. How about Perron?

Posted

At this point the fire Berry discussion is way premature. And to add a little something to think about - this is a team with 14 new players (no, not all freshman) and you don't turn over half the team and perform at the level we've seen the last two years. And I have to speculate that there were probably at least a couple seniors that wanted to come back and were told thanks but no. Pure speculation on my part! And I expected that this would be a challenging year due to all the new faces but that if in fact Berry thought it was best for the team in the long run since not retaining seniors would not push back any recruits, it would work out better in the long run. Or maybe it's a push since not all the portal players he brought in are fifth year seniors. 

  • Upvote 4
Posted
4 hours ago, gfhockey said:

Please which ones we beat out Michigan. Minnesota the Boston’s 

Why aren’t you comparing to Duluth in this aspect?  After all, none of those teams have Nattys since we won ours.  Perunovich wasn’t drafted coming into Duluth, and their best recruit this year, Dominic James, wasn’t highly sought after.  The list goes on and on.  

Posted
4 hours ago, stoneySIOUX said:

This is such a dumb argument. You can absolutely have the opinion that Bubbs should be fired, but it's 1) not happening any time soon and 2) not founded in anything but being butthurt about a team that is currently leading the NCHC.

There is a reason he needs to self medicate and try to expect perfection from others when he can’t even complete a full sentence! 

Posted
5 hours ago, stoneySIOUX said:

Ok, so, we have qualifiers now... Cool. How about Perron?

Sorry, you were responding to a comment about winning "major recruiting battles" against other "blue bloods", and I presumed that was the context of your response. 

So it was pretty concerning if Jason Blake's son was the second person that came to mind when discussing winning major recruiting battles.

Perron's a great recruit no doubt, but he always wanted to be at UND, so not sure how much of a battle it was to get him to UND either.

Posted
10 hours ago, fightingsioux4life said:

I am not there yet. However, if he keeps losing recruiting battles and settles for grindaz (Copyright @gfhockey), he will find himself without a job at some point.

if you don't wanna pay the licenseing fees try "garbage platers"

  • Upvote 1
Posted
6 hours ago, stoneySIOUX said:

This is such a dumb argument. You can absolutely have the opinion that Bubbs should be fired, but it's 1) not happening any time soon and 2) not founded in anything but being butthurt about a team that is currently leading the NCHC.

A lot of people will tell you that winning the NCHC is more of an accomplishment than winning a natty.  Imo winning a natty is about havig a good team but you gotta get hot at tournament time.  In 2016 we got red hot at NCAA time.  Winning the NCHC is about consistency.

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, siouxnatty#8 said:

A lot of people will tell you that winning the NCHC is more of an accomplishment than winning a natty.  Imo winning a natty is about havig a good team but you gotta get hot at tournament time.  In 2016 we got red hot at NCAA time.  Winning the NCHC is about consistency.

Not a single person with a functioning brain will say this.

Posted
9 hours ago, siouxnatty#8 said:

A lot of people will tell you that winning the NCHC is more of an accomplishment than winning a natty.  Imo winning a natty is about havig a good team but you gotta get hot at tournament time.  In 2016 we got red hot at NCAA time.  Winning the NCHC is about consistency.

Wtf are you on? I’ve never heard. Person want to win a conny vs natty

 

i bet berry will tell you he would trade all his connys for nattys 

Posted
13 hours ago, gfhockey said:

Wtf are you on? I’ve never heard. Person want to win a conny vs natty

 

i bet berry will tell you he would trade all his connys for nattys 

Yes Nattys are better but a conference championship in the NCHC is no small feat.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...