Blackheart Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Which is harder to win and which is more important? Discuss/flame away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darell1976 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 I am a fan of both. So to me both sports are important and both are hard to win. Right now UND is among the big boys in hockey, but in football we are just the average joes and with teams like Montana, Montana State, EWU and Cal Poly just winning our conference is tough enough winning a championship is even more tough. Hopefully with patience, luck, and a great recruiting class UND can get a championship in both sports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawn-O Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Both are a grind. I'll say NCAA Hockey is more difficult only because the sport lends itself to more upsets (see 1996-97 Michigan, 2010-11 North Dakota). I will actually say with all the conference shuffling in both sports that I'm more excited for football. The loss of the Minnesota and Wisconsin hockey series' to me is a big blow to the schedule, while the football schedule is loaded with quality. Just my $0.02. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxbow6 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Both are a grind. I'll say NCAA Hockey is more difficult only because the sport lends itself to more upsets (see 1996-97 Michigan, 2010-11 North Dakota). Totally agree...plus it has recently been proven that a team can get marginal QB play (at best) at the FBS level and still win a Natty. IMO much easier to cover up flaws or short comings in FB than it is in hockey. Plus there is always the "hot goalie" in hockey. But I'll make this clear...winning a Natty in either sport means you are the best in your current place in college athletics. To argue anything else is ignorant. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 If you ask the Bison Nation in Fargo, they will tell you that FCS is more difficult. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siouxperfan7 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 This thread was started so Hayduke can focus all his attention, agression, hostility agaist FCS football in just this one thread, instead of doing it in every other one! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND-FB-FAN Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Football >>>> Hockey. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redneksioux Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 In the ncaa's comparing fcs to fbs football is like comparing d3 to d1 hockey. Sure any team can step up and compete on any given day but fcs/d3 are just a tier lower. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Football 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxbow6 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Football...why?? Like to hear the reasoning. In both scenarios there are realistically 6-8 teams every year with a chance to win it all. A bounce or two won't decide a FB playoff game but will in hockey. Too many variables in hockey that makes it more unpredictable when you get to the final 8 teams IMO. Unless you have a QB that has a tendency to throw a pick 6 game in and game out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 A bounce or two won't decide a FB playoff game A bounce? Sometimes. http://youtu.be/7xMDIcsUMmA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goon Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Football...why?? Like to hear the reasoning. In both scenarios there are realistically 6-8 teams every year with a chance to win it all. A bounce or two won't decide a FB playoff game but will in hockey. Too many variables in hockey that makes it more unpredictable when you get to the final 8 teams IMO. Unless you have a QB that has a tendency to throw a pick 6 game in and game out. I am going to agree with Oxbow, there are a handful of FCS teams that can win a NCAA title in Football, there are more in Hockey. Yale proved that this past season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxbow6 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 A bounce? Sometimes. http://youtu.be/7xMDIcsUMmA I'll give you that one, but you probably were not even born when that happened and to find a few more like that since that "bounce" happened would be a challenge. "Luck", a bounce or whatever you want to call it determines more games in hockey than any other team sport. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBR Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 The hockey team that plays harder and in a more coordinated fasion has the most luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnboyND7 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 I'll give you that one, but you probably were not even born when that happened and to find a few more like that since that "bounce" happened would be a challenge. "Luck", a bounce or whatever you want to call it determines more games in hockey than any other team sport. Soccer features the same stuff hockey does. FCS football is "better" because college football is the choice of the masses. Every major school that has athletics, has football. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackheart Posted August 6, 2013 Author Share Posted August 6, 2013 This thread was started so Hayduke can focus all his attention, agression, hostility agaist FCS football in just this one thread, instead of doing it in every other one! So how about that Nickel Trophy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdub27 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Soccer features the same stuff hockey does. FCS football is "better" because college football is the choice of the masses. Every major school that has athletics, has football. Well that is just inaccurate. Though I would love to hear your definition of a "major school". You're doing so well impressing people over on FU's board lately, let's see what you got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnboyND7 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Well that is just inaccurate. Though I would love to hear your definition of a "major school". You're doing so well impressing people over on FU's board lately, let's see what you got. Schools that are household names....with few exceptions. Don't think Gonzaga has a football team. Or Xavier....but the only reason I know these places even exist is because of basketball. Would hardly call them household names. And honestly, I really don't care if I impress people that I don't know unless they got a job waiting for me after I graduate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdub27 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Schools that are household names. And honestly, I really don't care if I impress people that I don't know unless they got a job waiting for me after I graduate. George Mason, Boston U, Bradley, any of the Cal State's, Creighton, Denver, DePaul, Gonzaga, George Washington, Marquette, NYU, Seton Hall, Wichita State, Xavier, etc, etc, etc.... Plus, 50% of your main conference doesn't sponsor football as well, along with quite a few teams who have left it behind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choyt3 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 George Mason, Boston U, Bradley, any of the Cal State's, Creighton, Denver, DePaul, Gonzaga, George Washington, Marquette, NYU, Seton Hall, Wichita State, Xavier, etc, etc, etc.... Plus, 50% of your main conference doesn't sponsor football as well, along with quite a few teams who have left it behind. But he didn't mean THOSE schools. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 I'll give you that one, but you probably were not even born when that happened and to find a few more like that since that "bounce" happened would be a challenge. "Luck", a bounce or whatever you want to call it determines more games in hockey than any other team sport. I was born long before this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnboyND7 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 George Mason, Boston U, Bradley, any of the Cal State's, Creighton, Denver, DePaul, Gonzaga, George Washington, Marquette, NYU, Seton Hall, Wichita State, Xavier, etc, etc, etc.... Plus, 50% of your main conference doesn't sponsor football as well, along with quite a few teams who have left it behind. Touche. I recognize those names. I don't know if the average American would have ever heard of some of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Vikings fans are used to one play deciding their season http://youtu.be/R-3DDFGvnII Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geaux_sioux Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 http://youtu.be/Odzc2Ig573g Pretty similar if you ask me. I understand the difference of the two sports but they can each be decided by one play/bounce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayduke Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 I'm honored. No time to rage now, but I will later! ;o) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.