2026-27 University of North Dakota Hockey Season

[Oxbow6]

1 hour ago, burd said:

He can feed the multitude with a small basket of fishes. 

No bread? Probably are gluten intolerant.....lactose intolerant as well.  

[rochsioux]

4 hours ago, Fratt Mattin said:

I personally would be fine with know offsides review at all, in any situation. Would there be some missed offsides that lead to crucial goals? Of course. But let's be honest, the vast majority of missed offsides calls are off by literal centimeters. It's just not worth the collective breath holding we all have to do after an exciting goal that comes on a close zone entry

All fine and well until the linesman misses an obvious offside call that results in a game winner. 
Rather than eliminate the review I would like to see it more like the NHL. Lose the review and it’s an automatic 2 minute minor for delay of game, no using the timeout to avoid the penalty. 

[burd]

On 5/21/2026 at 6:17 PM, Sioux90 said:

Wrong thread men. We live in the present, here.

😄.  Sioux fans live in the present. 

[sioux rube]

17 hours ago, Fratt Mattin said:

I personally would be fine with know offsides review at all, in any situation. Would there be some missed offsides that lead to crucial goals? Of course. But let's be honest, the vast majority of missed offsides calls are off by literal centimeters. It's just not worth the collective breath holding we all have to do after an exciting goal that comes on a close zone entry

Not to mention linesman calling offsides when it actually wasn’t. Nothing one can do about so I’m all for no offsides reviews 

[atxsioux]

34 minutes ago, sioux rube said:

Not to mention linesman calling offsides when it actually wasn’t. Nothing one can do about so I’m all for no offsides reviews 

The intent + spirit of the rule when they made it was so you couldn’t cherry pick 5+ feet past the blueline for offense lol. 

 

Not nitpick if someone’s was 5 centimeters offside
 

 

[AlphaMikeFoxtrot]

Reviewing allows refs to err on the side of onsides and not blow an exciting play dead. Waiting for verification is the price we pay to have fewer whistles and more action. My biggest (but certainly not only) gripe with soccer is how anytime there's an exciting break they blow it dead for offsides.

[Fratt Mattin]

39 minutes ago, AlphaMikeFoxtrot said:

Reviewing allows refs to err on the side of onsides and not blow an exciting play dead. Waiting for verification is the price we pay to have fewer whistles and more action. My biggest (but certainly not only) gripe with soccer is how anytime there's an exciting break they blow it dead for offsides.

Was this a problem before offsides review though? I've been watching hockey a long time and I really don't remember this being any bigger of a problem pre-offsides review versus post